Theme

The thread: A smooth picture proves nothing

Streamlines are smooth whatever nonsense produced them. A flow figure is only worth as much as the conservation laws it was checked against.

172 essays carry this thread — page 1 of 20.

Two parcels released together do not arrive together. The most repeated explanation of lift says that air parting at the leading edge must meet again at the trailing edge, so the longer upper path forces a higher speed. Released into the solved field, the upper parcel arrives long before the lower one — the premise is simply false, and the real speed difference is larger than it would require.

What is taught wrongly

The story about air meeting up again

The most repeated explanation of lift says that air parting at the nose must rejoin at the tail, so the longer upper path forces a higher speed. The premise is false, and the speed it predicts is wrong by a factor of twenty.

Streamlines and pathlines are not the same curve. In an unsteady flow the line tangent to the velocity everywhere at one instant, and the track a single particle actually follows, are different curves. They coincide only when the flow is steady, which is the hypothesis most figures forget to state.

Flows and fields

Streamlines are not the paths particles take

Three different curves get drawn through a flow and they are routinely treated as one. In steady flow they coincide, which is why the confusion survives; in unsteady flow they are as different as a photograph and a long exposure.

The laminar line does not end; the flow leaves it. Friction factor against Reynolds number in a pipe. The laminar law f = 64/Re is exact and is drawn continuing past the transitional Reynolds number, faintly, because it remains a solution there — the flow simply stops taking it. The turbulent branch is Blasius' correlation and begins where experiments find transition, not where any calculation puts it.

Transition and turbulence

The solutions stop being chosen

Hagen and Poiseuille's pipe profile is an exact solution of the Navier–Stokes equations at every Reynolds number, and it is linearly stable at every Reynolds number. Something else happens at 2300 anyway, and it is not that the solution stopped being one.

A source at Mach 0.55, and the sound it has already made. Each circle is one pressure pulse, expanding at the speed of sound from the point the source was at when it left. Below the speed of sound every circle still contains the source, so the pressure disturbance reaches every point of the fluid before the source does. Above it the circles have an envelope, and outside that envelope nothing has been heard at all.

Compressible flow

What a signal travels at

Air finds out that an aeroplane is coming, and it finds out at a definite speed. That speed does not depend on how hard the air is squeezed or on how much of it there is — only on how hot it is — and every result in compressible flow is downstream of that one fact.

A streamtube narrows and the flow speeds up. Two neighbouring streamlines bound a tube that no fluid crosses. Where the tube pinches, the same mass has to pass through a smaller gap every second, so it must move faster — which is mass conservation with no equations in sight.

Flows and fields

Mass has nowhere to go

Squeeze a stream of fluid and it speeds up, not because anything pushes it but because the same amount has to get through a smaller gap every second. Almost every result in the subject is that observation with more machinery attached.

Ideal flow

The exact theory says nothing has any drag

Solve the flow past a body in a fluid with no viscosity and the answer is beautiful, closed-form, and predicts that a cyclist needs no legs and an airliner no engines. This is not a small error, and it is the most useful failure in the subject.

Reynolds number: one number, four different flows. Reynolds number is inertia ÷ viscosity. It is not a property of the fluid or of the shape but of the combination, and crossing a threshold changes the physics rather than the magnitude.

Regimes and numbers

The Reynolds number, and the length in it

The most useful number in fluid mechanics has an arbitrary quantity buried in it, and quoting one without saying which length was used makes it meaningless. That detail is where most misuse comes from.

A source at Mach 2.00, and the sound it has already made. Each circle is one pressure pulse, expanding at the speed of sound from the point the source was at when it left. Below the speed of sound every circle still contains the source, so the pressure disturbance reaches every point of the fluid before the source does. Above it the circles have an envelope, and outside that envelope nothing has been heard at all.

Compressible flow

When the warning cannot arrive

Supersonic flow is not fast flow. It is flow in which the fluid ahead has been told nothing, because the body is outrunning its own pressure signals — and that single change turns an equation of one type into an equation of another.

Two drag laws, one derived and one fitted. Flat-plate drag coefficient against Reynolds number, laminar and turbulent, on log axes. The laminar curve is Blasius' similarity solution, solved by shooting; the turbulent one is the 1/7-power correlation, which was fitted to experiment and is drawn dashed-in-kind to keep the difference visible. Their slopes differ — −1/2 against −1/5 — so the gap between them widens rather than staying put.

Transition and turbulence

The number that is not a number

Transition Reynolds numbers are quoted to three figures and vary by two decades. That is not sloppiness in the measurement — it is the honest report of a quantity that depends on the laboratory as much as on the fluid, and knowing which part is which decides what may be designed on it.

All themes