Dimensionless — where it appears
Named by 60 essays across 7 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
One number decides which physics applies
A bacterium and a whale both swim, and they are not doing the same thing at different sizes. The ratio of inertia to viscosity separates them, and crossing it changes the rules rather than the magnitudes.
A big slow push
The same thrust can be had from a lot of air moved a little or a little air moved a lot, and the two are not equivalent. One number decides which, it contains no engine, and it is why every airliner built since 1970 has a fan far larger than the machine driving it.
Counting what matters
Five quantities decide the drag on a sphere, and the experiment that measures it has one curve in it rather than a five-dimensional table. The reason is a rank: the matrix of dimensions has three independent rows, and what is left over is the number of dimensionless groups the answer can possibly depend on.
The number that does not depend on the tunnel
A pressure measured in a wind tunnel is a fact about that tunnel on that day. Divide it by the dynamic pressure and it becomes a fact about the shape — the same at any speed, in any fluid, at any scale, and equal to exactly one where the flow comes to rest.
Whether the droplet turns
The air goes round the wing. Whether what is carried in it goes round too is decided by one number — and below a critical value of that number the body collects nothing at all, however many droplets are thrown at it, because the flow turns every one of them in time.
Faster than the wind that drives it
An ice yacht in a fifteen-knot breeze does forty. That is not a trick and it does not need a special sail — it follows from two drag angles and a triangle, and the best speed a boat can reach is one over the sine of their sum.
Where a jet stops being a jet
A tap makes drops a few centimetres down, a garden hose makes a stream that carries, a sprayer makes a mist and a diesel injector makes fog. Same liquid, same mechanism, four regimes — and the number that separates them is not the jet's inertia but the surrounding air's.
The fastest way is not the straight one
A boat racing to a mark dead upwind sails seventy per cent further than the distance to it, and arrives first. The best angle is forty-five degrees plus half the apparent wind angle, it comes out of one line of trigonometry, and the same argument says to gybe downwind rather than run.
Two slow things make a fast one
Shear stretches a slug of dye and mixes nothing, because it is reversible. Molecular diffusion is hopeless at any scale bigger than a hair. Put the two together in a pipe and the dye spreads along it with an effective diffusivity two million times the molecular one — which gets larger as the molecular one gets smaller.
The radius that costs least
A vessel that carries a flow costs two things to own — the power to push fluid along it and the price of the tissue itself. Minimising the sum gives a best radius, the best radius makes flow proportional to radius cubed, and the rule that follows is a statement about a photograph that came out of a cost function.
Too fast for a profile
A pipe carrying a steady flow has a parabolic profile. Make the pressure oscillate and one number decides whether it still does — and above about ten the core moves as a plug, a quarter of a cycle behind the pressure, with the fastest fluid in a ring near the wall rather than on the axis.
The other layer, and the one number that separates them
A wall in a stream carries two boundary conditions and grows two layers. Their thicknesses differ by a factor of twenty across ordinary fluids, and at exactly one Prandtl number the two profiles are not similar but identical.
When a body tears the water
A propeller blade moving fast enough pulls the pressure at its own surface below the vapour pressure of the liquid, and the water boils at whatever temperature it happens to be. Where that happens is decided by an inviscid calculation of the pressure along the blade.
The cascade that runs backwards
Three-dimensional turbulence carries energy from large scales to small ones and dissipates it. Take away one dimension and the term that does it vanishes identically, a second quantity becomes conserved, and two conservation laws between them force the energy to go the other way — up in scale, into ever larger vortices.
What "of order one" is worth
A dimensionless group is built by comparing two terms, so it is one when the terms are equal — and that is the only thing it says. Where the behaviour actually changes is a separate question with a separate answer, and across fourteen groups on this site the two numbers differ by factors from one to five hundred and ninety-four.
Work out of a change of swirl
The work a rotor does per unit mass is the blade speed times the change in swirl, and that is all of it — no blade shape, no pressure, no efficiency, no gas properties. It is the same equation for a pump, a compressor, a turbine and a fan, and it follows from angular momentum on a box with nothing assumed about the inside.
The number that stops the mixing
A fluid whose density falls with height resists being stirred, and the resistance has a threshold at exactly one quarter, from an energy balance with no fluid mechanics in it. The waves such a fluid carries are stranger still — their frequency decides the direction they travel in and says nothing about their wavelength.
