The thread: Lift is circulation
63 essays carry this thread — page 1 of 7.
The story about air meeting up again
The most repeated explanation of lift says that air parting at the nose must rejoin at the tail, so the longer upper path forces a higher speed. The premise is false, and the speed it predicts is wrong by a factor of twenty.
What actually holds a wing up
Not the shape, and not the story about air meeting up again behind. A wing lifts because there is circulation round it, and the sharp trailing edge is what decides how much.
The sharp edge decides
Ideal flow round a wing admits infinitely many solutions, each with a different lift, and all of them exact. One extra requirement — that the air leaves the trailing edge instead of whipping round it — picks a single one.
Air must be pushed down, and the usual sum is wrong
The momentum explanation of lift is the one physicists reach for, and it is right — a wing does hold itself up by throwing air downwards. The version usually given then does the accounting badly, and the face of the control volume it keeps turns out to carry the least of it.
Flows add up
The equations of ideal flow are linear, so solutions can be laid on top of one another. A uniform stream plus a doublet produces a cylinder that nobody put there, and almost every classical result is built this way.
The lift curve, and why it is a straight line
Lift against angle of attack is a straight line, it does not pass through the origin, and its slope is very close to a number that has no business being there. All three facts fall out of the theory.
Lift with no wing at all
A spinning cylinder has no camber, no aerofoil section and no trailing edge, and it lifts exactly as hard as its circulation says it should. Which settles what lift is caused by.
Fast means low pressure
The trade between speed and pressure is the most useful relation in the subject and the most misused. Where it comes from, what it costs, and why the pressure over a wing is negative almost everywhere.
Spin is not the same as going round
A whirlpool whose streamlines are perfect circles can have no rotation in it anywhere. A flow whose streamlines are dead straight and parallel can be rotating everywhere. Both statements are true, and getting them the wrong way round is the most expensive confusion in the subject.