Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Series

Porous — the series

7 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. Two velocities, 2.50 apart, and only one of them is anybody's. The velocity in Darcy's law is the flow rate divided by the whole cross-section, solid included: a speed no fluid particle ever has, since the fluid occupies only the fraction ε of that area. The speed the fluid actually averages is larger by exactly 1/ε — 2.50 times here — and it is the one that belongs in a residence time, in a pore Reynolds number and in any statement about when a tracer arrives. The grains are drawn to say that the pore-scale flow is not computed here: nothing above resolves it.

    A velocity nobody has

    The velocity in Darcy's law is the flow rate divided by the whole cross-section, solid included — a speed no fluid particle in the bed ever has. Averaging buys a linear law and charges for it in exactly this coin, and the constant that comes with it is an area of about a square micron.

    part 1 · applied
  2. Two terms, one with viscosity in it and one without. Ergun's two contributions to the pressure gradient, against the pore Reynolds number, on logarithmic axes. The viscous term rises with the first power of the velocity and the inertial one with the square, so on these axes they are straight lines of slope one and two and there is exactly one crossing. The second term contains no viscosity at all — it is the price of accelerating fluid into every pore and out again — which is why a linear resistance law has to fail eventually whatever the fluid is.

    Where Darcy stops

    A linear resistance law has to fail eventually, because pushing fluid into a pore and out again costs energy that has nothing to do with viscosity. Where it fails is one dimensionless number, and that number is 150/1.75 — read out of a correlation's own constants rather than measured.

    part 2 · applied
  3. The pressure drop stops rising at 0.213 m/s. The pressure drop across a bed of 500 µm sand, against the velocity through it, in units of the fluidisation velocity. The rising branch is Ergun's resistance and the flat one is the bed's buoyant weight, which the flow cannot exceed however hard it is pushed: past the corner the bed expands rather than resisting more. That flat line is the reason fluidisation is unmistakable in practice — the corner is a crossing of two curves rather than a gradual departure, and it can be read off a gauge.

    The bed that weighs itself

    Blow hard enough through a pile of sand and the pressure drop stops rising. It cannot rise — a control volume round the bed says the drop can never exceed the buoyant weight of the solid in it, and at the velocity where the two meet the bed stops being a structure and starts being a fluid.

    part 3 · applied
  4. Two different moments of one distribution. The permeability and the specific surface of a log-normal bundle, against the width of its pore-size distribution at a fixed median. The permeability rises by five orders because it is a fourth moment and the widest tubes dominate it; the surface falls because it is a first moment and the narrowest tubes dominate that.

    A permeability that is only the geometry

    Kozeny–Carman says that a porous medium's permeability follows from its porosity and its specific surface. Both are real, both are exactly measurable, and they do not determine the answer: forty-nine tube bundles built with identical values of each span a factor of eighty-two in permeability.

    part 4 · applied
  5. When the tracer leaves, given when it went in. The residence-time distribution of three beds with the same mean residence time and different Peclet numbers. Every one of them has its mean at exactly one, and they are nothing alike: the loosest lets a tenth of the tracer out before a third of the mean time has passed, and the tightest is nearly the spike a plug-flow calculation assumes.

    The outlet is the inlet, a while ago

    A bed has a mean residence time and everybody quotes it. Six beds with the same mean let their first hundredth through at 0.20 and at 0.85 of it, mix a window of inlet history between 1.53 and 0.18 wide, and convert a first-order reaction by amounts the mean cannot distinguish.

    part 5 · applied
  6. Time per litre rises in a straight line with the litres already filtered. The elapsed time divided by the filtrate collected, against the filtrate, for a constant-pressure filtration of a silica slurry through a cloth: integrated step by step, and Ruth's closed form. The line's slope is the cake's resistance, which grows with every litre, and its intercept is the cloth's, which does not. After a quarter of a cubic metre the cake is already the larger.

    A filter is slowed by what it has caught

    Push a slurry through a cloth and within minutes the cloth no longer matters: the particles it has caught form a cake, the cake is a packed bed, and every litre filtered makes the bed thicker for the next. The filtrate grows only as the square root of time. And if the cake is soft, it packs tighter against the cloth the harder it is pushed, until more pressure buys almost nothing.

    part 6 · applied
  7. A washed filter's best cycle is shorter, and still has one. The filtrate a batch filter produces per hour, averaged over filtering, washing and twenty minutes of emptying and refilling, against the filtrate collected in each cycle, for a slurry of 400 kilograms of silica per cubic metre and wash ratios of 0, 1, 2 and 5 pore volumes. Each curve has a best cycle, marked, and the wash both lowers it and moves it to a thinner cake: from 0.307 to 0.217 m³ per m² of cloth.

    A washed filter works as long as it rests

    A batch filter that has to be emptied between runs has a best cycle, and the rule for it is exact: the time the cake is responsible for equals the time the filter stands idle. Washing the cake does not break the rule, because a wash through a finished cake costs time in proportion to the square of its thickness, just as filtering it did. What a wash changes is the price, and the price is set by the slurry's concentration and by how far the wash front smears, not by the cake's softness.

    part 7 · applied

All series