Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Theme

The thread: What is conserved — page 13

Page 13 of 33, continuing through the 292 essays this motif runs through.

292 essays carry this thread — page 13 of 33.

Nothing can deliver more than h/H, and here that is 10.0%. The fraction of the supply a ram can deliver, against the height it is asked to deliver to, from a supply falling 2 m. The upper curve is the exact ceiling h/H, which follows from the energy audit with every loss set to zero and can be reached by no real machine; the lower one is what a ram at 65% efficiency actually sends. Asking for twice the height halves the delivery, exactly, and there is no design that escapes it. Fluids at work

A pump with no engine

A hydraulic ram lifts water uphill using nothing but the water that is already falling. It has one moving part and no power supply, and everything it can and cannot do follows from an energy audit that fits on one line — including a ceiling nothing about its design can move.

 Ballistic first, diffusive later. The mean square displacement of a parcel carried by a fluctuating velocity, from Taylor's 1921 integral with an exponential correlation of time scale 1. Below the correlation time it follows the straight-line law u²t² exactly — the parcel has not yet changed its mind — and above it the curve joins the diffusion law 2u²T·t, offset by the head start the ballistic phase gave it. The eddy diffusivity is u²T = 1.000, and it is a property of the correlation rather than of any equation of motion. Transition and turbulence

How far a parcel gets

Turbulent transport is one integral. A parcel carried by a fluctuating velocity goes in a straight line while it still remembers its own motion and performs a random walk once it has forgotten, and the crossover is the correlation time — so an eddy diffusivity is not a property a flow has, it is the limit of a measurement that has run for long enough.

 The error in the balance is the number itself. The fractional error in the geostrophic wind, against the Rossby number, on logarithmic axes. It is a straight line of slope one through the origin, and that is not an approximation: keeping the centripetal term gives V_g/V = 1 ± Ro exactly, so the error and the number are the same quantity. The geostrophic wind is one per cent right at Ro = 0.01 and a hundred per cent wrong at Ro = 1, which is the value the number is named for and is quoted as the boundary of the approximation. Regimes and numbers

The balance that is its own error

Geostrophic balance is licensed by the Rossby number being small, and the fractional error in the geostrophic wind is the Rossby number — exactly, not approximately. So the balance everybody uses at Ro of order one is a hundred per cent wrong, and the same quadratic has a hard limit at a quarter that no anticyclone can pass.

 Four aeroplanes, one number. Four biplanes with the same gap and the same loadings, staggered by nothing, by four tenths, by nine tenths and by one and six tenths of a chord. Their induced drags agree to the last bit of the arithmetic — the calculation cannot even express the stagger, because the Trefftz plane is a cross-section and everything drawn here projects onto the same one. That is Munk's stagger theorem, and stating it as the drag is unchanged understates it: there is no place in the computation where the stagger could be entered. Circulation and lift

Two wings and it does not matter where

Move one wing of a biplane a chord forward and the induced drag does not change. Not approximately, not to a good approximation — the calculation that gives the induced drag has nowhere to put the stagger, because everything projects onto the same cross-section of the wake.

 The parabola is the cheapest shape the walls allow. The dissipation of the profile u = A(1 − |y/h|ⁿ) carrying a fixed flux between fixed walls, against the exponent n, divided by the parabola's. Every member of the family satisfies the same boundary conditions and carries the same fluid; they differ only in shape. The minimum is at n = 2 exactly, which is not a coincidence — it is Helmholtz's theorem, and the parabola is a solution of the equations because it is the least dissipative shape rather than the other way round. Viscosity

The cheapest shape the walls allow

The parabola in a pipe is usually presented as what the equations give. It is better understood the other way round — of every profile that could carry that flow between those walls, it is the one that destroys the least energy, and the equations give it for that reason.

 The hodograph plane, where the unknown boundary is the known one. The same flow drawn in the plane of its own velocity, ζ = (u − iv)/U. The plate, whose shape is known in the physical plane, becomes a segment of the imaginary axis; the axis of symmetry becomes a segment of the real one; and the free streamline — whose shape nobody knows — becomes an arc of the unit circle, because the speed on it is exactly the free stream. The unknown and the known have changed places, which is why the problem can be solved at all. Ideal flow

Where the unknown boundary is the known one

A free surface is the hardest kind of boundary — its shape is part of the answer, so the region the problem is posed in is not known until the problem is solved. Draw the same flow in the plane of its own velocity and the shape becomes an arc of a circle, known in advance and exactly.

 A flow that is incompressible and carries a density that varies three to one. Ideal flow past a cylinder, shaded by a density that is constant along each streamline and runs from one to three across the field. Every parcel keeps the density it started with, so the divergence is zero — measured at 10⁻¹⁰, which is the differencing — and the flow is incompressible in the only sense the word has. The density is not uniform anywhere. Incompressible is a statement about what the flow does to a parcel's volume, not about what the fluid is made of. Flows and fields

Incompressible is not a property of the fluid

A flow whose density varies three to one across it, with a divergence of 10⁻¹⁰ everywhere. And a flow of air at Mach 0.1, whose divergence is three per cent of U/a and which every textbook calls incompressible. The word is about what the flow does to a parcel's volume, and about nothing else.

 A curved shock, and the entropy each streamline picks up crossing it. A parabolic bow shock ahead of a blunt nose at Mach six, with the streamlines drawn arriving horizontally and a marker at each crossing whose size is the total pressure lost there. The streamline through the nose crosses a normal shock and keeps three per cent of its total pressure; one four nose radii out crosses at fourteen degrees and keeps ninety-four per cent. Every streamline gets a different entropy, and the stagnation enthalpy is the same on all of them. Compressible flow

The spin a shock leaves behind

A curved shock gives every streamline a different entropy rise and the same stagnation enthalpy. Crocco's theorem then forces vorticity into a flow with no viscosity anywhere — and it scales as the inverse of the shock's radius of curvature, exactly, so a straight shock makes none.

 A pump curve out of the momentum theorem. The pressure an ejector delivers, against how much it is entraining, at a fixed nozzle. It has the shape of every pump characteristic ever measured — a shut-off pressure with no flow, falling to no pressure at free delivery — and it was obtained from a momentum balance on a tube with nothing in it. The shut-off value here is 36.0 kPa and the machine at its best power runs at 4.56 times its own motive flow. Fluids at work

Mixing is a pump

Two streams at different speeds mixing in a tube destroy energy — the same Borda–Carnot expression a handbook prints beside a sudden enlargement, with two streams in it instead of one. And while they destroy it the pressure rises, which makes the loss the mechanism of a machine with no moving parts.

All themes