Where a fluid stops being one
The Knudsen number is the mean free path over the size of the thing, and at one a molecule crosses the whole channel between collisions. The continuum equations with a no-slip wall are already one per cent wrong at one part in five hundred and ninety-four, which is a factor nothing about the definition would suggest.
Slow enough to be steady
A wing moving slowly enough is assumed to carry the lift its instantaneous angle asks for. The reduced frequency has two thresholds — one where the apparent-mass and circulatory lifts are equal, and one where the quasi-steady answer stops being right — and they are a hundred and seventy-eight apart.
The layer with no length in it
The logarithm in a turbulent wall profile does not come from any model of turbulence. It comes from a region where neither of the flow's two lengths is allowed to appear, and where a velocity gradient therefore has nothing to depend on but the distance to the wall. The constant in it has never been derived from anything.
How small is small enough
Creeping flow drops the inertia terms and gets an exact answer for the drag on a sphere. The Reynolds number at which those terms are equal is one — and at one, Stokes' law is already sixteen per cent low. The honest boundary is 0.054, and the reason it is so far down is the same reason the theory needed repairing in the first place.
The size a drop is allowed
The Bond number sets a drop's weight against the force its own skin can supply, and it is one when they are equal. By then the drop is a bun — it is a per cent from being a ball at Bond number 0.0079, which is a water drop half a millimetre across.
The one exact result
Almost nothing in turbulence follows from the equations without a model in it. One thing does — Kolmogorov's four-fifths law, which fixes the third moment of the velocity differences at −(4/5)εr with no adjustable constant anywhere in it. The companion two-thirds law is not exact, and the 4.02 everybody quotes in it turns out to be a gamma function.
The drop that is not a tear
A falling raindrop is flattened along the direction it is going, by the pressure of the air passing it rather than by its own weight, and the group that decides is the Weber number. The teardrop of every illustration has the wrong symmetry entirely — there is no up in the problem it is drawn for.
Which speed goes in the number
The most quoted threshold in the subject — air is incompressible below Mach 0.3 — is a five per cent tolerance on the density at a stagnation point wearing a physical boundary's clothes. A wing working for its living is at Mach 0.55 over its shoulder while the free stream is still at 0.3.
The balance that is its own error
Geostrophic balance is licensed by the Rossby number being small, and the fractional error in the geostrophic wind is the Rossby number — exactly, not approximately. So the balance everybody uses at Ro of order one is a hundred per cent wrong, and the same quadratic has a hard limit at a quarter that no anticyclone can pass.
The tracer that is not one
Every Stokes number is built on a relaxation time that counts the particle's own inertia and nothing else. Adding the two terms it leaves out gives a bubble a relaxation time where the usual formula gives zero, makes a neutrally buoyant tracer half as slow again as advertised, and sends bubbles into vortex cores that droplets are flung out of.
One number picks the machine
A flow rate, a head and a shaft speed contain exactly one dimensionless combination with no size in it. That combination decides whether a duty wants an impulse wheel, a Francis runner or a propeller — before anything has been drawn, sized, or costed.
The threshold the walls decide
A layer heated from below convects at a Rayleigh number of 1707.762, and nothing whatever happens at one. The free–free case has a closed form and the two that do not differ from it by a factor of 2.6 — produced by nothing but what the top and bottom surfaces are permitted to do.
Where the parabola goes
A pipe carrying a steady flow has a parabolic profile, and the Womersley number is supposed to say when an oscillating one still does. For the flow rate it is very nearly honest — one per cent at α = 0.91 — and for the phase it is out by a factor of three, because a lag is second order in the number and an amplitude deficit is fourth.
Five numbers, one name
The Richardson number has a threshold at a quarter, and the quarter belongs to one of the five quantities that go by the name. On a single tanh shear layer they run from J to seventeen J, and the largest of them grows without limit as the measurement is extended further from the layer.
How far before the heat arrives
A duct's thermal entry length is quoted everywhere as x/(D·Re·Pr) = 0.05, with no tolerance attached. Working out what it delivers gives a Nusselt number 1.45 per cent above the developed value — and the developed value itself is not a term ratio at all but an eigenvalue, 3.6568, which is also the rate at which the duct forgets its inlet.
A limit nothing reaches
A dimensional argument that succeeds says a variable has dropped out of the answer. The Blasius profile has no Reynolds number in its shape at any Reynolds number; the overlap layer's power-law exponent is still 0.102 at Re_τ of a million and falls as a logarithm, so the limit exists and nothing ever gets there.
