Regime
Set by the θ–β–M relation — oblique shocks, and a deflection budget
Every figure drawn under this hypothesis — 8 of them — with the essay each one belongs to and the generator that drew it.
8 figure placements state this regime. The strip along the foot of every figure names two things — the model that produced it and the regime it holds in — and this listing is read back out of the finished drawing rather than from what produced it.
- When a shock cannot bounce — M∞ = 4, γ = 1.4 — the shock angles are solved, the wall is schematic · reactive-shock · hero
- When a shock cannot bounce — M∞ = 4, γ = 1.4 — the second shock's budget is what runs out · reactive-shock
- When a shock cannot bounce — M∞ = 4, γ = 1.4 — the shock angles are solved, the wall is schematic · reactive-shock
- When a shock cannot bounce — M∞ = 4, θ_w = 30°, γ = 1.4 · reactive-shock
- When a shock cannot bounce — M∞ = 4, γ = 1.4 · reactive-shock
- When a shock cannot bounce — M∞ = 6, γ = 1.4 — the second shock's budget is what runs out · reactive-shock
- When a shock cannot bounce — M∞ = 4, γ = 1.4 — the loop is the domain, not a measurement of one experiment · reactive-shock
- When a shock cannot bounce — M∞ = 6, γ = 1.4 — the loop is the domain, not a measurement of one experiment · reactive-shock