Camber — where it appears
Named by 8 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The lift curve, and why it is a straight line
Lift against angle of attack is a straight line, it does not pass through the origin, and its slope is very close to a number that has no business being there. All three facts fall out of the theory.
From a circle to a wing
The flow past a circular cylinder is known exactly and is of no interest to anybody who wants to fly. A change of variable turns that circle into a wing section — and, because the change of variable preserves angles, it carries the whole solution across with it. Nothing is solved twice.
What a flap does, and what it does not
Lowering a flap gives a wing lift at an incidence where it had none. It does not make the wing more responsive to being pitched — the lift curve moves sideways and its slope does not change, and those are two quite different things to buy.
Where lift starts
A wing at zero incidence is not a wing making no lift. The angle at which a section stops lifting is a property of its camber line and of nothing else — not of its thickness, not of its speed, not of the air — and it is an integral anybody can take.
A right total from a wrong picture
Newtonian impact theory has a free constant in it. Tuned at five degrees it reproduces a NACA 2412's lift exactly, and no measurement at five degrees can tell it from the truth. What separates them is the derivative — a lift-curve slope 2.8 times too steep — which is a second constraint rather than a better one.
The wing that is flat, and flies
Refuting the equal-transit story by computing the parcels leaves its premise standing, and the premise is the part most readers believe: that the shape is what makes the lift. It is a claim about shapes, so it is tested with shapes — a flat plate, a symmetric section, and a cambered one flown upside down.
The half that carries nothing
Thin-aerofoil theory splits a section into a camber line that carries all the lift and a thickness distribution that carries none — at any incidence, exactly none. That is very nearly true, and what it discards decides the peak suction, the critical Mach number and where the boundary layer gives up.
Three numbers out of a camber line
Thin-aerofoil theory takes a whole function and returns a lift and a moment. Only three coefficients of that function survive: two camber lines matched in the first three, and eight tenths of a per cent of chord apart, have the same lift and the same moment at every incidence and load distributions thirty-seven per cent apart.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Thin-aerofoil theoryLift coefficientCirculationLift curve slopeKutta conditionPressure distributionConformal mapConstraintMeasurementAerodynamic centreJoukowskiMisconception