The number that really is one
Almost every threshold in this subject sits somewhere other than where its dimensionless group is one. The Froude number does not. At Fr = 1 a disturbance stops being able to travel upstream, the specific energy is least and the equations change type — three statements, one number, and no tolerance anywhere in it.
A number that is only the shape of the hole
The friction factor times the Reynolds number for laminar flow in a duct is a pure number that depends on the cross-section's shape and on nothing else — not the fluid, not the size, not the flow rate. It is exactly 64 for a circle and exactly 96 for a slot, and the correlation that treats them as the same is wrong by a third.
The duty that had no machine
Some duties have a specific speed outside every band, and no runner will do them at any size because the number contains no size. That is true and it is not the end. The same group says how to split the duty until it fits, and the two ways of splitting move it along the same axis in opposite directions, by exponents read straight off it.
The gap that carries the most
A bearing's most consequential dimension is decided by a number with no oil in it, no speed and no size — the root of one transcendental equation, at 2.1887048. And the maximum it sits on is flat enough that the value printed in every handbook is not it.
The three that never converge
Oseen's drag coefficient, the overlap layer's power-law exponent and the enstrophy range's slope are three separate disappointments in three different fields. They are one piece of arithmetic, and the arithmetic says why none of them will ever be reached.
The group with no head in it
The number that picks a machine says nothing about whether the machine can exist. A second group formed from the same variables, with the delivered head replaced by the margin available at the inlet, decides that — and the delivered head has left the expression entirely, so how far a pump lifts is irrelevant to whether it tears the liquid apart at its own entrance.
Where a pure number comes from
Sixty-four for a round pipe, sixteen twenty-sevenths for a wind turbine, 0.332 for Blasius. Counting dimensions produces none of them — it produces the list of arguments, and the function has to be solved. Which of the four ways it was solved decides how many digits are worth printing.
The stress that picks the aerodynamics
The free term in a rotor's pressure rise wants radius and speed, and both are capped by something with no fluid in it. Integrate a blade's own weight outward and the root stress comes out as the annulus area times the square of the shaft speed — with the chord cancelled, the blade count cancelled, and every property of the gas cancelled.
The specific speed a pump spends its life at
A pump is chosen by its specific speed at its best point and then run somewhere else. Written in the pump's own coefficients the number is √φ/ψ^¾, a position along its characteristic, and a variable-speed drive keeps it there only when the system it pumps into has no static lift. Every metre of lift moves a slowed pump along its own curve, towards shut-off, and a throttle moves it further.
The fraction that is really four thirds
Turbulence has two exact results, not one. The second is about a scalar carried by the flow, its constant is four thirds rather than four fifths, and the difference between the two fractions has nothing in it about turbulence at all — it is the price of writing a three-component object in terms of one component.
Why the list is this long
Every textbook list of exact solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations is about a dozen long, and the usual explanation is that the equations are hard. It is not the reason. A similarity reduction is a solution invariant under a subgroup of the equations' own symmetries, so the catalogue of possible reductions is the catalogue of subgroups — and that is a finite, countable object.
A damper that turns into a spring
A film of oil squeezed between two plates resists motion and stores nothing, and that is a property of the oil rather than of the film. Fill the same gap with air and the same equation gives a film that stores and resists nothing — above a squeeze number of six, with nothing changed but the frequency and the gap.
One curve for every thickness
Near Mach one there is no linear theory, so there is no superposition, no scaling of a solution by the thing that caused it, and no shortcut of any kind. There is exactly one thing left — a change of variables in which the thickness and the Mach number vanish and only their combination survives — and it is worth more than the theory that was lost.
The best a tube can do is its own radius
Taylor's dispersion coefficient rises without limit with velocity, so there is no best speed to run a tube at. Ask instead how much a slug spreads per metre travelled and an optimum appears at once — and the spreading there is the tube's radius over the square root of three, with no diffusivity and no velocity left in it.
A cascade that arrives as stripes
Two-dimensional turbulence sends its energy upward in scale and, on a plane, piles it into a pair of vortices filling the box. On a rotating planet one extra term in the vorticity equation blocks that in every direction but one, and what arrives at the large scales is not a vortex at all but a set of bands.
The current that runs across the river
The standard channel calculation is one-dimensional, and a river is not. Put a bend in it and the surface tilts by a few centimetres, which is invisible — and a helix forms, a few per cent of the main flow, which decides where the river will be in a hundred years.
