Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Series

Slender body — the series

2 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. A loading that integrates to nothing and turns the aeroplane over. The loading a slender body carries at 6 degrees, drawn along it. It is positive over the front half and negative over the back, in equal measure, so the lift integrates to -3.6e-18 — nothing, which is d'Alembert's paradox for a body of revolution. The moment does not: the two halves act at different stations, and the couple that survives is nose-up, grows with the square of the speed, and is what a tail is sized against.

    A body with no lift, and a moment anyway

    A fuselage in ideal flow carries no lift at any incidence and still tries to turn the aeroplane over. The couple is computable in one line, it is why tails are the size they are, and the line comes from applying the wall condition to a place where there is no wall.

    part 1 · inviscid
  2. Three aircraft, and the only thing the drag can see. The cross-sectional area against station, for a clean body, the same body with a wing added, and the body cut away where the wing is. The wave drag depends on this curve and on nothing else about the three shapes — so the middle one pays for its lump and the third does not, although the third has the same wing.

    The drag that can only see one curve

    A slender body's far field is a line of sources of strength A′(x), and nothing else about its shape reaches it. So its supersonic wave drag depends on the cross-sectional area distribution alone — and a fuselage cut away where the wing joins it can carry the wing for nothing.

    part 2 · inviscid

All series