Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Theme

The thread: One number decides the regime — page 21

Page 21 of 34, continuing through the 305 essays this motif runs through.

305 essays carry this thread — page 21 of 34.

Six orbits that do not close. One parcel's path under a linear deep-water wave of steepness 0.05, at a fifth of a wavelength down, released at the phase that centres the orbit on its release depth. Each loop returns almost to where it began and not quite. Flows and fields

A drift made of two things that average to zero

Stokes drift is usually explained as a parcel spending longer in the forward half of its orbit. That is true and it is not a formula. The formula is a correlation between a displacement and a gradient, each of which averages to exactly nothing, and it splits into two halves that are equal to twelve figures.

 When the tracer leaves, given when it went in. The residence-time distribution of three beds with the same mean residence time and different Peclet numbers. Every one of them has its mean at exactly one, and they are nothing alike: the loosest lets a tenth of the tracer out before a third of the mean time has passed, and the tightest is nearly the spike a plug-flow calculation assumes. Fluids at work

The outlet is the inlet, a while ago

A bed has a mean residence time and everybody quotes it. Six beds with the same mean let their first hundredth through at 0.20 and at 0.85 of it, mix a window of inlet history between 1.53 and 0.18 wide, and convert a first-order reaction by amounts the mean cannot distinguish.

 Three instruments, three derivatives, one field. A density field — a shock, smoothed to its own thickness — and what each of the three optical techniques records across it, each scaled to its own peak so the shapes can be compared. Interferometry follows the density itself; schlieren follows its first derivative and peaks where the density is changing fastest; shadowgraph follows the second and is a light-and-dark pair straddling the same place. None of them is looking at the flow: the refractive index of a gas is linear in its density, so every one of them is a densitometer and the differences between them are differences of calculus rather than of apparatus. What is taught wrongly

An instrument that takes a derivative

Dye, smoke and seeded particles mark the fluid and read the marks. The optical ones mark nothing — light passes through and is bent — and what a plate records is not the flow but a derivative of its density. Two of the three are therefore exactly blind to a uniform stream, at any speed it happens to have.

 Three exponents for one dimensionless group. The local slope of each error, measured over one decade at a time. The duct's is exactly 1, the long wave's is exactly 2, and the slender body's drifts from 1.900 to 1.733 across the range and never reaches either. The same geometric ratio, in three problems that look alike, and the third one has no exponent at all. Regimes and numbers

One group, three exponents

Lubrication theory, shallow water and slender-body theory are taught in three places and are one expansion in one group — a ratio of two lengths, with no speed, no viscosity and no fluid in it at all. The error is supposed to be second order. In three problems that look alike it is first order, second order, and an exponent that does not exist.

 The only candidate the far field allows, and the wall it slips past. The general Stokes solution has four constants; the condition at infinity kills two of them and fixes a third, leaving one to satisfy two conditions at the wall. Setting the stream function to zero there uses it up, and the tangential velocity that remains is exactly twice the free stream — for every radius, every speed, and every fluid. Viscosity

The flow with no solution

Creeping flow past a sphere has a solution and everybody knows it. Creeping flow past a cylinder has none — not a difficult one, not one needing a clever method. The equations, the no-slip condition and the uniform stream at infinity are inconsistent, and the residual is exactly twice the free stream.

 The two dissipations, side by side. The strain form on the left and the enstrophy form on the right, for the same field, on the same scale. They have their maxima in different places — 0.46 apart on a box of side 2 pi — and neither is a smoothed version of the other. One says the dissipation is in the strained regions and the other says it is in the rotating ones, which is nearly a complete disagreement about what a turbulent flow is doing. Transition and turbulence

Equal on average, and nothing else

The rate at which a fluid turns motion into heat can be written two ways, and every textbook says the two are equivalent. Their averages are equal to fourteen decimal places. Point by point they are uncorrelated, and their maxima are in different places.

 The stretching a window of history did, drawn as a field. The largest finite-time Lyapunov exponent over eight units of time in the double gyre, darkest where two neighbouring parcels were pulled furthest apart. The bright crest is a curve across the domain, and it is a property of the eight units rather than of any instant inside them. Flows and fields

A boundary that only exists over a window

The curve that separates fluid going one way from fluid going another is not in any snapshot of the flow. It is the crest of a field built from a stretch of history, it moves when the stretch is changed, and reversing the direction of time gives a different curve entirely — both of them real.

 The temperature behind a shock, which is not the jump condition's. The static temperature along the flow behind a Mach 6 normal shock, with the frozen value the jump conditions give and the equilibrium value they give a long way behind. The gas arrives at 2382 K and settles at 2059, over about four tenths of a millimetre. Compressible flow

A gas that has not finished being shocked

The jump conditions give the state a long way behind a shock. Immediately behind it the molecules have not started vibrating yet, so the temperature is 2,382 K where the equilibrium answer is 2,059 — and the gas takes four tenths of a millimetre to get from one to the other.

 A threshold that is a curve, not a pressure. The tension a rectangular pulse has to reach to make a five-micron bubble run away, against how long the pulse lasts. At a tenth of a microsecond it takes forty bar; at a hundred microseconds it takes 1.05, which is within about one per cent of the static threshold. There is no such thing as the cavitation pressure of this bubble on its own. Fluids at work

A threshold that is also a duration

The cavitation number treats inception as a pressure: below it the liquid tears, above it does not. A five-micron bubble asked to grow in 0.3 microseconds needs 43 bar of tension and the same bubble given a hundred needs 1.05, because it has to make a journey and not merely respond.

All themes