Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Series

Boundary conditions — the series

6 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. One more condition, and the price of it. The model problem ε u″ + u′ = 0 with a condition at each end, at three values of ε. The outer solution is the flat line at one — that is the whole of the answer when ε is zero, and it is a first-order equation that can meet one condition, so it meets the one at the far end and misses the one at the wall by the whole range. Restoring ε restores the second condition and pays for it with a layer of thickness ε, inside which the gradient is of order 1/ε. The product of those two — which is what a stress is — does not depend on ε at all: it is 1.0000 at every value tried, to nine decimal places. Drag does not vanish as viscosity does. It converges.

    How many things a flow must be told

    The equations of motion do not have one answer. They have as many as the conditions on the edge allow, and the number of those is decided by the order of the equation — which is why viscosity does not make the same problem harder, it makes a different problem.

    part 1 · kinematics
  2. One number instead of a porous medium. The velocity through the bottom of a channel whose lower wall is a porous block of permeability 1e-4. Inside the block the flow decays over the pore scale √K = 1.0e-2 to Darcy's seepage velocity; above it the channel profile arrives at the interface with a slip velocity rather than at rest. A channel told nothing but u = √K du/dy at a flat wall reproduces that profile to 0.058 per cent of the flow rate, against 3.03 per cent for a wall told to hold the fluid still. The grid solve of the coupled problem agrees with the closed form to 0.0077 per cent.

    A wall that is not quite there

    A porous surface has structure on every scale below the pore, and no calculation resolves it. The whole of it can be replaced by one length — the square root of the permeability — and the replacement is exact to first order, with what it leaves out identifiable as the flow the wall itself carries.

    part 2 · kinematics
  3. In clean water a bubble rises nearly three times as fast as the same bubble in tap water. The terminal rise speed of an air bubble in water at 20 °C against its radius, from buoyancy balanced against drag: with a clean, shear-free surface using Moore's law, and with a surface immobilised by contamination using the rigid-sphere correlation. At 0.3 mm the clean bubble rises at 13.0 cm/s against 6.7; at 0.5 mm at 31.0 against 11.2, a factor of 2.76. Beyond a radius of 0.47 mm the clean bubble's Weber number passes one, its shape flattens, and a spherical calculation stops describing it; that region is shaded. Nothing about the bubble's size, gas or liquid changes between the two curves — only whether its surface can move.

    The vorticity a clean surface cannot refuse

    A clean bubble's surface cannot hold a shear stress, and it is easy to conclude that it makes no vorticity. On a curved surface it must carry exactly 2κu — three times the speed over the radius at a sphere's equator, whatever the Reynolds number. That is so much weaker than a rigid wall's that the flow stays irrotational to leading order, and the bubble's drag is the dissipation of that irrotational flow: 48/Re, three to ten times below a rigid sphere's.

    part 3 · kinematics
  4. Slip follows the stripes more closely than the shear does. Plan views of a striped surface, with the stripes running across each panel, for a shear at 0°, 30°, 54.7° and 90° to them. The faint arrow is the direction of the shear; the dark one is the slip velocity it produces, whose component along the stripes is the along-stripe slip length times the shear and whose component across them is half that. The slip is turned towards the stripes by 0.0°, 13.9°, 19.5° and 0.0°. It is largest, 19.47°, for a shear at 54.74°, where tan θ = √2. A surface with a tensor for a boundary condition can push a flow sideways, which a scalar slip length never can.

    Twice as slippery along as across

    A surface of alternating gas and solid stripes lets a liquid slip, and a flow far above it sees one number in place of the pattern — but the number depends on which way the flow goes. Along the stripes it is Philip's logarithm; across them it is exactly half, for a reason that takes one substitution to show. And the logarithm means that the slip is bought by the pattern's period rather than by how much of it is gas.

    part 4 · kinematics
  5. Posts slip as one over the root of their fraction. The slip length of a surface of posts, over the period of their square array, against the fraction of the surface that is solid, beside Philip's stripes along and across and the dilute limit in which each post is a lone disc dragged edgewise, (3/16)√(π/φ). At a hundredth solid the posts slip 2.87 periods against the stripes' 1.32; at a tenth 0.597 against 0.591, nearly equal; at a half 0.0663 against 0.11 along the stripes and 0.0552 across them.

    A post holds liquid back by its radius, a stripe by its length

    A surface of no-slip posts standing in a gas-filled texture lets liquid slip over it, and the slip length grows as one over the square root of the solid fraction, where a surface of stripes grows only as its logarithm. The reason is the oldest contrast in slow flow: a disc dragged through a viscous liquid has a drag proportional to its radius, which is Stokes' law, and a line has no finite drag at all, which is Stokes' paradox. But sparse posts beat stripes only while they are sparse.

    part 5 · kinematics
  6. Pressed into their grooves, the menisci cost a striped surface at most a quarter of its slip before it floods. The slip length along the stripes as a share of the flat meniscus's, against the liquid's pressure over the gas's as aΔp/γ, for gas fractions of 0.5, 0.8 and 0.95; the groove floods when the arc meets a vertical wall at its advancing angle — 110°, 120° and 150° at pressures 0.342, 0.5 and 0.866. 0.5: 0.93, 0.903 and 0.84 kept at those floods; 0.8: 0.913, 0.879 and 0.804 kept at those floods; 0.95: 0.888, 0.845 and 0.752 kept at those floods.

    A bowed meniscus keeps most of its slip until the groove floods

    The slip lengths of a striped superhydrophobic surface are computed with flat gas surfaces. Press the liquid against the texture and every meniscus bows into its groove as an arc pinned at the solid's edges, and the slip falls. It falls by less than the obvious worry says: at the pressure where a groove wall advancing at 120° lets the liquid in, a surface four-fifths gas still keeps 88 per cent of its slip, and even at a 150° wall's flood three-quarters remains. A striped surface does not lose its slip gradually under pressure. It keeps most of it, and then loses all of it when the groove floods.

    part 6 · kinematics

All series