Theme

The thread: A smooth picture proves nothing — page 28

Page 28 of 31, continuing through the 272 essays this motif runs through.

272 essays carry this thread — page 28 of 31.

Posts slip as one over the root of their fraction. The slip length of a surface of posts, over the period of their square array, against the fraction of the surface that is solid, beside Philip's stripes along and across and the dilute limit in which each post is a lone disc dragged edgewise, (3/16)√(π/φ). At a hundredth solid the posts slip 2.87 periods against the stripes' 1.32; at a tenth 0.597 against 0.591, nearly equal; at a half 0.0663 against 0.11 along the stripes and 0.0552 across them. Flows and fields

A post holds liquid back by its radius, a stripe by its length

A surface of no-slip posts standing in a gas-filled texture lets liquid slip over it, and the slip length grows as one over the square root of the solid fraction, where a surface of stripes grows only as its logarithm. The reason is the oldest contrast in slow flow: a disc dragged through a viscous liquid has a drag proportional to its radius, which is Stokes' law, and a line has no finite drag at all, which is Stokes' paradox. But sparse posts beat stripes only while they are sparse.

Four views, four guesses at what they missed. The earlier essay's field — two puffs and an oblique streak — and its reconstructions from the same four views, each choosing the part of the field the views cannot see by a different assumption. With none it is set to zero: an error of 42.8 per cent. The smoothest field the views allow: 39.8. A non-negative field: 24.7. A sum of Gaussian puffs of one width: 37.6. The first three meet every one of the 96 rays; the dictionary's does not. What is taught wrongly

A prior the pictures can refute is the one worth having

A few views of a flow with no symmetry leave most of the field unseen, and a reconstruction has to fill that part in by assuming something. Three common assumptions were tried on the same field and the same views. Non-negativity saves three views of ten, and five on a field of puffs; smoothness saves one; a dictionary of known shapes saves none unless it is exactly right, and when it is nearly right it can be wrong by a factor of a hundred. The prior that helps most is also the one the data can catch being wrong.

Local transparency is the best tree only when the ends absorb. The root's reflection at the heart rate against the reflection at the tree's leaves, for the map tree, for the single exponent that is best at that leaf reflection, and for Murray's. With leaves that reflect nothing the map tree is the best of all, 0.035 against 0.0419: making every junction transparent is then the whole job. As the leaves start to reflect, the best single exponent pulls ahead, because it leaves its junctions slightly mismatched in the way that cancels the echo coming back from the ends; at a leaf reflection of 0.5 it reflects 0.0735 to the map tree's 0.13. Regimes and numbers

A tree transparent at every junction is not the quietest

The branching rule that lets a heart's pulse through one junction without reflection is set by that junction's Womersley number: area-preserving in the aorta, Murray's in the small arteries. Build a whole arterial tree that way, every junction at its own transparent rule, and it reflects more of the pulse than the best tree built to a single exponent. The single exponent wins by leaving its junctions slightly mismatched, in the way that cancels the echo from the tree's own ends — the trick an antireflection coating plays on light.

Air that comes out fast makes the first pulse taller. The head at the closed valve of a 600 m main, in Joukowsky rises above its steady head, for eight round trips after the valve shuts, with the water saturated with air at atmospheric pressure. With no release the cavity is vapour and the first pulse is 1.3 rises. If all the water gives up its air slowly, over ten round trips, the gas cushions the collapse and the pulse is 1.16. If it comes out fast, in three-hundredths of one, the cavity holds the head near atmospheric pressure rather than the vapour pressure, it lasts a round trip longer, and the pulse is 1.46 — the air-cavity limit's 1.45. Fluids at work

The air a cavity releases is capped by the cavity

When a shut valve pulls the pressure behind it down, the air dissolved in the water starts to come out, and a little gas was already known to soften the hammer. But air leaves the water only while its pressure in the cavity is below the pressure the water was saturated at, so a cavity can fill with at most its own volume of air at that pressure — a seven-thousandth of the pipe here, however much water gives up its air and however fast. That is less than a third of what removes the hammer. Released quickly, the air does not cushion the collapse at all: it turns the vapour cavity into an air cavity, and the pulse becomes the column-separation pulse with the margin measured to the atmosphere — taller, on this main.

