Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Series

Closure — the series

5 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. Ten unknowns, four equations. What is left after the Navier–Stokes equations are averaged. The mean velocities and mean pressure were there before; the six Reynolds stresses are new, and they arrived from the one term that does not average away. Nothing in the count is an approximation — the averaged equations are exact — and that is what makes the gap uncomfortable.

    What averaging costs

    Split the velocity into a mean and a fluctuation, average the equations, and the result is exact. It is also short of six equations, because the one nonlinear term does not average away and leaves six new unknowns behind that nothing determines.

    part 1 · turbulence
  2. Every rung of the hierarchy is worse than the last. Writing a transport equation for the Reynolds stress does not close the system: that equation contains the triple correlation, whose equation contains the quadruple. The bars are the number of independent components at each order and the number of new unknowns its own equations introduce. The second is always larger, and the gap widens.

    The ladder that never closes

    Being six equations short is a problem with an obvious remedy — derive six more. The remedy works, produces an exact equation for the Reynolds stress, and leaves ten new unknowns behind. The gap does not narrow at any level, and the counting says why.

    part 2 · turbulence
  3. u⁺ = (1/κ) ln y⁺ + B, integrated rather than asserted. The velocity profile in wall units, produced by integrating the mixing-length closure outward from the wall. The straight portion is the log law and the constants beside it were least-squares fitted to the integrated curve over 50 < y⁺ < 500 — so the 1/κ is a measurement on the drawing rather than the number that was fed in. The viscous sublayer u⁺ = y⁺ comes out rather than being pasted on.

    A guess with a constant in it

    Prandtl's mixing length is one line — an eddy near a wall can only be as big as its distance from the wall. Integrate it and the whole structure of a turbulent wall profile falls out, sublayer and log region and all. That is a fact about the assumption, and the essay is careful about which.

    part 3 · turbulence
  4. A normal stress the closure makes negative. The Boussinesq closure's first normal stress in a plane strain, against the strain measured in units of the turbulence's own time scale. It crosses zero at S k/eps = 1/(3 C_mu) = 3.704 — eleven per cent above the value the constant was calibrated at — and goes on falling. A variance below zero is not a small error; it is a statement that cannot be true.

    The constant that makes a variance negative

    Every engineering turbulence calculation in the world rests on one number, C-mu equals 0.09. It is not a property of turbulence. It is the assertion that a particular ratio is ten thirds, which is true in one flow — and eleven per cent above that flow the same closure reports a mean square below zero.

    part 4 · turbulence
  5. The stress a closure predicts, and the stress there is. The Reynolds-stress anisotropy through a step change in the strain rate, against what an eddy viscosity gives — which is the equilibrium value at every instant. The real stress takes about a turnover to get there, and during that turnover the closure is wrong by up to sixty per cent.

    A closure with no memory at all

    An eddy viscosity says the Reynolds stress is the mean strain rate times a number, now. The stress it is standing in for takes a turnover to arrive, so the closure is the zero-frequency limit of a response that has a lag in it — and the curve it is the limit of is the same shape as an aerofoil's lift deficiency.

    part 5 · turbulence

All series