Generator

Two divergence-free fields with the same boundary conditions

Two divergence-free fields with the same boundary conditions
Two divergence-free fields with the same boundary conditions. On the left, the exact potential flow round a cylinder moving through fluid at rest. On the right, the same flow with a divergence-free eddy added — one that has no normal velocity on the body or on the outer circle, so it changes nothing about what crosses a boundary. Both fields conserve mass, both satisfy the wall condition, and only one is the flow. Nothing in the drawing says which.

On the left, the exact potential flow round a cylinder moving through fluid at rest. On the right, the same flow with a divergence-free eddy added — one that has no normal velocity on the body or on the outer circle, so it changes nothing about what crosses a boundary. Both fields conserve mass, both satisfy the wall condition, and only one is the flow. Nothing in the drawing says which.

2 essays call least-energy. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

It is also the blast radius. Changing least-energy changes every figure listed here at once, and on this site it may change what they assert as well as what they show — which is what has to be rebuilt and looked at before the change is believed.

Where it is called

What each of these essays asks for instead of the defaults is on the regime index, which reads the parameters back out of the finished figures rather than out of the placements.

The whole library · All essays