Who wins, and by how much.
Two players, no dice, nothing hidden, and the player who cannot move loses. That is a narrow enough set of rules to be worth exactly — every position has a value, the value is computed rather than estimated, and positions add. These are essays about what comes out of that, one idea at a time, with the arithmetic done rather than asserted.
Start anywhere
19 essays
What actually holds a wing up
Not the shape, and not the story about air meeting up again behind. A wing lifts because there is circulation round it, and the sharp trailing edge is what decides how much.
What is taught wronglyThe story about air meeting up again
The most repeated explanation of lift says that air parting at the nose must rejoin at the tail, so the longer upper path forces a higher speed. The premise is false, and the speed it predicts is wrong by a factor of twenty.
ViscosityEverything happens in a layer you cannot see
Air has so little viscosity that ignoring it works almost everywhere. Almost everywhere leaves out a film next to the surface, perhaps a millimetre thick, and that film decides drag, stall and whether an aircraft flies at all.
Regimes and numbersOne number decides which physics applies
A bacterium and a whale both swim, and they are not doing the same thing at different sizes. The ratio of inertia to viscosity separates them, and crossing it changes the rules rather than the magnitudes.
Flows and fieldsStreamlines are not the paths particles take
Three different curves get drawn through a flow and they are routinely treated as one. In steady flow they coincide, which is why the confusion survives; in unsteady flow they are as different as a photograph and a long exposure.
Ideal flowThe theory that solves everything
Throw away viscosity and assume nothing is spinning, and fluid mechanics collapses into a linear problem with closed-form answers. The price is one term, and the term turns out to matter more than everything kept.
Ideal flowThe exact theory says nothing has any drag
Solve the flow past a body in a fluid with no viscosity and the answer is beautiful, closed-form, and predicts that a cyclist needs no legs and an airliner no engines. This is not a small error, and it is the most useful failure in the subject.
Circulation and liftThe sharp edge decides
Ideal flow round a wing admits infinitely many solutions, each with a different lift, and all of them exact. One extra requirement — that the air leaves the trailing edge instead of whipping round it — picks a single one.
ViscosityWhen the flow lets go
Every body asks the air behind it to slow down and climb back up to the pressure it started at. Sometimes the air cannot, and the moment it refuses is separation — the source of most drag, the cause of stall, and the reason a golf ball has dimples.
What is taught wronglyWhere Bernoulli's equation applies
The equation is right. Its hypotheses are strict, and almost all misuse is a correct formula carried somewhere it does not hold — across streamlines, through a fan, or into the one layer where friction is the whole story.
Flows and fieldsMass has nowhere to go
Squeeze a stream of fluid and it speeds up, not because anything pushes it but because the same amount has to get through a smaller gap every second. Almost every result in the subject is that observation with more machinery attached.
Regimes and numbersThe Reynolds number, and the length in it
The most useful number in fluid mechanics has an arbitrary quantity buried in it, and quoting one without saying which length was used makes it meaningless. That detail is where most misuse comes from.
Circulation and liftThe lift curve, and why it is a straight line
Lift against angle of attack is a straight line, it does not pass through the origin, and its slope is very close to a number that has no business being there. All three facts fall out of the theory.
Ideal flowFlows add up
The equations of ideal flow are linear, so solutions can be laid on top of one another. A uniform stream plus a doublet produces a cylinder that nobody put there, and almost every classical result is built this way.
ViscosityThe two theories, side by side
The exact solution and the real flow, for the same body in the same stream. One is beautiful and predicts nothing has drag; the other is approximate and has a wake in it. Where they agree and where they part is the whole map of the subject.
Regimes and numbersWhen air stops being incompressible
Air is a gas and can obviously be squeezed, yet most of aerodynamics treats its density as fixed. The assumption holds until the flow approaches the speed at which pressure information travels — and then everything changes at once.
Flows and fieldsWhat a flow is
A fluid is made of molecules and nobody models it that way. Treating it as a continuous field with a velocity at every point is an approximation, an extremely good one, and knowing why it works is knowing where it stops.
Circulation and liftLift with no wing at all
A spinning cylinder has no camber, no aerofoil section and no trailing edge, and it lifts exactly as hard as its circulation says it should. Which settles what lift is caused by.
Ideal flowFast means low pressure
The trade between speed and pressure is the most useful relation in the subject and the most misused. Where it comes from, what it costs, and why the pressure over a wing is negative almost everywhere.
Threads running through
themes, not chapters
The exact theory is wrong
Ideal flow is closed-form, elegant and predicts that an aeroplane needs no engines. Every honest account of this subject is organised around what that failure reveals.
One number decides the regime
The same shape in the same fluid behaves completely differently at different Reynolds numbers. The shape is not the question; the ratio is.
Lift is circulation
Not shape, not equal transit times, not air pushed down in the way usually claimed. Lift is the circulation round the body, and the Kutta condition is what fixes it.
Everything happens in a thin layer
Viscosity is negligible almost everywhere and decisive in a film a millimetre thick, and that film decides drag, stall and the wake.
What is conserved
Mass, momentum, circulation, vorticity. Every result worth having is a statement that one of them cannot go anywhere, and every check in this site's solver is a test that it did not.
A smooth picture proves nothing
Streamlines are smooth whatever nonsense produced them. A flow figure is only worth as much as the conservation laws it was checked against.
Taught wrongly, everywhere
Some of the most repeated explanations in physics education are in this subject, and they are false. Stating them fairly and then testing them is more useful than ignoring them.