Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Series

Topology — the series

6 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. Two centres, two saddles, and a sum of nothing. A separation pattern: a uniform stream with two counter-rotating cored vortices in it, which reproduces the arrangement of critical points behind a body at a Reynolds number of a few tens. There are exactly four — a saddle where the flow divides, a centre in each recirculating cell, and a saddle where it closes — and their indices sum to 0. The winding number of a loop enclosing all of them is 0, which is what a uniform stream far away requires. A bubble costs nothing in this bookkeeping, which is why one is free to appear.

    The count a pattern cannot break

    A picture of a flow has stagnation points in it, and they are not free to be arranged as anybody likes. Their kinds and their number obey an integer constraint that has nothing to do with the equations of motion — and an incompressible flow in a plane is allowed only two kinds of them in the first place.

    part 1 · kinematics
  2. 4 nodes and 2 saddles, and the difference is the shape. The skin-friction pattern on a body, drawn as the streaks a film of oil would leave, looking at the nose. Every critical point of the field is marked: 4 nodes, where the streaks converge or diverge, and 2 saddles, where two streaks cross. Their indices sum to 2, which is the Euler characteristic of a sphere, and nothing about the flow enters that number — the stream is at 0 and the crossflow at 0, and neither may change it. What the flow decides is where the points are and what they look like; what the body decides is how many there are of each.

    The count computed on a body

    The rule for a closed surface is usually quoted and seldom solved for. This solves for one, and what the computation adds is not confirmation — it is the discovery that the count survives two events in which the number of stagnation points falls, and that both of them have closed forms.

    part 2 · kinematics
  3. Four kinds of critical point, and the curve that separates them. The invariants of a trace-free velocity gradient, with the discriminant curve 27R²/4 + Q³ = 0 drawn through them. Inside the two upper lobes the cubic has one real root and a complex pair, which is a spiral being stretched along its own axis on the left and squeezed on the right; below the curve all three roots are real and the point is a node with two saddle directions. Of 820 random incompressible gradients, 509 land in the spiral region and 311 in the real one. A plane flow is the vertical line R = 0 and nothing else, which is why a plane has two kinds and space has four. The marked points are the cases the calculation checks that fall inside this window; the two vortex cases it also checks sit at Q = 3.25 and |R| = 4.25, off the top corners, because a window wide enough to hold them would flatten the curve the figure is about.

    Two kinds is a plane flow's privilege

    A plane incompressible flow has a saddle or a centre and nothing else, and the proof is one line about a trace. The same line in three dimensions constrains three numbers instead of two, which is far less, and what it leaves is four kinds of point separated by a curve — with the one a plane cannot have being the structure the whole of turbulence is made from.

    part 3 · kinematics
  4. A pair of points meets on R = 0, the one line an index can change on. The paths of the ABC flow's stagnation points across the (R, Q) diagram as C rises from 0.3 towards √2 with A = B = 1. The four points of index +1 share one path on the left and the four of index −1 its mirror image on the right. At C = 0.3 they sit at R = −0.088, Q = −1.045; at C = 1 they touch the discriminant curve at R = −0.707, Q = −1.500, where the strain has a repeated rate, and turn away from it without crossing; and as C approaches √2 they run in to R = -7.5e-3, Q = −2.000. Crossing into a lobe would have changed a node into a focus, which a Beltrami flow's stagnation point cannot be; reaching R = 0 is where each meets a partner of the other index.

    The sign a stagnation point carries in space

    In three dimensions a stagnation point's index is the sign of one determinant, and that determinant is minus the R of the invariant diagram — so the diagram's left and right halves are the two indices. An exact Euler flow in a periodic box has eight such points, four of each sign, never a spiral among them, and they can only disappear in pairs that meet on the one line where the sign is allowed to change.

    part 4 · kinematics
  5. A stagnation point can leave the flow through the wall, and the wall's point changes kind to pay for it. The heights of the interior stagnation points on the axis of a swirling stagnation flow onto a plate, against the skin friction's spreading rate σ: the lower point, of index +1, and the upper, of index −1; along the wall, the skin-friction focus, a separation of index +1 where σ < 0 and an attachment of index −1 where σ > 0. As σ falls to zero the lower point descends into the wall as z ≈ σ and the wall's focus turns from attachment to separation; as σ rises to one half the two interior points meet at a height of one and vanish. Interior plus half the wall is −½ throughout.

    A stagnation point can leave the flow through the wall, and the count is kept by halves

    A no-slip wall is a sheet of zeros, so the index count that holds for a flow in open space has nothing to count there. Divide the velocity by the height and the wall's zeros shrink to the skin friction's nodes, foci and saddles; reflect the result through the wall and each of them is counted once while every point in the fluid is counted twice. That is why the points on a wall are halves, and an exact swirling flow onto a plate shows the halves doing their job: a stagnation point in the fluid can disappear without a partner by sinking into the wall, where the skin friction's focus changes from attachment to separation to pay for it. A section through the flow sees none of this, because in the section every one of the points is a saddle.

    part 5 · kinematics
  6. A stagnation point hangs above the skin friction's saddle while the saddle is a separation, and is gone once it is not. Streamlines in the plane y = 0 of a wall flow with no axis of symmetry, at μ = 0.4: the wall's saddle of skin friction at x = -0.632, its node at 0.632. An interior stagnation point sits at height 0.15 above x = −0.5, and the saddle is a separation: the flow leaves the wall there.

    A stagnation point off the axis can land only on a saddle or a node, and turns it inside out

    In a swirling flow onto a plate every stagnation point lived on the axis, so one sinking to the wall always met the wall's single critical point. Without the symmetry it might seem free to land anywhere — on an ordinary stretch of skin-friction line, leaving a pair of new points behind. It cannot. Divided by the height, the velocity is continuous down to the wall, where it becomes the skin friction, so a point can only reach the wall where the skin friction already vanishes. It lands on a saddle or a node, and the count does the rest: the point it lands on turns from separation to attachment. An oil-flow picture of the wall, which shows the same pattern before and after, cannot tell which it is looking at.

    part 6 · kinematics

All series