A drag that needs a discontinuity
A closed body in a steady inviscid flow has no drag, and the transonic equation obeys that as faithfully as any other — until a shock appears inside its own answer. Then the same pressure integral that was zero to five decimal places becomes four decades larger, with no viscosity added and nothing about the body changed.
When the flux outruns the pressure
A kinematic wave is derived by throwing the momentum equation away, and the derivation never says when that is allowed. It is allowed until the kinematic wave, which travels faster than the water, overtakes the downstream dynamic wave as well — at which point uniform flow ceases to exist and a concrete chute carries a train of surges instead of a sheet.
Transport with nothing transported
Taylor's mechanism needs shear and diffusion and nothing else — and in particular it does not need a mean flow. Oscillate a tube about a fixed position and the tracer still spreads along it, by hundreds of times the molecular rate, which is how a patient is ventilated with a tidal volume smaller than the airway it goes down.
The drag that can only see one curve
A slender body's far field is a line of sources of strength A′(x), and nothing else about its shape reaches it. So its supersonic wave drag depends on the cross-sectional area distribution alone — and a fuselage cut away where the wing joins it can carry the wing for nothing.
Two drags, or nothing swims
A bacterium turns a corkscrew and goes forward, and the reason is not the corkscrew. It is that a thin filament dragged broadside resists more than the same filament dragged end-on. Make the two resistances equal and the thrust is not small but exactly zero, for every pitch and every rate.
A cavity that cools the water it came from
The usual account takes the vapour pressure as a property of the liquid, looked up once. It is a property of the liquid at whatever temperature the cavity has left it — and making vapour costs latent heat, so a cavity suppresses itself. In cold water that is unmeasurable and in liquid hydrogen it is the dominant term.
The heat of a squeeze leaves across the gap
Squeeze a film of air and it warms, and whether that heat reaches the walls in time decides whether the gas is compressed isothermally or adiabatically. The natural estimate has the heat leaving the way the gas does, along the disc, and puts the thermal crossing beside the viscous one. It leaves across the gap instead, a distance hundreds of times shorter, so the crossing sits decades away — and when a film does reach it, what it gains is not stiffness but a second band of loss.
A foil flies level through a short sea and follows a long one
A foiling boat in waves has two ways to fly. It can hold its height and let the surface rise and fall over its foil, or it can follow the surface and heave with every wave. Flying level costs a deeper ride and a few per cent of drag whatever the wavelength; following costs the square of the heave, which grows with the frequency the boat meets the waves at. Into a head sea the two cost the same at a wavelength of about sixteen metres, running with the waves at about six, and the wave's height hardly moves either.
The air a cavity releases is capped by the cavity
When a shut valve pulls the pressure behind it down, the air dissolved in the water starts to come out, and a little gas was already known to soften the hammer. But air leaves the water only while its pressure in the cavity is below the pressure the water was saturated at, so a cavity can fill with at most its own volume of air at that pressure — a seven-thousandth of the pipe here, however much water gives up its air and however fast. That is less than a third of what removes the hammer. Released quickly, the air does not cushion the collapse at all: it turns the vapour cavity into an air cavity, and the pulse becomes the column-separation pulse with the margin measured to the atmosphere — taller, on this main.
The gas a reflected shock refuses is inside the layer
A reflected shock in a shock tube bifurcates when the gas in the wall's boundary layer cannot be pushed into the reservoir behind it: its stagnation pressure, in the shock's frame, is below the reservoir's. Mark's criterion asks that of the gas at the wall, and in air it says the bifurcation stops above an incident Mach number of 6.5. But the gas that fails at high Mach numbers is not at the wall. It is inside the layer, heated by friction until it meets the shock too slowly for its sound speed, and on that measure a reflected shock in air bifurcates at every Mach number above 1.3.
A foil in a random sea follows it up to its peak
In a regular wave a foiling boat chooses between holding its height and following the surface. A real sea is a spectrum, and a wand that filters its signal can do both at once: follow the long waves and fly level through the short. The best place to divide them is close to the frequency of the sea's own peak, the divided control beats either pure strategy, and in a rough sea it is the only one of the three that keeps the foil a safe distance under the surface and the drag near its calm-water value.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Model limitMeasurementThresholdSimilarityOptimisationToleranceRegimeScalingEfficiencyConservationConvergenceCorrelation