Viscous diffusion — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The spin that feeds itself
Stretch a vortex tube and its spin rises in exact proportion, because the circulation round it cannot change and its area has fallen. Nothing in that argument sets a limit — and the one flow where the limit can be written down exactly puts it at a length of √(4ν/α).
The wall that shakes
Slide a wall back and forth in its own plane and the fluid above it does not follow — a wave travels upwards into the fluid and dies within one wavelength. The depth it reaches is √(2ν/ω), it contains no length from the geometry at all, and the whole thing is one of the very few exact solutions the Navier–Stokes equations have.
Universal, and one of five
A turbulence that has run its Reynolds number down stops being turbulent, the equations go linear, and the decay picks up a new exponent. That exponent is quoted everywhere as 5/2 and as universal. It is neither: it is the same corner of the same spectrum deciding the answer a second time.
The solution that keeps its nonlinear term
Every exact solution before this one has been exact because the nonlinear term vanished. A rotating disc's does not vanish — at the wall it is the whole of the balance — and the reduction is exact anyway, because the radius divides out of all three momentum equations at once.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Navier–Stokes equationsBoundary layerExact solutionModel limitPenetration depthBurgers vortexCirculationDecayEnergy cascadeFinal periodInitial conditionIntegral scale