Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Theme

The thread: What is conserved — page 4

Page 4 of 33, continuing through the 292 essays this motif runs through.

292 essays carry this thread — page 4 of 33.

The throat stops listening: mass flow against back pressure. Mass flow through a convergent nozzle, normalised on its choked value, as the back pressure is lowered. It rises until the throat reaches Mach one and then stops, exactly. Below that pressure the throat is sonic and nothing downstream can send a signal upstream to ask for more, so the flow does not respond however far the back pressure falls. Compressible flow

The throat that stops listening

Lower the pressure downstream of a nozzle and more gas flows through it. Keep lowering it and, at a definite point, the flow stops responding — not gradually, but completely, because the news that the pressure has fallen can no longer travel upstream.

 The starting vortex, and the circulation it pays for. A wing that has just begun to lift, and the vortex it shed as it started. The circulation round the wing and the circulation round the shed vortex are equal and opposite, so a circuit large enough to contain both has no circulation at all — which is what Kelvin's theorem requires of a circuit that began at rest. Circulation and lift

The vortex a wing leaves behind

A wing at rest has no circulation. A wing in flight has a great deal. Circulation round a circuit of fluid particles cannot change, so the difference had to come from somewhere — and it did, as an equal and opposite vortex dropped on the runway.

 Ten unknowns, four equations. What is left after the Navier–Stokes equations are averaged. The mean velocities and mean pressure were there before; the six Reynolds stresses are new, and they arrived from the one term that does not average away. Nothing in the count is an approximation — the averaged equations are exact — and that is what makes the gap uncomfortable. Transition and turbulence

What averaging costs

Split the velocity into a mean and a fluctuation, average the equations, and the result is exact. It is also short of six equations, because the one nonlinear term does not average away and leaves six new unknowns behind that nothing determines.

 Flow net — a stream past a cylinder. Two families of curves drawn over the same flow: the streamlines, along which the streamfunction is constant, and the equipotentials, along which the velocity potential is constant. They cross at right angles at every point, because they are the two parts of a single analytic function of position. Ideal flow

Bodies made out of nothing

Put a source in a stream and a solid nose appears in front of it. Put a sink downstream of the source and the nose closes into a finite body. Nothing was placed in the fluid — the surface is a level set of a function, and it behaves like a wall because nothing crosses it.

 One nozzle, five back pressures, five different flows. The duct above, and the static pressure along it below, computed station by station from the local area. Where a shock stands inside the divergent section its position was solved for rather than placed: the shock spends total pressure, which sets the subsonic Mach number at the exit, which has to match the imposed back pressure. Compressible flow

One area, two answers

The area of a duct at a station fixes the Mach number there — twice over. A ratio of 2.5 is satisfied at Mach 0.24 and again at Mach 2.44, nothing local chooses between them, and where the choice cannot be made consistently a shock appears inside the duct to join the two.

 Every rung of the hierarchy is worse than the last. Writing a transport equation for the Reynolds stress does not close the system: that equation contains the triple correlation, whose equation contains the quadruple. The bars are the number of independent components at each order and the number of new unknowns its own equations introduce. The second is always larger, and the gap widens. Transition and turbulence

The ladder that never closes

Being six equations short is a problem with an obvious remedy — derive six more. The remedy works, produces an exact equation for the Reynolds stress, and leaves ten new unknowns behind. The gap does not narrow at any level, and the counting says why.

 The number on a streamline is a flow rate. Two streamlines and a crooked line drawn between them. The volume of fluid crossing that line every second, integrated from the velocity field, is the difference between the two streamfunction values at its ends — which is what makes a streamline a label rather than merely a curve. Flows and fields

The number on a streamline is a flow rate

Streamlines get drawn as decoration — curves the flow follows, spaced however the plotting looked best. Each one carries a number, the difference between two of those numbers is the volume of fluid passing between them every second, and it does not matter what route the measurement takes.

 Two depths, and a gap the model will not describe. The surface either side of a hydraulic jump at an arriving Froude number of 5.05. Both depths are exact consequences of the momentum balance. The distance between them is not: the shallow-water model has no length scale in it and cannot say how far the transition takes, so the region between the two levels is left blank and the six-depth rule of thumb beside it is somebody's measurement rather than this site's result. Fluids at work

The shock in a river

Shallow water is a gas whose ratio of specific heats is two. The white water below a weir is a shock wave, momentum is conserved across it exactly, energy is not, and one direction is forbidden for the same reason an expansion shock is forbidden — which makes the analogy exact to first order and wrong at the second.

 Creeping flow, and the same body with inertia. The exact creeping-flow solution beside a solved field at a Reynolds number where inertia matters. The creeping flow is a mirror image of itself front to back — a photograph of it run backwards is a photograph of it — and the field with inertia has a wake, which is what a direction of time looks like. Regimes and numbers

The world with no inertia

Drop the viscosity and the equations become exactly solvable and wrong about drag. Drop the inertia instead and they become exactly solvable again — and for a cylinder in an unbounded fluid there is no solution at all, which took fifty years to notice and longer to fix.

All themes