Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Theme

The thread: What is conserved — page 18

Page 18 of 33, continuing through the 292 essays this motif runs through.

292 essays carry this thread — page 18 of 33.

The velocity through a shock at Mach two, as a function of position. The Becker profile, integrated outwards from its own inflection point. It runs from the upstream velocity to the downstream one — the two states the jump conditions give, which appear here as the equilibria of a first-order differential equation — and its steepest gradient matches the closed form to one part in ten thousand. The horizontal axis is in units of the thickness, which for this shock is 139 nanometres. Compressible flow

The discontinuity that has a thickness

The jump conditions do not contain the viscosity, which is why they are exact. The thickness is entirely viscosity — 289 nanometres at Mach 1.5, 35 at Mach 5, against a mean free path of 64. At Mach five the continuum equations have produced a structure thinner than the distance between collisions.

 Four sets of scaling exponents, all of them exact at the third moment. zeta_p against p for K41, the beta-model, the log-normal model and She–Leveque. Every one of them passes through zeta_3 = 1 exactly, because the four-fifths law is a consequence of the equations and a model that missed it would be wrong about the one thing that is known. What they disagree about is every other moment. Transition and turbulence

The exponents that stop being thirds

Kolmogorov's 1941 theory says every moment of the velocity difference scales with the same exponent, p over three, so the distribution keeps its shape at every scale. It does not. The exponents fall below the line, by more the higher the moment, and what the departure measures is a dimension.

 And the net drift, which is where they disagree. The Stokes drift plus each return flow. All three drift forward at the surface, because the Stokes drift there swamps any return current of the right size. Below that they part company completely: the uniform current has most of the column moving upstream, and the two that satisfy no slip have almost none of it. The reversal depths span 77 per cent of the water column. Flows and fields

The drift a closed box will not allow

A wave in a wave tank carries mass forward, and the tank has nowhere to put it. So a return current appears carrying exactly the opposite transport — exactly, from mass conservation and nothing else. Which fixes a total and leaves the answer anybody wants entirely open.

 The backwater curve behind a weir. The depth at the control is 1.6 times the normal depth; integrating upstream the profile relaxes onto normal depth over about seven hundred metres and stays there. That relaxation is the reach forgetting the weir, and nothing about the weir survives past it. Fluids at work

The section that decides the river

A reach of open channel has a normal depth and a critical depth, and the water has neither. What it has is a profile obeying a first-order equation, which needs exactly one condition — and whether that condition belongs at the upstream end or the downstream end is not a choice, because the equation is stable in one direction and unstable in the other.

 A high tail buys a second trim point, at 31.52 degrees. The pitching moment of two layouts against incidence, with the stable trim points marked. Both cross zero with a negative slope near 0.76°, which is the ordinary cruise trim. Past the stall the conventional layout's tail is caught only glancingly by the wake and its moment stays nose-down, so it has no second crossing; the T-tail's tail is swept into the wake and sees 12 per cent of the dynamic pressure, its download collapses, and the wing's own nose-up moment carries the curve back across zero at 31.52°. That second crossing is stable — the slope there is negative too — which means an aircraft that reaches it stays there. What is taught wrongly

A stall that is a place

A stall is an event, and the usual accounts treat it as one — a boundary reached, a damping lost. A high tailplane makes it something else. Swept into the wing's wake, the tail loses the download that held the nose up, and the aircraft finds a second stable trim point thirty degrees past the stall from which the elevator cannot bring it back.

 A fifth of the drag power is not heat yet. The energy account of towing a flat plate a metre long through air at thirty metres a second. The power it takes is the drag times the speed. The heat made inside the boundary layer is half the free-stream energy times the energy thickness, and it is less — 78.6 per cent of what was paid. The rest has not been destroyed: it is kinetic energy still in the wake, which will become heat somewhere downstream, in fluid that is no longer touching the plate. Viscosity

The third thickness

A boundary layer has no edge, so every thickness quoted for it is an integral of the profile against some weight. Two of them are famous. The third answers a question the other two cannot — how much of the power spent towing a plate has actually become heat by the time the fluid leaves it — and the answer is 78.6 per cent.

 A sinusoid, distorting on its way to a shock. A finite-amplitude sound wave at four fractions of the distance to shock formation, computed by inverting the implicit simple-wave solution. Each point of the waveform travels at its own speed, so the compressions catch up with the rarefactions ahead of them and the profile leans forward. At σ = 1 the front is vertical. The linear theory says the first panel is the answer at every distance, for ever. Compressible flow

Every compression becomes a shock in the end

Linear acoustics has no time scale in it, which is the sign that something has been thrown away. A 120-decibel tone shocks after three hundred metres and a jet engine after twenty; the distance goes exactly as the reciprocal of the amplitude, and nothing is exempt.

 The mean flux, flat across the inertial shells and equal to the dissipation. The time-averaged transfer out of the first n shells, computed as the rate at which the nonlinearity changes their energy rather than from a remembered formula. It is constant to a tenth across the middle of the ladder and equal to the dissipation, which is the cascade — and it is an average. Transition and turbulence

A flux that runs both ways

The cascade is a statement about a mean. Kolmogorov's four-fifths law fixes an average and the constant flux through the inertial range is an average, and neither says anything about what the transfer is doing at any instant — which turns out to be running backwards a substantial part of the time.

 A uniform scalar in a fluid at rest, under two face rules. Nothing is flowing and the scalar starts at one everywhere. The swept-volume rule leaves it at one to the last bit, at every step of the two time units. The midpoint rule moves it by two parts in ten thousand, on a mesh motion that begins and ends in the same place, and the excursion looks exactly like a physical transient. Flows and fields

The mesh that makes its own mass

The transport theorem holds for a region moving at any velocity, which is what makes a moving-mesh calculation possible. Discretised carelessly it is not an identity but an approximation, and a fluid at rest with a uniform density then gains density from the motion of a grid — smoothly, plausibly, and looking exactly like a physical transient.

All themes