A laminar boundary layer eats through the sheath a Reynolds number of diameters back. How far out the boundary layer has eaten into the entropy layer, as the upstream radius of the streamline at its edge in nose diameters, against distance behind the nose, at Mach 15 for Reynolds numbers on the diameter of 10⁴ to 10⁷, laminar, and 10⁶ turbulent. The sheath's edge is the streamline whose entropy is half the axis's, 1.22 diameters out. The laminar layer reaches it at 3.3·10³ diameters for the smallest Reynolds number and 3.4·10⁶ for the largest; turbulent at 10⁶, at 536. Compressible flow

The sheath outlasts the body

A blunt hypersonic body wraps itself in a sheath of hot, thin gas from its nose's shock, and its boundary layer grows by eating that gas from the inside. The usual picture has the boundary layer through the sheath within a few nose diameters. It is not: a laminar boundary layer takes about a third of a Reynolds number of diameters to swallow the sheath at Mach 15, which is thousands to millions of diameters, and a turbulent one hundreds. On any body of ordinary length the boundary layer never sees the cooler gas outside, and it is heated by the sheath's gas all the way down.

A thin interface stays unstable far past a quarter. The fastest growth rate of any disturbance against the bulk Richardson number J, on a logarithmic scale, for a density interface as thick as the shear and two, two and a half and three times thinner. The matched layer's billow dies at a quarter, as Miles' theorem requires. Two times thinner, the billow dies sooner, its last growth at J = 0.12, and nothing replaces it. Three times thinner, the billow's last is at 0.08 and a travelling wave takes over: 0.0335 at a quarter, 0.0109 at one and 0.00629 at 1.3, falling steadily with no threshold in the range solved. At 2.5 the waves are weaker and reach 0.001 at 1.3. Transition and turbulence

A thin interface keeps its waves past a quarter

Miles' quarter rules a shear layer whose density changes over the same depth as its velocity. Make the density interface three times thinner and the stationary billow dies early, but a pair of travelling waves takes its place and is still growing at five times the quarter. No theorem is broken: at the edges of the shear, where the waves draw their energy, the local Richardson number has fallen to nothing.

Below a quarter the cloud settles on the cell walls; above it, it crosses them. Paths of particles released with the air's velocity inside one cell of the vortex lattice, at Stokes numbers of 0.15 and 0.4, over 25 time units; the cell's walls, the separatrices joining the saddles, are drawn. At 0.15 the particles are flung outwards by the rotation and approach the walls ever more closely without crossing, so the cloud is compressed onto lines. At 0.4 they reach a wall with enough speed to overshoot it into the next cell, where they meet particles coming the other way: the cloud folds. Flows and fields

A lattice of vortices folds a cloud at the saddles' quarter

A cloud of heavy particles folds in still air above a Stokes number of one, and in converging air above a quarter. Air that turns as well as converges might have settled between them. In a lattice of vortices it settles exactly on the quarter: the vortices fling the particles to the cell walls, but only the saddles where the walls meet can make them cross. Below the quarter nothing folds, and the cloud is gathered onto the walls without limit instead.

A wake throws a following cylinder out to the side, and the pair still meets. One cylinder's centre relative to the other's, the stream from left to right, for pairs released six radii apart at 2°, 5°, 10° and 20° from tandem at Re = 200. Without wakes (faint) the near-tandem pairs drift apart, out to 13 radii, before the drag lets the turn bring them in. With wakes the follower first drafts in, is thrown sideways out of the leader's wake, and never gets beyond 6.26 radii. Every pair touches, near side by side. Ideal flow

A trailing wake hurries a pair together

Two cylinders free in a stream and damped by their drag always end up meeting near side by side, and the obvious candidate for what holds real pairs apart is their wakes: a body beside another's wake is pushed towards the faster fluid, away from it. Give each cylinder a wake that carries its drag and the push is there — but it points the wrong way. It throws a following cylinder out of the leader's wake and round towards side by side, where neither is in the other's wake and nothing opposes the stream's pull. Near tandem the wakes make the pair meet seven to sixty times sooner, and the only balance they create is a saddle.

Elasticity adds a spring at first order and a slip only at second. The damping's deficit, one minus the damping ratio, and the in-phase force against Λ on logarithmic axes. The in-phase force rises in proportion to Λ — a fitted slope of 1.0000 — and the damping's deficit as its square, 2.0000. A slip length changes the damping at first order and adds no spring at all, so a soft wall and a slipping one are distinct in kind: the soft wall announces itself first in the phase of the force. What is taught wrongly

A soft wall is read as slip only at second order

A drainage force smaller than Taylor's has been read as the liquid slipping at the wall. A wall that gives under the drainage pressure lowers the force too, and it can be mistaken for slip. Solved together, the flow and the elastic wall say how: the softness first adds a spring to the force, in phase with the motion, and only at second order takes anything from the damping a slip length is read from. When it does, the slip it imitates grows as the square of the frequency and falls as the square of the gap.

All themes