Conformal map — where it appears
Named by 19 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
From a circle to a wing
The flow past a circular cylinder is known exactly and is of no interest to anybody who wants to fly. A change of variable turns that circle into a wing section — and, because the change of variable preserves angles, it carries the whole solution across with it. Nothing is solved twice.
Not half a venturi
The air above a wing really is squeezed into a narrower channel, it really does speed up, and the pressure really does fall. Every step of the story is true and the whole is still not an explanation, because the channel's upper wall is a streamline — and where a streamline went is part of the answer, not part of the question.
When a body tears the water
A propeller blade moving fast enough pulls the pressure at its own surface below the vapour pressure of the liquid, and the water boils at whatever temperature it happens to be. Where that happens is decided by an inviscid calculation of the pressure along the blade.
Ask for the pressure, and see what shape that is
A designer knows what the pressure distribution has to do long before knowing what shape does it. Running the problem that way round is possible, it is exact, and it refuses more asks than it grants.
Where lift starts
A wing at zero incidence is not a wing making no lift. The angle at which a section stops lifting is a property of its camber line and of nothing else — not of its thickness, not of its speed, not of the air — and it is an integral anybody can take.
Nothing but the edge
Cut an aerofoil into panels, put a singularity on each, and require the surface to be a wall. The system that comes out has one more unknown than it has equations, and the row that is missing is not a bookkeeping slip — it is the fact that ideal flow round a closed body has no unique answer at all.
The hole that halves the flow
A jet leaving a sharp-edged hole is narrower than the hole, and by an amount that is not measured but computed. One geometry gives exactly one half from momentum alone; another gives exactly π/(π+2) from a conformal map in which the shape of the free surface is part of the answer.
Where the unknown boundary is the known one
A free surface is the hardest kind of boundary — its shape is part of the answer, so the region the problem is posed in is not known until the problem is solved. Draw the same flow in the plane of its own velocity and the shape becomes an arc of a circle, known in advance and exactly.
The half that carries nothing
Thin-aerofoil theory splits a section into a camber line that carries all the lift and a thickness distribution that carries none — at any incidence, exactly none. That is very nearly true, and what it discards decides the peak suction, the critical Mach number and where the boundary layer gives up.
The condition that can be bought
Ideal flow round a closed body has one solution for every circulation, and the Kutta condition picks one. Its justification is entirely the sharp edge: every other circulation puts an infinite velocity there. Take the corner away and nothing chooses — which is not a curiosity, it is what a circulation-control aerofoil is.
The part of the flow inside the body
A potential flow outside a body is an analytic function, and an analytic function does not stop at the boundary it was defined on. It continues inward until it meets a singularity — and every body in this collection has at least one inside it, in a place that decides how the flow behaves outside.
The corners that can be done with mirrors
The method of images works for a wall and for a circle, and for a corner it works only when the angle is pi over a whole number. At every other angle the reflections never come back, the image set is infinite and dense, and the flow exists anyway — which says the method is a statement about symmetry rather than about fluids.
One formula, and it does not ask what the shape is
Kutta–Joukowski gives the lift of any two-dimensional body from one number. Six bodies with nothing else in common are put at that number here and come out with identical lifts — and with pitching moments, load distributions and suction peaks that are not even close.
The mass a body has to borrow
Accelerate a sphere through water and it resists as though it were half again as heavy. The half is exact, it is a rational number rather than a measurement, and almost everything a reader infers from it about carried fluid is false.
The inside a flow does not decide
Every body in potential flow is built out of singularities that are not there. The exterior flow does not merely fail to determine them — it leaves an infinite family, whose members produce the identical field to the last bit outside and are nothing alike inside, and whose coefficients span five orders of magnitude for one unit free stream.
A stalled plate keeps a quarter of its lift slope and moves its centre aft
Kirchhoff's free streamlines gave a plate held across a stream a drag with no viscosity in it. Tilt the plate, let the flow leave both its edges, and the same construction is a wing that has stalled from its leading edge. Rayleigh solved it in 1876, and the hodograph confirms him to seven figures: near zero incidence the stalled plate lifts at a quarter of the attached plate's rate, its centre of pressure sits at five sixteenths of the chord instead of a quarter, and its force is normal to it, so its lift-to-drag ratio is the cotangent of its incidence. A real stalled wing lifts more, by a factor the wake's pressure decides.
Thickness carries no load of its own and still moves the load forward
Thin-aerofoil theory builds a section's pressures from three pieces computed apart — its thickness, its camber, its incidence — and adds them. Every piece can be computed exactly on a Joukowski section, and so can the section they add up to. Added, the parts give a suction peak a quarter too weak and a loading that sits too far aft, and they miss nine per cent of the lift: thickness, which lifts nothing by itself, multiplies what camber and incidence make by 1 + 0.77 t/c. Carry the summed velocities through Bernoulli instead of adding the pressures, and most of the error goes; the part that stays is the cross term between thickness and lift, and it is first order in the lift.
A step's face is pushed at its foot and pulled at its lip, equally
Ideal flow running up a step has two corners in it, and the local theory of corners says what each does: the inside corner at the foot brings the flow to rest, the outside corner at the lip sends it round at infinite speed. Solved exactly, the step's face feels both — a push of 2/π of a dynamic pressure times its height spread over its lower four-fifths, and a pull concentrated at the lip — and they cancel exactly, at every ramp angle, because one reflection of the mapping exchanges the two corners. A step has no drag in ideal flow for the same reason a flat plate's lift has no drag: a finite force carried by an infinite speed.
A block's front face is pulled upstream by its own lip
A forward-facing step's face is pushed at its foot and pulled at its lip by exactly equal amounts. Give the step a back — make it a block on the floor — and the balance goes. The two lips, a short top apart, each sit in the other's fast flow, and the suction at the front lip grows while the push at the foot hardly changes: a block as long as it is tall has its front face pulled upstream by three tenths of the dynamic pressure times its height, a block a quarter as long by two thirds. The back is pulled downstream by exactly as much, so the ideal block still has no drag; but every force that ideal flow assigns is now on the wrong face for separation to undo.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Model limitPotential flowBoundary conditionJoukowskiKutta conditionPressure coefficientSuperpositionThin-aerofoil theoryCirculationSeparationCamberd'Alembert's paradox