<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Fluid Flow &amp; Aerodynamics — why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong</title>
  <subtitle>An illustrated collection of essays about how air and water actually move — lift, circulation, pressure, separation, and the dimensionless numbers that decide which regime a flow is in. Every field is solved rather than sketched, and the famous wrong explanations are tested against the site&#39;s own solver and found false.</subtitle>
  <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/feed.xml" rel="self"/>
  <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/"/>
  <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/</id>
  <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>What actually holds a wing up</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/what-holds-a-wing-up/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/what-holds-a-wing-up/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>Not the shape, and not the story about air meeting up again behind. A wing lifts because there is circulation round it, and the sharp trailing edge is what decides how much.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The story about air meeting up again</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/equal-transit-time/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/equal-transit-time/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>The most repeated explanation of lift says that air parting at the nose must rejoin at the tail, so the longer upper path forces a higher speed. The premise is false, and the speed it predicts is wrong by a factor of twenty.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Everything happens in a layer you cannot see</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/the-thin-layer/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/the-thin-layer/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>Air has so little viscosity that ignoring it works almost everywhere. Almost everywhere leaves out a film next to the surface, perhaps a millimetre thick, and that film decides drag, stall and whether an aircraft flies at all.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>One number decides which physics applies</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/one-number-decides/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/one-number-decides/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>A bacterium and a whale both swim, and they are not doing the same thing at different sizes. The ratio of inertia to viscosity separates them, and crossing it changes the rules rather than the magnitudes.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Streamlines are not the paths particles take</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/streamlines-are-not-paths/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/streamlines-are-not-paths/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>Three different curves get drawn through a flow and they are routinely treated as one. In steady flow they coincide, which is why the confusion survives; in unsteady flow they are as different as a photograph and a long exposure.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The theory that solves everything</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/the-exact-theory/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/the-exact-theory/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>Throw away viscosity and assume nothing is spinning, and fluid mechanics collapses into a linear problem with closed-form answers. The price is one term, and the term turns out to matter more than everything kept.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The exact theory says nothing has any drag</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/no-drag-at-all/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/no-drag-at-all/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>Solve the flow past a body in a fluid with no viscosity and the answer is beautiful, closed-form, and predicts that a cyclist needs no legs and an airliner no engines. This is not a small error, and it is the most useful failure in the subject.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The sharp edge decides</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/the-kutta-condition/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/the-kutta-condition/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>Ideal flow round a wing admits infinitely many solutions, each with a different lift, and all of them exact. One extra requirement — that the air leaves the trailing edge instead of whipping round it — picks a single one.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>When the flow lets go</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/when-the-flow-lets-go/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/when-the-flow-lets-go/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>Every body asks the air behind it to slow down and climb back up to the pressure it started at. Sometimes the air cannot, and the moment it refuses is separation — the source of most drag, the cause of stall, and the reason a golf ball has dimples.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Where Bernoulli&#39;s equation applies</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/where-bernoulli-applies/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/where-bernoulli-applies/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>The equation is right. Its hypotheses are strict, and almost all misuse is a correct formula carried somewhere it does not hold — across streamlines, through a fan, or into the one layer where friction is the whole story.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Mass has nowhere to go</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/mass-has-nowhere-to-go/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/mass-has-nowhere-to-go/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>Squeeze a stream of fluid and it speeds up, not because anything pushes it but because the same amount has to get through a smaller gap every second. Almost every result in the subject is that observation with more machinery attached.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Reynolds number, and the length in it</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/the-reynolds-number/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/the-reynolds-number/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>The most useful number in fluid mechanics has an arbitrary quantity buried in it, and quoting one without saying which length was used makes it meaningless. That detail is where most misuse comes from.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The lift curve, and why it is a straight line</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/the-lift-curve/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/the-lift-curve/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>Lift against angle of attack is a straight line, it does not pass through the origin, and its slope is very close to a number that has no business being there. All three facts fall out of the theory.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Flows add up</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/flows-add-up/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/flows-add-up/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>The equations of ideal flow are linear, so solutions can be laid on top of one another. A uniform stream plus a doublet produces a cylinder that nobody put there, and almost every classical result is built this way.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The two theories, side by side</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/ideal-against-real/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/ideal-against-real/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>The exact solution and the real flow, for the same body in the same stream. One is beautiful and predicts nothing has drag; the other is approximate and has a wake in it. Where they agree and where they part is the whole map of the subject.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>When air stops being incompressible</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/when-air-stops-being-incompressible/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/when-air-stops-being-incompressible/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>Air is a gas and can obviously be squeezed, yet most of aerodynamics treats its density as fixed. The assumption holds until the flow approaches the speed at which pressure information travels — and then everything changes at once.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What a flow is</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/what-a-flow-is/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/what-a-flow-is/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>A fluid is made of molecules and nobody models it that way. Treating it as a continuous field with a velocity at every point is an approximation, an extremely good one, and knowing why it works is knowing where it stops.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Lift with no wing at all</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/lift-without-a-wing/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/lift-without-a-wing/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>A spinning cylinder has no camber, no aerofoil section and no trailing edge, and it lifts exactly as hard as its circulation says it should. Which settles what lift is caused by.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Fast means low pressure</title>
    <link href="https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/speed-and-pressure/"/>
    <id>https://www.fluid-flow-aerodynamics.com/essays/speed-and-pressure/</id>
    <updated>2026-08-04T13:18:30.558Z</updated>
    <summary>The trade between speed and pressure is the most useful relation in the subject and the most misused. Where it comes from, what it costs, and why the pressure over a wing is negative almost everywhere.</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
