Theme

The thread: Taught wrongly, everywhere — page 14

Page 14 of 14, continuing through the 124 essays this motif runs through.

124 essays carry this thread — page 14 of 14.

Five spectra, five exponents, one linear equation. The energy of a decaying turbulence after the nonlinear term has stopped mattering, computed by integrating the exact modal solution E(k,0)exp(−2 nu k² t) at five different shapes of the spectrum at the origin. Each is a straight line on these axes and no two have the same slope: the exponent is (m+1)/2, where k^m is the spectrum's behaviour at wavenumbers smaller than any eddy. The 5/2 that is quoted as the final period's universal exponent is the m = 4 line and one of five.

Universal, and one of five

A turbulence that has run its Reynolds number down stops being turbulent, the equations go linear, and the decay picks up a new exponent. That exponent is quoted everywhere as 5/2 and as universal. It is neither: it is the same corner of the same spectrum deciding the answer a second time.

$A pump slowed into a system with a static lift leaves its own specific speed. The specific speed of the operating point, as a share of its value at the best point, against the fraction of the design flow delivered, for a pump drawn for 0.1 m³/s against 40 m at 1450 rpm, specific speed 0.545 at its best point. Under speed control into a system whose static lift is 0 per cent, 30 per cent, 60 per cent, 90 per cent of the design head (lines), and under a throttle at design speed into the 60 per cent system (dashed). With no static lift the speed-controlled pump stays exactly at its best point and its specific speed never moves. At half the design flow it has fallen to 1.000, 0.800, 0.708, 0.652 of the design value as the static share rises, and to 0.598 under the throttle.$ Fluids at work

The specific speed a pump spends its life at

A pump is chosen by its specific speed at its best point and then run somewhere else. Written in the pump's own coefficients the number is √φ/ψ^¾, a position along its characteristic, and a variable-speed drive keeps it there only when the system it pumps into has no static lift. Every metre of lift moves a slowed pump along its own curve, towards shut-off, and a throttle moves it further.

Below Mach 1.153 the boom turns back before it reaches the ground. The ray leaving the Mach cone straight down from an aeroplane at 11 km, at Mach 1.1, 1.15, 1.2, 1.5, 2, traced through a standard atmosphere whose sound speed rises from 295.1 m/s at the aeroplane to 340.3 m/s at the ground. A ray bends back upward where the local sound speed equals the aeroplane's speed, so Mach 1.1: turns at 4.00 km; Mach 1.15: turns at 0.25 km; Mach 1.2: lands 24.0 km on; Mach 1.5: lands 11.4 km on; Mach 2: lands 7.1 km on. The dividing speed, Mach 1.1533, is the ratio of the two sound speeds.

Compressible flow

The boom that turns back before the ground

Sound is faster in the warm air near the ground, so a sonic boom's rays bend back upward on the way down. Whether any of them arrive is one comparison — the aeroplane's speed against the fastest sound beneath it — and the ray that just grazes the ground sets the edge of the carpet, which the uniform air of the ageing calculation cannot give it.

Four over the dimension, and three dimensions is where the three comes from. The constant in front of the exact law, against the number of dimensions the flow lives in. Both exact results — Yaglom's for a scalar and the velocity's law for the mixed third moment — have this same constant, because both come from the same statement: an isotropic radial flux in separation space whose divergence is a constant sink. Integrating that divergence gives 4Q r/d and nothing else. The four-thirds everybody quotes is four over three, and the three is the space rather than anything about turbulence. The dots are the quadrature, which agrees with the closed form to 2·10⁻⁹.

Transition and turbulence

The fraction that is really four thirds

Turbulence has two exact results, not one. The second is about a scalar carried by the flow, its constant is four thirds rather than four fifths, and the difference between the two fractions has nothing in it about turbulence at all — it is the price of writing a three-component object in terms of one component.

The arrival map, and the place where it goes backwards. Where each boom ray lands on the ground, against the Mach number the aeroplane was doing when it launched it, for four accelerations from 15 km. In level flight this would be a straight line rising at the aeroplane's own speed. Here it falls before it rises: a ray launched at a higher Mach number is shorter and steeper, and near the cut-off it shortens faster than the aeroplane advances. Every minimum in these curves is a fold — two emission times delivering to one place — and on the fold itself neighbouring rays converge onto a single line.

Compressible flow

The carpet an accelerating aeroplane folds

Level flight launches every boom ray with the same invariant, so they run parallel and each place hears one boom. Accelerate, and each successive ray is shorter than the last — shorter, near the cut-off, than the aeroplane's own advance — so later rays overtake earlier ones and the arrival map folds onto a line.

What is taught wrongly

The spot a local theory cannot see

Newtonian theory gives every panel of a hypersonic vehicle a pressure set by its own angle to the stream, and no panel more than the stagnation pressure behind a normal shock. Let a shock from one part cross the bow shock of another and a supersonic jet forms that reaches the surface through weaker shocks. At Mach 8 it stagnates at 8.6 times the ceiling — and the worst amplification at every Mach number is close to the Mach number itself.

The part of a field 4 cameras cannot see. Middle, a field with no symmetry on a 16 × 16 grid. Left, the part of it that projects to exactly nothing in every one of 4 views, shaded one way above zero and the other below: a pattern of streaks and hollows that cancels along every ray. Right, the field with that part taken away. The middle and right fields give identical pictures in all 4 views, to 2e-13 of the largest ray, and no reconstruction from those views can tell them apart. The invisible part is one combination of 177 independent patterns the views cannot see.

What is taught wrongly

Four cameras and a field they cannot see

An axisymmetric flow can be rebuilt from one photograph because its symmetry supplies every other view. A flow without an axis has to be photographed from several directions, and a few directions do not merely give a noisy answer — they leave whole patterns of density that every camera records as nothing. Four views of a 16 × 16 field see 79 of its 256 independent patterns and are exactly blind to the rest.

All themes