Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Series

Tip vortex — the series

4 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. Elliptic loading rolls up to πb/4, and it is π that puts it there. Three loadings on the same span carrying the same lift, with the rolled-up core positions marked below each. The core sits at the centroid of the shed vorticity, which is a quadrature over the loading and needs nothing about the roll-up itself. Elliptic loading gives πb/8 from the centreline, so the pair ends up 0.7854 of the span apart — the number every wake-separation rule is written against, and one of the few places in this subject where π turns up in an answer an engineer uses directly. The bell rolls up to 0.586 and a nearly rectangular loading to 0.978, because it sheds at the tips.

    Where the wake ends up

    The sheet a wing sheds rolls up into two cores within a few spans, and nobody can compute the roll-up cheaply. Nobody has to: what the cores conserve is fixed before they form, and for an elliptically loaded wing the answer contains π and comes out at 78.5 per cent of the span.

    part 1 · circulation
  2. What is left behind, and what it is made of. The two rolled-up vortices behind a large aircraft, drawn to scale against its span. They sit at 78.5 per cent of the span apart, each carries 508 square metres a second of circulation, and the pair descends at 1.72 metres a second under its own induction.

    A wake that says what made it

    Two vortices sitting behind an aeroplane carry its weight and its span in a form that can be read back out: circulation times separation times density times speed is the lift, exactly. The reading is exact for about a minute and worth nothing after four.

    part 2 · circulation
  3. Which bends of a vortex pair grow, and how fast. The square of the growth rate of a sinusoidal bend of a trailing vortex pair, in units of one e-fold per descent time, against the bend's wavenumber times the spacing, for a core of elliptic loading's size. Where the square is positive the bend grows. The symmetric mode, in which the two vortices bend as mirror images, grows over a long-wave band and fastest at a wavelength of 8.54 spacings, by 0.827 e-folds in the time the pair takes to sink one spacing. The antisymmetric mode, bending in step, is stable across the same band.

    A wake ends by bending, not by fading

    The two vortices behind an aeroplane do not simply weaken until they are gone. In still air each one bends in the other's strain, the bend grows by a factor of e every thirty-three seconds behind an airliner, and after a couple of minutes the pair has pinched itself into a chain of rings. The wavelength it chooses is eight and a half times the spacing, and the vortex cores hardly enter.

    part 3 · circulation
  4. Four vortices bend twice as fast, on shorter waves. Growth rate of the fastest bending wave against its wavelength, both in the units of the equivalent single pair — one unit of growth is one e-fold in the time the wake sinks by its own spacing. Crow's pair grows at most at 0.827, at 8.54 spacings. A flap vortex of 0.3 of the tip's strength at 0.4 of its station keeps a Crow band just below that and adds a second, at 1.57 and 1.8 spacings; one of 0.5 at 0.3 merges the two into one band peaking at 1.64 and 4.4 spacings.

    Four vortices bend faster, and bend the wrong one

    With its flaps down a wing sheds four vortices, not two: a strong one at each tip and a weaker one at each flap's edge, and on each side the two circle one another as the wake sinks. The orbit makes the wake unstable at waves a fifth of Crow's length, growing twice as fast. But the wave that grows is the weak flap vortex being bent round the strong tip vortex, which hardly moves, while the long bend that pinches the tips together grows no faster than before. Only a counter-rotating inner vortex makes the whole wake unstable, and it does so at every wavelength.

    part 4 · circulation

All series