Transonic — the series · Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics

The coefficient of the equation's second derivative, along a chord. The bracket multiplying the streamwise second derivative in the transonic small-disturbance equation, along a chord at Mach 0.85. Where it is positive the equation is elliptic and the flow is subsonic; where it is negative the equation is hyperbolic and the flow is supersonic. Which it is at a given point depends on the perturbation velocity there, which is the thing being solved for. Forty-two per cent of this chord is hyperbolic, and no amount of inspecting the problem beforehand could have said so.

The equation that changes type inside its own answer

Near Mach one the coefficient of the streamwise second derivative depends on the perturbation velocity, which is what is being solved for. Two solutions of the linear equation no longer add — the leftover is three times the term the linear theory keeps — and the critical Mach number approaches one as the two-thirds power of thickness.

part 1 · compressible

Three different flows, drawn on top of one another. The surface pressure of three parabolic arcs of different thickness, each at the Mach number that gives them the same transonic similarity parameter, divided by the scale the similarity rule prescribes. They lie on one curve. The three solutions were computed separately from an equation with different coefficients in each case, and nothing in the solver knows what the parameter is — the scaled peaks differ by 0.01 per cent.

One curve for every thickness

Near Mach one there is no linear theory, so there is no superposition, no scaling of a solution by the thing that caused it, and no shortcut of any kind. There is exactly one thing left — a change of variables in which the thickness and the Mach number vanish and only their combination survives — and it is worth more than the theory that was lost.

part 2 · compressible

A drag that is nothing until there is something to be discontinuous about. The scaled wave drag of a parabolic arc against the similarity parameter. Above about 1.4 it is not small but zero to five decimal places — d'Alembert's paradox, which the small-disturbance equation inherits. Below it the drag rises by four orders of magnitude over a range of the parameter that corresponds to a few hundredths in Mach number, and the only thing that changed is that the flow now contains a shock.

A drag that needs a discontinuity

A closed body in a steady inviscid flow has no drag, and the transonic equation obeys that as faithfully as any other — until a shock appears inside its own answer. Then the same pressure integral that was zero to five decimal places becomes four decades larger, with no viscosity added and nothing about the body changed.

part 3 · compressible

A frequency set almost entirely by how nearly sonic the flow behind the shock is. The Strouhal number of the loop against the local Mach number behind the shock. The band drawn across it is what is measured on aerofoils in buffet, 0.06 to 0.08, and the arithmetic meets it at a post-shock Mach number of 0.971. Two per cent either side of that number changes the frequency by a third, which is why buffet onset is predicted by correlation rather than by calculation.

A shock that will not stand still

A converged transonic solution puts the shock in a definite place. Over a band of conditions the real one sweeps back and forth across a fifth of the chord at a fixed frequency, and the period is set almost entirely by how nearly sonic the flow just behind it is — a quantity that is small, hard to compute, and multiplies everything.

part 4 · compressible