Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Theme

The thread: One number decides the regime — page 8

Page 8 of 34, continuing through the 305 essays this motif runs through.

305 essays carry this thread — page 8 of 34.

α = 13.0: a plug in the middle and everything happening at the wall. The velocity profile at eight phases of one cycle, at a Womersley number of 13.0 — the human aorta's at rest. The core moves almost as a solid plug, because viscosity cannot reach it within a cycle; all the shear is in a layer of thickness √(ν/ω) = 0.77 mm against a radius of 10.0 mm. At some phases the fluid near the wall is moving backwards while the core still moves forward, which is the reversal a Poiseuille profile can never show and which is routinely measured in arteries. Regimes and numbers

Too fast for a profile

A pipe carrying a steady flow has a parabolic profile. Make the pressure oscillate and one number decides whether it still does — and above about ten the core moves as a plug, a quarter of a cycle behind the pressure, with the fastest fluid in a ring near the wall rather than on the axis.

 The same 10° turn, taken both ways. A supersonic stream turned away from itself expands through a fan of Mach waves and keeps every bit of its total pressure. Turned into itself through the same angle it shocks, and pays. Nothing in the equations distinguishes the two cases except the sign of the angle: compression waves converge and steepen into a front, expansion waves diverge and spread. Compressible flow

Turning the other way is free

Compression through ten degrees at Mach 2 costs 1.54 per cent of the total pressure. Expansion through the same ten degrees costs exactly nothing — not approximately nothing, nothing — and the two are the same equations with the sign of one angle changed.

 One layer, and the four others inside and outside it. The velocity profile over a flat plate, and the temperature profile in the same layer at four Prandtl numbers: a liquid metal at 0.01, air at 0.71, water at 7 and a heavy oil at 100. The equations differ by one number and the profiles differ by a factor of twenty in thickness. At Pr = 1 the two are the same function — not similar, identical, to eight decimal places — because the equations and the conditions are then the same, which is what every statement called a Reynolds analogy rests on. Regimes and numbers

The other layer, and the one number that separates them

A wall in a stream carries two boundary conditions and grows two layers. Their thicknesses differ by a factor of twenty across ordinary fluids, and at exactly one Prandtl number the two profiles are not similar but identical.

 The stretch of surface that is boiling. The pressure coefficient along both surfaces of a section at 4 degrees, computed from the same potential-flow solution as the other ideal-flow aerofoil figures. The horizontal line is the vapour pressure at a cavitation number of 1: wherever the suction curve is above it, the liquid there has been pulled below its vapour pressure and is boiling at whatever temperature it happens to be. This section cavitates at any σ below 1.428. Fluids at work

When a body tears the water

A propeller blade moving fast enough pulls the pressure at its own surface below the vapour pressure of the liquid, and the water boils at whatever temperature it happens to be. Where that happens is decided by an inviscid calculation of the pressure along the blade.

 Stable in every mode, and 100 times larger first. The energy of the worst-case disturbance against time, on a logarithmic scale, at four Reynolds numbers and at the one the slider selects. Time is in units of Re, which is what makes the four curves the same shape; what changes with Reynolds number is the height, and it changes as the square. Every eigenvalue of this operator is negative throughout, so nothing that grows here is an instability in the sense a stability analysis reports. Transition and turbulence

Every mode decays and it grows anyway

A stability analysis asks whether any mode of a flow grows, and for pipe flow the answer is no, at every Reynolds number, which the pipe disagrees with. The missing ingredient is that the modes are not perpendicular — a disturbance made of two nearly parallel decaying pieces can grow by a factor of Re²/16 before it dies.

 The correction belongs to the wing, not to the air. Lift-curve slope against Mach number for three aspect ratios, each computed by solving the lifting line for the wing the transformation actually implies — one of aspect ratio βAR — and dividing by β. The dashed curve is the two-dimensional rule, which is what an aerofoil section gets. At Mach 0.7 the aspect ratio of 20 has gained 35 per cent of slope and the aspect ratio of 4 has gained 24, against the 40 per cent the section rule promises both. The β in the finite-wing term cancels the β in front of it, so the shorter the wing the less compressibility does to it. Regimes and numbers

The wing the equation is really solving

The Prandtl–Glauert rule is usually quoted as a factor on the answer. It is a change of shape — and in three dimensions the shape it changes is the aspect ratio, so a short wing is far less affected by compressibility than a long one.

 80 per cent of the energy goes to the larger scale. One unit of energy is taken out of the middle wavenumber and shared between its two neighbours. Two conservation laws decide the split completely: the energy must add up, and so must the enstrophy, which weights each wavenumber by k². For (1, 2, 4) the answer is that 80.0 per cent of the energy goes up in scale and 80.0 per cent of the enstrophy goes down. There is no model of turbulence anywhere in that: it is two linear equations in two unknowns, and it is why a two-dimensional flow organises itself into large vortices while its gradients get finer. Transition and turbulence

The cascade that runs backwards

Three-dimensional turbulence carries energy from large scales to small ones and dissipates it. Take away one dimension and the term that does it vanishes identically, a second quantity becomes conserved, and two conservation laws between them force the energy to go the other way — up in scale, into ever larger vortices.

 Two different physics, one destination. The Fanno and Rayleigh lines, each with temperature up the page and entropy across, each referred to its own sonic state. Neither is a curve anybody drew: the entropy was swept over Mach number and its maximum located, and it sits at Mach 1 on both to within the resolution of the sweep. The subsonic branch runs up to the nose from the left and the supersonic branch runs up from below, so whatever is being done to the flow, it can only be moved towards that point. Compressible flow

Two ways to choke

Friction and heat are different physics acting on different conservation laws, and they drive a duct's flow to exactly the same place. Both have their entropy maximum at Mach 1, so neither can push a subsonic flow past it and both drag a supersonic one down to it — and where their two curves cross is a shock.

 Where the number says, and where it happens. Fourteen dimensionless groups on one logarithmic axis. The open circle on each row is the value at which the two terms the group compares are equal, which is one by the way the group is formed; the filled mark is the value at which the thing a reader cares about first changes by 1%. The bar between them is the distance the folklore phrase "of order one" hides, and it runs from nothing at all to a factor of 594. Regimes and numbers

What "of order one" is worth

A dimensionless group is built by comparing two terms, so it is one when the terms are equal — and that is the only thing it says. Where the behaviour actually changes is a separate question with a separate answer, and across fourteen groups on this site the two numbers differ by factors from one to five hundred and ninety-four.

All themes