Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Theme

The thread: One number decides the regime — page 26

Page 26 of 34, continuing through the 305 essays this motif runs through.

305 essays carry this thread — page 26 of 34.

The line the dye actually draws. A streakline in an oscillating uniform stream: everything released from the origin over the last 3.4 units of time, drawn where it has got to at one instant. The parameter along it is release time, not distance and not time of flight, which is why it is a record rather than a curve of the field. The mean speed of 1 exceeds the amplitude of 0.6, so the fluid never reverses and the filament is single-valued in x. Flows and fields

The line the dye actually draws

The streakline is the curve most photographs really show, and of the three curves it is the hardest to compute, because it needs the whole history of the flow. This draws it, in a flow where all four curves have closed forms, and the third curve turns out to be a different kind of object from the other two rather than a third example of the same one.

 The eighths nobody chose. Four physical statements — the inner layer sits in the classical one's shear, its inertia balances its own viscous stress, the pressure is of the order of that inertia, and the displacement it makes produces that pressure — are a linear system in four exponents. Solving it gives three eighths, five eighths, one eighth and a quarter, exactly. Ideal flow

The length the limit invents

Prandtl's equations are parabolic, so nothing at one station can depend on anything downstream of it. Every experiment shows the pressure rising ahead of a shock or a step. The resolution is a region three eighths of a power of the Reynolds number long, which the limit that produced the equations was supposed to have removed.

 The same data, in a basis the theorem allows just as much. The identical two hundred and forty points, plotted as F/(mu U d) — which is the drag coefficient times the Reynolds number, a perfectly legitimate pi group forming a complete pair with the abscissa. The result is a straight line of slope 0.9985 through five decades with an r-squared of 0.9985, and it contains no physics: the ordinate contains the abscissa. Regimes and numbers

The groups are not the only groups

Buckingham's theorem fixes how many dimensionless groups an answer can depend on and says nothing about which. Two of the infinitely many legitimate choices are used here on the same data: one manufactures a straight line through five decades out of a constant, and the other erases Stokes' law completely.

 Four fluids under the same stress, and the four profiles that result. Each fluid carries the same linear stress and answers it differently: a Newtonian fluid with a parabola, a shear-thinning one with a blunter profile, a shear-thickening one with a sharper one, and a Bingham plastic with a plug in the middle where the stress is below its yield point. Viscosity

The stress a pipe knows

A capillary viscometer measures a pressure drop and a flow rate and reports a viscosity. The first half of that inference is a force balance and is exact for any fluid there is; the second needs the slope of a whole flow curve, which is the experiment the instrument was bought to avoid.

 The stress a closure predicts, and the stress there is. The Reynolds-stress anisotropy through a step change in the strain rate, against what an eddy viscosity gives — which is the equilibrium value at every instant. The real stress takes about a turnover to get there, and during that turnover the closure is wrong by up to sixty per cent. Transition and turbulence

A closure with no memory at all

An eddy viscosity says the Reynolds stress is the mean strain rate times a number, now. The stress it is standing in for takes a turnover to arrive, so the closure is the zero-frequency limit of a response that has a lag in it — and the curve it is the limit of is the same shape as an aerofoil's lift deficiency.

 The one curve of the four that measures a gradient. A row of particles released along a line at one instant, seen at 4 later times, in a layer profile. Each line has been displaced by the local velocity times the elapsed time and by nothing else, so dividing the displacement back out returns the profile exactly — checked here to machine precision at every one of two hundred heights. A streamline, a pathline and a streakline each report where fluid went; this one reports how fast neighbouring fluid was going relative to its neighbour, which is the quantity a boundary layer is made of and the one the other three never show. Flows and fields

The curve that measures a gradient

Three of the four curves drawn through a flow answer the same question — where did the fluid go. The fourth answers a different one. A line of particles released together is displaced by the local velocity and by nothing else, so its shape is the velocity profile, and dividing the elapsed time back out returns that profile exactly rather than approximately.

 A skin lags the air by a time its own thickness sets. A skin held at one flight condition, relaxing towards the adiabatic wall temperature. The approach is exponential with a time constant ρc τ / h — 8.37 s at 2 mm, 25.1 s at 6 mm, 50.2 s at 12 mm — so the temperature a steady recovery calculation gives is reached after several minutes rather than at once. The fluid supplies one number to this calculation, the adiabatic wall temperature, and the structure supplies everything else. Compressible flow

The skin that lags the flight

A wall can be told its temperature or told nothing, and both are solved problems. A real skin is told neither. It has heat capacity, so its temperature is a transient whose time constant is its own thickness divided by what the layer delivers — and the number the steady calculation returns is an upper bound a short exposure never collects.

 How flat the optimum is. The same curve near its maximum, with the bands within a tenth and a half of one per cent of the best shaded. Every taper ratio from 0.31 to 0.42 is within a tenth of a per cent of the optimum, and the whole band from 0.25 to 0.51 is within half a per cent. The optimum is exact, and choosing it rather than its neighbour buys nothing a wing can measure. Circulation and lift

The optimum that does not matter

Elliptic loading gives the least induced drag, exactly, and the proof is one line: the penalty is a sum of squares. Which is also why the optimum is flat enough that a quarter of the design space sits inside a tenth of a per cent of it.

 A particle released in still fluid, with the history and without. The velocity of a hundred-micron particle released at one metre a second in air, computed with the unsteady Stokes force and with the quasi-steady drag alone. After five particle time constants the one that remembers is still moving nearly four times as fast. Viscosity

The drag that integrates a whole history

A particle released in still air does not stop exponentially. The unsteady drag on it carries a term that is an integral over everything the particle has already done, weighted by the inverse square root of how long ago — so there is no time constant, and five particle time constants later it is still moving four times faster than the quasi-steady answer allows.

All themes