Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Series

Two-dimensional — the series

2 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. 80 per cent of the energy goes to the larger scale. One unit of energy is taken out of the middle wavenumber and shared between its two neighbours. Two conservation laws decide the split completely: the energy must add up, and so must the enstrophy, which weights each wavenumber by k². For (1, 2, 4) the answer is that 80.0 per cent of the energy goes up in scale and 80.0 per cent of the enstrophy goes down. There is no model of turbulence anywhere in that: it is two linear equations in two unknowns, and it is why a two-dimensional flow organises itself into large vortices while its gradients get finer.

    The cascade that runs backwards

    Three-dimensional turbulence carries energy from large scales to small ones and dissipates it. Take away one dimension and the term that does it vanishes identically, a second quantity becomes conserved, and two conservation laws between them force the energy to go the other way — up in scale, into ever larger vortices.

    part 1 · turbulence
  2. The condensate, and the limit of no friction which does not exist. In a steady state the friction must remove everything the forcing puts in, so the energy is eps/(2 alpha) and the coherent velocity is sqrt(eps/alpha) — exactly a minus one half power, checked to 10⁻¹². As the friction is weakened the condensate grows without bound: the limit alpha to zero is not a flow with a weak condensate, it is a flow with no steady state at all.

    Where the inverse cascade stops

    Two-dimensional turbulence sends its energy upward in scale, and the upward direction has an end: the box. Without something to remove the energy before it arrives, it accumulates there in a pair of vortices filling the domain, and the limit of no friction has no steady state at all.

    part 2 · turbulence

All series