Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Theme

The thread: The exact theory is wrong — page 10

Page 10 of 22, continuing through the 193 essays this motif runs through.

193 essays carry this thread — page 10 of 22.

The hodograph plane, where the unknown boundary is the known one. The same flow drawn in the plane of its own velocity, ζ = (u − iv)/U. The plate, whose shape is known in the physical plane, becomes a segment of the imaginary axis; the axis of symmetry becomes a segment of the real one; and the free streamline — whose shape nobody knows — becomes an arc of the unit circle, because the speed on it is exactly the free stream. The unknown and the known have changed places, which is why the problem can be solved at all. Ideal flow

Where the unknown boundary is the known one

A free surface is the hardest kind of boundary — its shape is part of the answer, so the region the problem is posed in is not known until the problem is solved. Draw the same flow in the plane of its own velocity and the shape becomes an arc of a circle, known in advance and exactly.

 A curved shock, and the entropy each streamline picks up crossing it. A parabolic bow shock ahead of a blunt nose at Mach six, with the streamlines drawn arriving horizontally and a marker at each crossing whose size is the total pressure lost there. The streamline through the nose crosses a normal shock and keeps three per cent of its total pressure; one four nose radii out crosses at fourteen degrees and keeps ninety-four per cent. Every streamline gets a different entropy, and the stagnation enthalpy is the same on all of them. Compressible flow

The spin a shock leaves behind

A curved shock gives every streamline a different entropy rise and the same stagnation enthalpy. Crocco's theorem then forces vorticity into a flow with no viscosity anywhere — and it scales as the inverse of the shock's radius of curvature, exactly, so a straight shock makes none.

 Where four insects have to turn round. Wagner's function — the fraction of its eventual circulation a wing has built after a stated distance of travel — with the half-stroke of each of four insects marked on it. Every one of them reverses while the curve is still climbing, so no insect wing ever reaches the circulation a steady calculation assigns it. What is taught wrongly

A calculation with no memory in it

The bee calculation is famous for using the wrong velocity. Done with the right one it still falls short, and the reason is structural: a quasi-steady sum is a statement about a wing that has always been going, and an insect's wing travels between two and five chord lengths before it turns round.

 A pump curve out of the momentum theorem. The pressure an ejector delivers, against how much it is entraining, at a fixed nozzle. It has the shape of every pump characteristic ever measured — a shut-off pressure with no flow, falling to no pressure at free delivery — and it was obtained from a momentum balance on a tube with nothing in it. The shut-off value here is 36.0 kPa and the machine at its best power runs at 4.56 times its own motive flow. Fluids at work

Mixing is a pump

Two streams at different speeds mixing in a tube destroy energy — the same Borda–Carnot expression a handbook prints beside a sudden enlargement, with two streams in it instead of one. And while they destroy it the pressure rises, which makes the loss the mechanism of a machine with no moving parts.

 The momentum of the fluid, against the shape of the region it is added up over. Momentum of the fluid around a cylinder moving through it, divided by the body's hydrodynamic impulse, against the aspect ratio of the rectangle the integral was taken over. Every rectangle has the same area and contains the same body. A tall region gives minus the impulse, a long one gives plus it, a square gives exactly zero, and the limit of a large region is whichever of those the region was shaped like. The momentum of an unbounded ideal flow is not a number. Ideal flow

The momentum with no value

A cylinder is pushed from rest to a steady speed. Work was done, energy went into the fluid, something was pushed. How much momentum does the fluid carry? The integral converges, the answer is finite, and it is a different finite number for every shape of region it is summed over.

 The density ratio and the nose pressure coefficient, against Mach number. Two quantities across a normal shock, on a logarithmic Mach axis. Both approach limits that depend on γ and on nothing else: six for the density ratio and 1.8394 for the pressure coefficient at the stagnation point. By Mach five the second is within three per cent of its limit and by Mach twenty within a tenth of a per cent. Above that the flow round a blunt body has stopped depending on how fast it is going and started depending on what the gas is. Compressible flow

A shock that lies on the body

Above about Mach eight the flow round a blunt body stops depending on how fast it is going. The density ratio, the nose pressure coefficient and the shock standoff all reach limits set by γ alone — and going from a perfect gas to a dissociating one halves the standoff.

 Three thresholds, and none of them is one. The neutral curves for a layer heated from below, computed by taking the smallest eigenvalue of the marginal-stability operator at each horizontal wavenumber. Every curve diverges at both ends — a cell wider than the layer has to carry heat sideways for ever, a narrower one loses it to conduction — so each has a minimum, and that minimum is the critical Rayleigh number. Two free surfaces give 657.5, one rigid and one free 1100.7, two rigid walls 1707.8. Nothing but the boundary condition differs, and it carries a factor of 2.6. Transition and turbulence

The threshold the walls decide

A layer heated from below convects at a Rayleigh number of 1707.762, and nothing whatever happens at one. The free–free case has a closed form and the two that do not differ from it by a factor of 2.6 — produced by nothing but what the top and bottom surfaces are permitted to do.

 A cylinder in a uniform shear, K = 0.4. A stream whose velocity increases with height, meeting a circular cylinder. The oncoming profile is drawn at the left. The flow carries uniform vorticity −K, so it is a solution of Euler's equations and not of Laplace's, the pattern is no longer symmetric top to bottom, and the body feels a lift towards the fast side with no circulation anywhere. Ideal flow

Inviscid does not mean irrotational

Dropping viscosity gives Euler's equations. Assuming nothing is spinning gives Laplace's — one scalar, linear, unique. The second step is a separate hypothesis about the flow's history, and a flow that fails it is still an inviscid flow with exact solutions of its own.

 The coefficient of the equation's second derivative, along a chord. The bracket multiplying the streamwise second derivative in the transonic small-disturbance equation, along a chord at Mach 0.85. Where it is positive the equation is elliptic and the flow is subsonic; where it is negative the equation is hyperbolic and the flow is supersonic. Which it is at a given point depends on the perturbation velocity there, which is the thing being solved for. Forty-two per cent of this chord is hyperbolic, and no amount of inspecting the problem beforehand could have said so. Compressible flow

The equation that changes type inside its own answer

Near Mach one the coefficient of the streamwise second derivative depends on the perturbation velocity, which is what is being solved for. Two solutions of the linear equation no longer add — the leftover is three times the term the linear theory keeps — and the critical Mach number approaches one as the two-thirds power of thickness.

All themes