Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Series

Womersley — the series

4 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. α = 13.0: a plug in the middle and everything happening at the wall. The velocity profile at eight phases of one cycle, at a Womersley number of 13.0 — the human aorta's at rest. The core moves almost as a solid plug, because viscosity cannot reach it within a cycle; all the shear is in a layer of thickness √(ν/ω) = 0.77 mm against a radius of 10.0 mm. At some phases the fluid near the wall is moving backwards while the core still moves forward, which is the reversal a Poiseuille profile can never show and which is routinely measured in arteries.

    Too fast for a profile

    A pipe carrying a steady flow has a parabolic profile. Make the pressure oscillate and one number decides whether it still does — and above about ten the core moves as a plug, a quarter of a cycle behind the pressure, with the fastest fluid in a ring near the wall rather than on the axis.

    part 1 · regimes
  2. Where a profile stops being a parabola. Two measures of how far Womersley's solution has left the quasi-steady parabola, against the Womersley number, both logarithmic. The amplitude deficit reaches a hundredth at α = 0.28 and the phase lag reaches a hundredth of a right angle at α = 0.22 — both well below α = 1, which is where the unsteady and viscous terms are equal and is the value the number is named for. By α = 1 itself the flow is already a tenth short and eight degrees late.

    Where the parabola goes

    A pipe carrying a steady flow has a parabolic profile, and the Womersley number is supposed to say when an oscillating one still does. For the flow rate it is very nearly honest — one per cent at α = 0.91 — and for the phase it is out by a factor of three, because a lag is second order in the number and an amplitude deficit is fourth.

    part 2 · regimes
  3. A wave that travels and a wave that spreads. A harmonic pressure wave's amplitude and its instantaneous value along a tube, over two wavelengths of the inviscid wave, at four Womersley numbers. At α = 15 the wave marches on, a little weaker each wavelength. At α = 5 it is visibly damped. At α = 2 it is nearly gone within a wavelength. At α = 0.5 there is no wave to speak of: the disturbance falls away within a small fraction of the inviscid wavelength, as heat does into a wall.

    The pulse that has to travel

    In a rigid tube the Womersley number decides the shape of an oscillating flow. Make the wall elastic and the pressure pulse has to travel, a second number appears — the tube's length in wavelengths — and the first number turns out to decide something more basic than the profile: whether the tube carries a wave at all, or only a disturbance that spreads like heat.

    part 3 · regimes
  4. One number decides which pulse grows. The pressure pulse and the flow pulse at the far end of the tube, each as a multiple of its value at the entrance, against the load's reflection coefficient. A load that reflects pressure with the same sign — a stiffer or narrower continuation — amplifies the pressure pulse and damps the flow pulse. One that reflects it inverted — a wider continuation, or many branches — does the opposite. With no reflection both fall slightly, by the wave's own attenuation. The two curves cross near Γ = 0 and pull apart on either side.

    The pulse that grows as it leaves the heart

    The pressure pulse measured at the wrist is larger than the pulse in the aorta that drives it, and the flow pulse is smaller. Nothing downstream is pumping. A wave reflected from the end of an elastic tube arrives back in step with the outgoing wave near the end and out of step near the start, and a single number — the reflection coefficient — decides whether it is the pressure or the flow that grows.

    part 4 · regimes

All series