Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Theme

The thread: The exact theory is wrong

Ideal flow is closed-form, elegant and predicts that an aeroplane needs no engines. Every honest account of this subject is organised around what that failure reveals.

193 essays carry this thread — page 1 of 22.

Ideal flow past a cylinder. A uniform stream past a circular cylinder in a fluid with no viscosity. The solution is exact and closed-form: streamlines part at a stagnation point, run round the surface and close up perfectly behind, and the pressure recovers to exactly what it was in front. Ideal flow

The theory that solves everything

Throw away viscosity and assume nothing is spinning, and fluid mechanics collapses into a linear problem with closed-form answers. The price is one term, and the term turns out to matter more than everything kept.

 The laminar line does not end; the flow leaves it. Friction factor against Reynolds number in a pipe. The laminar law f = 64/Re is exact and is drawn continuing past the transitional Reynolds number, faintly, because it remains a solution there — the flow simply stops taking it. The turbulent branch is Blasius' correlation and begins where experiments find transition, not where any calculation puts it. Transition and turbulence

The solutions stop being chosen

Hagen and Poiseuille's pipe profile is an exact solution of the Navier–Stokes equations at every Reynolds number, and it is linearly stable at every Reynolds number. Something else happens at 2300 anyway, and it is not that the solution stopped being one.

 Flow past a cylinder at Re 40. A real fluid past a circular cylinder. At low Reynolds number the flow closes up behind the body much as the ideal theory says; as it rises the flow separates and a region of reversed flow appears behind, which is where drag comes from. Viscosity

Everything happens in a layer you cannot see

Air has so little viscosity that ignoring it works almost everywhere. Almost everywhere leaves out a film next to the surface, perhaps a millimetre thick, and that film decides drag, stall and whether an aircraft flies at all.

 A Joukowski aerofoil at 6°. A cambered aerofoil in a uniform stream. The circulation is not chosen: it is whatever value makes the flow leave the sharp trailing edge smoothly, and that single condition fixes the lift. Circulation and lift

What actually holds a wing up

Not the shape, and not the story about air meeting up again behind. A wing lifts because there is circulation round it, and the sharp trailing edge is what decides how much.

 d'Alembert's paradox, measured. Surface pressure round a cylinder in ideal flow, plotted against angle. The distribution is symmetric front to back, so every push on the front is matched by an equal push on the back, and the total force along the stream is exactly zero. Ideal flow

The exact theory says nothing has any drag

Solve the flow past a body in a fluid with no viscosity and the answer is beautiful, closed-form, and predicts that a cyclist needs no legs and an airliner no engines. This is not a small error, and it is the most useful failure in the subject.

 A Joukowski aerofoil at 8°. A cambered aerofoil in a uniform stream. The circulation is not chosen: it is whatever value makes the flow leave the sharp trailing edge smoothly, and that single condition fixes the lift. Circulation and lift

The sharp edge decides

Ideal flow round a wing admits infinitely many solutions, each with a different lift, and all of them exact. One extra requirement — that the air leaves the trailing edge instead of whipping round it — picks a single one.

 Flow past a cylinder at Re 100. A real fluid past a circular cylinder. At low Reynolds number the flow closes up behind the body much as the ideal theory says; as it rises the flow separates and a region of reversed flow appears behind, which is where drag comes from. Viscosity

When the flow lets go

Every body asks the air behind it to slow down and climb back up to the pressure it started at. Sometimes the air cannot, and the moment it refuses is separation — the source of most drag, the cause of stall, and the reason a golf ball has dimples.

 A source at Mach 2.00, and the sound it has already made. Each circle is one pressure pulse, expanding at the speed of sound from the point the source was at when it left. Below the speed of sound every circle still contains the source, so the pressure disturbance reaches every point of the fluid before the source does. Above it the circles have an envelope, and outside that envelope nothing has been heard at all. Compressible flow

When the warning cannot arrive

Supersonic flow is not fast flow. It is flow in which the fluid ahead has been told nothing, because the body is outrunning its own pressure signals — and that single change turns an equation of one type into an equation of another.

 A shear layer, and the point of inflection in it. The velocity profile U = tanh y across a layer of finite thickness, with the inflection point located by searching for a sign change in the second derivative rather than by reading it off the algebra. Rayleigh's theorem says an inviscid parallel flow can only be unstable if such a point exists — a necessary condition, not a sufficient one. Transition and turbulence

A layer with a kink in it

Rayleigh proved in 1880 that an inviscid shear flow cannot be unstable unless its velocity profile bends the other way somewhere. It is one line of algebra, it is necessary and not sufficient, and it ties instability to separation through the sign of a single derivative at the wall.

All themes