Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Theme

The thread: Lift is circulation — page 9

Page 9 of 9, continuing through the 81 essays this motif runs through.

81 essays carry this thread — page 9 of 9.

Four vortices bend twice as fast, on shorter waves. Growth rate of the fastest bending wave against its wavelength, both in the units of the equivalent single pair — one unit of growth is one e-fold in the time the wake sinks by its own spacing. Crow's pair grows at most at 0.827, at 8.54 spacings. A flap vortex of 0.3 of the tip's strength at 0.4 of its station keeps a Crow band just below that and adds a second, at 1.57 and 1.8 spacings; one of 0.5 at 0.3 merges the two into one band peaking at 1.64 and 4.4 spacings. Circulation and lift

Four vortices bend faster, and bend the wrong one

With its flaps down a wing sheds four vortices, not two: a strong one at each tip and a weaker one at each flap's edge, and on each side the two circle one another as the wake sinks. The orbit makes the wake unstable at waves a fifth of Crow's length, growing twice as fast. But the wave that grows is the weak flap vortex being bent round the strong tip vortex, which hardly moves, while the long bend that pinches the tips together grows no faster than before. Only a counter-rotating inner vortex makes the whole wake unstable, and it does so at every wavelength.

 A follower can wander further fore and aft than sideways. A flapping follower's saving, averaged over a wander of its place with the standard deviation shown, as a fraction of its own induced drag: fore and aft, holding the phase that suits its average place, for tips swinging a tenth, a fifth and four-tenths of a span; and sideways, beating in phase. The saving in place is 0.837. Sideways it has halved at a wander of 0.185 spans; fore and aft, with a fifth-span swing, only at 0.804, a third of the wake's wavelength, and with the four-tenths a cruising bird swings, at 0.37. With a tenth-span swing it never halves. Circulation and lift

A flapping follower can drift fore and aft, but not sideways

A bird in a flapping V has to be in the right place and beat at the right phase for that place, and no bird holds its place exactly. Drifting fore and aft costs it phase, at a full beat for every wavelength of the wake; drifting sideways takes it off the leader's tip vortex. The first is two to four times cheaper than the second, it can be bought back by re-timing the beat within about one beat of the drift, and the second cannot be bought back at all. So the precision a follower needs is sideways, and the attention it needs is on its timing.

 No elevon acts through more than a quarter of the chord. The distance behind the quarter chord at which the load an elevon adds acts — its arm — against the elevon's share of the chord. A vanishing tab at the trailing edge has an arm of exactly a quarter chord; a tenth-chord elevon 0.217, a fifth 0.185, a third 0.145, half 0.0972, and a flap of the whole chord, which is simply a change of incidence, none. However far aft the hinge, the deflection loads the whole chord and most of the load sits near the leading edge. Circulation and lift

No elevon reaches past a quarter chord

A wing with no tail trims itself with the back of its own section, and the back of a section is a short lever. Thin-aerofoil theory prices it exactly: the load an elevon adds acts at most a quarter of a chord behind the quarter-chord point, however small and far aft the elevon is. So every unit of trim moment costs at least four units of lift, where a tail three chords back costs a third, and a camber change shaped as a pure couple would cost nothing.

 An elliptic wing filters the gust like a round aperture. How much of a gust component with spanwise wavenumber k₂ survives the span average, against κ = k₂b/2, for three weights. A uniform strip is a slit and its filter is sinc², falling as κ⁻² between its zeros. An elliptic loading is a circular aperture and its filter is the Airy pattern (2J₁(κ)/κ)², whose first zero is at 3.83 and whose envelope falls as κ⁻³, but which stays near one to larger κ: the ellipse's weight is narrower, so its filter is wider. A rectangular wing of aspect ratio nine weights the span by its own loading and lies between, with the ellipse's κ⁻³ fall because its loading too goes to zero at the tips as a square root. Circulation and lift

A wing averages a gust through its own loading

A finite span averages a turbulent gust and so tames the load it causes, but it does not average uniformly. The reverse-flow theorem says exactly how it weights the span: by the loading the wing makes at a uniform incidence. An elliptic wing therefore filters the gust the way a round aperture diffracts light, passes eight per cent more of its short scales than a uniform strip, and crosses its mean load up to four per cent more often.

