Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Theme

The thread: Everything happens in a thin layer

Viscosity is negligible almost everywhere and decisive in a film a millimetre thick, and that film decides drag, stall and the wake.

84 essays carry this thread — page 1 of 10.

Reynolds number: one number, four different flows. Reynolds number is inertia ÷ viscosity. It is not a property of the fluid or of the shape but of the combination, and crossing a threshold changes the physics rather than the magnitude. Regimes and numbers

One number decides which physics applies

A bacterium and a whale both swim, and they are not doing the same thing at different sizes. The ratio of inertia to viscosity separates them, and crossing it changes the rules rather than the magnitudes.

 Streamlines and pathlines are not the same curve. In an unsteady flow the line tangent to the velocity everywhere at one instant, and the track a single particle actually follows, are different curves. They coincide only when the flow is steady, which is the hypothesis most figures forget to state. Flows and fields

Streamlines are not the paths particles take

Three different curves get drawn through a flow and they are routinely treated as one. In steady flow they coincide, which is why the confusion survives; in unsteady flow they are as different as a photograph and a long exposure.

 Flow past a cylinder at Re 40. A real fluid past a circular cylinder. At low Reynolds number the flow closes up behind the body much as the ideal theory says; as it rises the flow separates and a region of reversed flow appears behind, which is where drag comes from. Viscosity

Everything happens in a layer you cannot see

Air has so little viscosity that ignoring it works almost everywhere. Almost everywhere leaves out a film next to the surface, perhaps a millimetre thick, and that film decides drag, stall and whether an aircraft flies at all.

 Flow past a cylinder at Re 100. A real fluid past a circular cylinder. At low Reynolds number the flow closes up behind the body much as the ideal theory says; as it rises the flow separates and a region of reversed flow appears behind, which is where drag comes from. Viscosity

When the flow lets go

Every body asks the air behind it to slow down and climb back up to the pressure it started at. Sometimes the air cannot, and the moment it refuses is separation — the source of most drag, the cause of stall, and the reason a golf ball has dimples.

 The hypotheses Bernoulli's equation needs. The equation is correct and its hypotheses are strict. Most misuse is not a wrong formula but a right formula carried across a streamline, through a machine, or into a region where viscosity dominates. What is taught wrongly

Where Bernoulli's equation applies

The equation is right. Its hypotheses are strict, and almost all misuse is a correct formula carried somewhere it does not hold — across streamlines, through a fan, or into the one layer where friction is the whole story.

 A shear layer, and the point of inflection in it. The velocity profile U = tanh y across a layer of finite thickness, with the inflection point located by searching for a sign change in the second derivative rather than by reading it off the algebra. Rayleigh's theorem says an inviscid parallel flow can only be unstable if such a point exists — a necessary condition, not a sufficient one. Transition and turbulence

A layer with a kink in it

Rayleigh proved in 1880 that an inviscid shear flow cannot be unstable unless its velocity profile bends the other way somewhere. It is one line of algebra, it is necessary and not sufficient, and it ties instability to separation through the sign of a single derivative at the wall.

 The laminar boundary-layer profile. Speed against height through a laminar boundary layer on a flat plate, in the similarity variable that collapses every station along the plate onto one curve. The straight line is the slope at the wall, which is what the skin friction is proportional to. Viscosity

How thick is thin

The boundary layer has no edge. It approaches the free stream and never arrives, so any thickness quoted for it is a convention — and the three conventions in use measure three different things, one of which is not a height at all.

 The chart, with one exact line on it. The friction factor of a pipe against Reynolds number, for five relative roughnesses. Every curve here except one is Colebrook's correlation, solved by iteration rather than read off a chart. The exception is the short straight line at the left: f = 64/Re is the laminar solution and it is exact. The curves flatten to the right because once the roughness pokes out of the viscous layer the Reynolds number has nothing left to change. Fluids at work

The roughness a wall cannot feel

A rough pipe and a polished one carry the same flow for the same pressure over three decades of Reynolds number, and then suddenly they do not. What changed is not the pipe. It is the thickness of the film of fluid at the wall, which is the only part of the flow that can see the roughness at all.

 Four ways of photographing one flow, and what each of them records. The same solved flow, rendered as four different laboratory techniques would record it. Smoke from a port gives a streakline; tufts give direction with no speed in it at all; an oil film gives the direction of the friction on the surface rather than the flow above it; pressure taps give a scalar with no direction in it. None of the four is the velocity field, and only the first happens to coincide with a streamline, because this flow is steady. What is taught wrongly

What a photograph of a flow shows

Wind-tunnel pictures are the evidence this whole subject is argued from, and hardly anybody says which quantity a given technique records. They are not interchangeable — smoke, tufts, oil and pressure taps measure four different things, and none of them is the velocity field.

All themes