Theme

The thread: Taught wrongly, everywhere — page 11

Page 11 of 14, continuing through the 124 essays this motif runs through.

124 essays carry this thread — page 11 of 14.

The coefficient Stokes threw away is not a correction. What absorbs sound in dry air, split into the three transport effects that add to make the diffusivity of sound. Shear viscosity is the largest single contribution and it is not most of it; the bulk viscosity — which Stokes set to zero in 1845, saying in the same paper that he had no argument for doing so — is a quarter, and thermal conduction is a fifth. Setting ζ to zero does not make a small error in the absorption; it makes a 24 per cent one.

The viscosity nobody uses

A fluid has two viscosities. One resists a change of shape and appears in every figure on this site; the other resists a change of volume, was set to zero by Stokes in 1845 in a paper that says he had no argument for doing so, and for carbon dioxide is fifteen hundred times larger than the one everybody quotes.

The one term in ground effect that really is about carried air. The added mass of a plate approaching a plane, as a multiple of its free-air value. In free air a plate borrows ρπc²/4 per unit span — exactly 0.79 for a unit chord in unit density, which is the mass of the circle its chord spans. Near a wall the fluid in the gap must leave sideways through a narrowing passage, so it moves faster than it would in the open and carries more energy: the borrowed mass grows as the inverse of the gap and diverges as the gap closes. At half a chord it is 1.21 times, at a tenth 2.06, at a twentieth 3.12. This is a cushion in the ordinary sense — fluid that has to be got out of the way and resists being — and it is the term the steady argument has none of.

What is taught wrongly

The cushion that is there after all

A wing near the ground makes more lift for reasons that have no cushion in them, and that account cannot reach two cases — a wing descending, and a rotor in the hover, where there is no steady flight for the image-vortex account to be about. Those cases have a term that really is about carried air, and it grows without limit as the gap closes.

Stokes' drag stops being the answer almost at once. The damping on a millimetre sphere oscillating in air, divided by Stokes' steady drag on the same sphere, against frequency. The extra term is the sphere's radius over the layer thickness, so it takes over as soon as the layer is thinner than the body — which for a millimetre sphere in air is below one hertz. At a kilohertz the damping is fifteen times the steady value, and the exponent is a half rather than zero.

Viscosity

What a fluid takes out of a swing

The damping a body feels from the air around it is not Stokes' drag, and stops being it far earlier than anybody expects — a millimetre sphere in air is already forty-six per cent above the steady answer at one hertz. Past that the damping rises as the square root of the frequency, and the fluid it is fighting is a shell a fraction of its own size.

Transition and turbulence

Sufficient, and not necessary

A stratified shear layer whose Richardson number exceeds a quarter everywhere cannot go unstable. That is a theorem with an exact number in it. What it does not say — and what it is constantly read as saying — is that a layer below a quarter will.

$Three instruments, three derivatives, one field. A density field — a shock, smoothed to its own thickness — and what each of the three optical techniques records across it, each scaled to its own peak so the shapes can be compared. Interferometry follows the density itself; schlieren follows its first derivative and peaks where the density is changing fastest; shadowgraph follows the second and is a light-and-dark pair straddling the same place. None of them is looking at the flow: the refractive index of a gas is linear in its density, so every one of them is a densitometer and the differences between them are differences of calculus rather than of apparatus.$ What is taught wrongly

An instrument that takes a derivative

Dye, smoke and seeded particles mark the fluid and read the marks. The optical ones mark nothing — light passes through and is bent — and what a plate records is not the flow but a derivative of its density. Two of the three are therefore exactly blind to a uniform stream, at any speed it happens to have.

The trailing-edge speed against circulation, for a sharp edge and a round one. Sampled one grid point off the trailing edge. The sharp edge is singular at every circulation but one: the speed there is about U at the Kutta value and 11.3U half a Kutta circulation away, and it grows without bound as the sample approaches the edge. The round edge has no such point. That is the whole of the Kutta condition's justification, and it needs the corner.

Circulation and lift

The condition that can be bought

Ideal flow round a closed body has one solution for every circulation, and the Kutta condition picks one. Its justification is entirely the sharp edge: every other circulation puts an infinite velocity there. Take the corner away and nothing chooses — which is not a curiosity, it is what a circulation-control aerofoil is.

$Spin against distance flown, not against time. The spin of a struck golf ball as a fraction of its launch spin, against how far it has flown. The integrated flight sits exactly on an exponential in distance, because the spin-down torque is proportional to speed times spin and the speed cancels. The constant is 1,202 metres and the drive is 200, so the ball arrives with five sixths of the spin it left with.$ Fluids at work

The ball that never forgets its spin

Commentary explains a late-swerving ball by saying the spin is dying away. The spin-down torque goes as speed times spin, so spin decays over a distance rather than a time — 1,202 metres for a golf ball against a 200-metre drive — and what dies away is the speed, which makes the swerve stronger.

100 metres of water, −1.98 MPa absolute at the top. The absolute pressure up a transpiring column 100 metres tall, with the sap rising at 0.25 mm/s through conduits 40 µm across. It starts at 1.3 kPa at the root, falls by 9.79 kPa a metre for gravity and 10.02 for friction, and reaches −1.98 MPa at the top — below zero, which is not a low push but a pull. The pale line is the same column with nothing flowing. The floor is not the vapour pressure but the pore a gas bubble could be drawn through: −2.81 MPa for a 50 nm pore, which this column would reach at 142 metres. A suction pump lifting the same water from a free surface stops at 10.1 metres, because it offers the water somewhere to boil.

What is taught wrongly

Where a liquid does pull

A fluid cannot pull, and the essays that settle what suction is are right about every gas and every liquid with a free surface near it. A liquid with nothing in it to boil on is another matter. Every tree taller than ten metres depends on the difference, and the floor under it is set by the size of a pore rather than by the vapour pressure.

Friction lends the crown 28.4 kPa, and the tank takes it back. The absolute pressure at the crown of a siphon with friction in its hose, through a whole drain, for the crown placed at three positions along the hose, against the frictionless constant of 23.01 kPa. With the crown 0.3 of the way it starts at 63.3 kPa, with the crown 0.5 along it starts at 51.5 kPa and with the crown 0.7 of the way it starts at 40.4 kPa. Every curve is above the constant, every curve falls towards it as the level falls, and every curve reaches it at the end — 23.06 kPa with a centimetre of level left. Friction never brings a siphon nearer to breaking; it lends a margin, and the draining tank returns it pascal by pascal, so the worst the crown ever sees is the frictionless value.

What is taught wrongly

The margin friction lends a siphon

Without friction a draining siphon's crown pressure does not depend on the source level at all, and every real hose has friction. It turns out always to raise the crown pressure, by an amount the draining tank hands back pascal by pascal — and how much it lends is decided by where along the hose the crown sits, not by how rough or how narrow the hose is.

All themes