 A lagged re-timing passes no error down the V. The variance of each bird's phase error, in radians squared, against its place in one arm of a V, for fore-and-aft wander of half a span correlated over four beats. Holding a fixed phase, every bird's error is its offset from the bird ahead, 3.16. Re-timing with a one-beat lag, every bird's error is 0.632 — the first follower's and the thirtieth's alike, to the last digit. Re-timing as smoothly but through two half-beat lags, the error grows from 0.819 at the first follower to 1.05 at the tenth and 1.08 at the thirtieth, and is still growing slowly there. Circulation and lift

A wandering flock passes no error down the V

In a flapping V every bird re-times its beat to the wake of the bird ahead, whose own beat is imperfectly timed, so the errors ought to pile up along the arm. With the simplest way of re-timing they do not, at all: the thirtieth bird is off its phase by exactly as much as the first. A one-beat lag and its complement add to one at every frequency, and that identity telescopes the whole arm. Re-time more smoothly and the errors do accumulate — by about a third, and then they stop.

 Lift takes the launch angle down far faster than drag does. The best launch angle against β for a ball whose lift is a fixed fraction ℓ of its drag, from ℓ = 0 — the drag-only curve — to ℓ = 1. At β = 10 drag alone puts the best angle at 32.6°; a lift-to-drag ratio of 0.4 takes it to 15.9° and 0.8 makes a level launch best. Once the curve reaches zero it stays there: the lift lifts the ball, and any angle given at launch is height the lift would have bought for less drag. Fluids at work

A spinning ball should leave low

Drag alone takes a ball's best launch angle from 45° to the high thirties at the speeds sport is played at. Backspin takes it into the teens, because a ball with lift is a glider and a glider buys its height with lift rather than with angle. Every tenth of lift-to-drag ratio takes a fixed slice off the angle, and above a line that depends on the launch speed the best flight leaves the ground level.

 The camber lines that carry them. The camber lines that carry the four loads at their ideal angles, heights in chords at a design lift coefficient of one. The uniform load's line is symmetric about mid-chord, 5.52% high; tapering the load over the last fifth moves the peak to 0.515 of the chord and raises it to 6.79%; tapering it over the whole chord, a = 0, puts the peak at 0.323. Circulation and lift

A load carried to the trailing edge needs a hook

Thin-aerofoil theory runs backwards: ask for a chordwise load and it returns the camber line that carries it. Ask for the simplest load of all, the same everywhere, and the line comes back with a vertical tangent at both ends. The one at the nose is the price of a clean entry; the one at the tail is the Kutta condition being broken, and the hook it makes is what a Gurney flap is. Every NACA a-series line is a way of not paying it.

 The parcel over the top arrives first, and never waits for the other. Two parcels released together far upstream, a whisker above and below the streamline that divides at the nose of a Joukowski section 11.8% thick at 4°. Both crawl past the nose; then the upper one is carried over the top faster and reaches the far line 1.13 time units ahead — 0.279 chord-transit times — against the 1.59 that the circulation divided by the speed squared predicts. Behind the section they travel on side by side at the stream's speed and the gap between them never closes. What is taught wrongly

The upper parcel leads by the circulation

Transit time looked like a quantity that could not be measured: a parcel released near the dividing streamline crawls past the nose for as long as one likes. The difference between two parcels' transit times, one either side of that streamline, does not crawl. It converges, and on a thin section it is the circulation divided by the square of the speed — the lift, measured in seconds. The upper parcel arrives first by that much, and behind the wing the two never close the gap.

 A washed-out rectangular wing is at its best at one lift coefficient. The span efficiency of a rectangular wing of aspect ratio 8 against lift coefficient, untwisted and with 2°, 4° and 6° of washout. Untwisted, it is 0.9367 at every lift coefficient. Each washout has one lift coefficient where it is best — 0.254, 0.509 and 0.763 — proportional to the twist, and each reaches the same peak, 0.9911, there. Below the peak the efficiency falls fast. Circulation and lift

Washout is right at one lift coefficient

A twisted wing's loading is the sum of two shapes in a proportion that changes with speed, so its induced drag is a parabola in lift coefficient with its least at one design point, and that point moves in proportion to the twist. On a rectangular wing four degrees of washout puts it at a lift coefficient of 0.51 and recovers almost all the span efficiency the planform lost. On a well-tapered wing the same four degrees puts it at nineteen, and the washout is a drag paid at every speed for the stall alone.

All themes