Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Theme

The thread: What is conserved — page 7

Page 7 of 33, continuing through the 292 essays this motif runs through.

292 essays carry this thread — page 7 of 33.

Two of opposite sign go somewhere. Two vortices of equal and opposite strength. Each is carried by the other's field, both are carried the same way, and the pair travels in a straight line at Γ/2πd forever, keeping its separation exactly. The speed is a consequence of one vortex's field evaluated at the other, and nothing else. Ideal flow

Vortices move each other

A vortex alone in an infinite fluid sits exactly still, forever — its own field is antisymmetric about it and there is nothing at its centre to be carried by. Everything a vortex does, another vortex did, and two of them already exhaust what can be written down.

 A millionth, doubling every three-quarters of a second. The separation of two trajectories started a millionth apart, on log axes against time. It grows as a straight line until it saturates at the size of the attractor, and the slope of that line is the largest Lyapunov exponent — measured here on the system by renormalising a nearby pair, not quoted. Sensitive dependence is what the straightness of the line means. Transition and turbulence

A millionth is enough

Two trajectories a millionth apart separate by a factor of e every three-quarters of a second, so a millionfold improvement in the measurement buys about ten seconds of extra prediction. That exchange rate, and not the size of the error, is what limits forecasting.

 The speed depends on the core; the slope does not. A ring's self-induced speed against the logarithm of the cutoff used to compute it. The line is a quadrature of the reduced integral; the dots are an independent sum of cross products over a hundred and twenty thousand straight segments. Both diverge as the cutoff is thinned — a filament of zero thickness would move infinitely fast — so no answer here is a ring's speed until a core model is chosen. The slope, Γ/4πR, is the same whatever is chosen, and is what the check measures. Circulation and lift

A ring moves because it is bent

A straight vortex filament induces exactly no velocity on itself — every element's direction is parallel to the line joining it to the point being evaluated, and the cross product is zero. Bend it into a ring and it drives itself forward, at a speed that diverges logarithmically as the core is thinned.

 A boundary layer with no x in it. The velocity profile over a porous wall with uniform suction: U(1 − e^{−Vy/ν}), exactly, at every station along the wall. The displacement thickness is ν/V, the momentum thickness is half of it, and the shape factor is two — all of them constants, none of them a function of distance. It is the cleanest demonstration there is that a boundary layer's thickness is a balance rather than an accumulation. Viscosity

The layer that stops growing

Blasius' boundary layer thickens as the square root of distance and never stops. Suck fluid through the wall at a uniform rate and it stops immediately — the profile becomes a single exponential with no x anywhere in it, and the friction comes out exactly equal to the momentum of the fluid that was taken away.

 Two bills, and the radius that settles them. The cost of a vessel against its radius: the pumping power, which falls as the inverse fourth power, and the price of owning the fluid and the wall, which rises as the square. Their sum has a minimum, found here by golden-section search and agreeing with the closed form to eight figures. At that radius the pumping bill is exactly a third of the total — for every set of constants, because it follows from the two exponents alone. Fluids at work

The radius that costs least

A vessel that carries a flow costs two things to own — the power to push fluid along it and the price of the tissue itself. Minimising the sum gives a best radius, the best radius makes flow proportional to radius cubed, and the rule that follows is a statement about a photograph that came out of a cost function.

 The same 10° turn, taken both ways. A supersonic stream turned away from itself expands through a fan of Mach waves and keeps every bit of its total pressure. Turned into itself through the same angle it shocks, and pays. Nothing in the equations distinguishes the two cases except the sign of the angle: compression waves converge and steepen into a front, expansion waves diverge and spread. Compressible flow

Turning the other way is free

Compression through ten degrees at Mach 2 costs 1.54 per cent of the total pressure. Expansion through the same ten degrees costs exactly nothing — not approximately nothing, nothing — and the two are the same equations with the sign of one angle changed.

 Lift and wave drag on a flat plate at Mach 2, exactly and to first order. The lift and wave-drag coefficients of a supersonic section against incidence, computed face by face from shocks and fans, with Ackeret's linear result dashed over them. The two agree to three decimal places at small angles and part company slowly — which is what a first-order theory is supposed to do, and evidence rather than tautology, since the two routes share no algebra. Compressible flow

Drag with nothing to rub

d'Alembert's paradox says a closed body in a steady, inviscid flow has no drag, and four essays on this site argue it and none of them is wrong. Above Mach one it is false — the flow is still inviscid, still steady, and the drag is real, finite and quadratic in incidence.

 20.45 MPa out of a film 25 µm thick. The pressure along a tapered pad, from the closed-form solution of Reynolds' equation, with the same equation's tridiagonal grid solve drawn over it as points. The peak is 20.45 MPa — enough to yield mild steel — and it sits at 69 per cent of the way along rather than in the middle, because the pressure gradient vanishes where the film equals the harmonic mean of its two ends and the harmonic mean is biased towards the thinner one. The pad's own shape is drawn along the top, to a vertical scale of its own. Nothing pumps this oil: the runner drags it into a narrowing gap and the gap does the rest. Viscosity

Nothing but the shape of the gap

A machine that holds a steel shaft off its bearing with a film of oil twenty-five microns thick has no pump in it, and the pressure it generates would yield mild steel. The mechanism is not the oil and not the speed; it is that the gap narrows.

 The lift does not arrive when the incidence does. Bound circulation against distance travelled, in units of the settled value. The wing starts far short of its final lift and takes tens of chords to collect the rest, because every scrap of circulation it takes has to be paid for with an opposite vortex shed behind it, and that vortex's own downwash holds the wing back until it is far away. Wagner's exact 1925 answer is drawn beside the model in the colour this site keeps for a borrowed claim: the shapes agree and the model is slower, by about a fifth at its worst. Circulation and lift

The lift that arrives late

A wing set into motion does not have its lift. Every scrap of circulation it takes has to be paid for by shedding an equal and opposite vortex behind it, and until that debt is far downstream its own downwash holds the wing back — for tens of chords, not for an instant.

All themes