Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Reynolds number — where it appears

The ratio of inertia to viscosity for a given flow. It decides which of the two terms may be neglected and where, and two flows sharing it are the same flow at different sizes — which is what makes model testing possible.

Named by 39 essays across 6 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Reynolds number: one number, four different flows. Reynolds number is inertia ÷ viscosity. It is not a property of the fluid or of the shape but of the combination, and crossing a threshold changes the physics rather than the magnitude.

One number decides which physics applies

A bacterium and a whale both swim, and they are not doing the same thing at different sizes. The ratio of inertia to viscosity separates them, and crossing it changes the rules rather than the magnitudes.

regimes · Reynolds The laminar line does not end; the flow leaves it. Friction factor against Reynolds number in a pipe. The laminar law f = 64/Re is exact and is drawn continuing past the transitional Reynolds number, faintly, because it remains a solution there — the flow simply stops taking it. The turbulent branch is Blasius' correlation and begins where experiments find transition, not where any calculation puts it.

The solutions stop being chosen

Hagen and Poiseuille's pipe profile is an exact solution of the Navier–Stokes equations at every Reynolds number, and it is linearly stable at every Reynolds number. Something else happens at 2300 anyway, and it is not that the solution stopped being one.

turbulence · Transition Reynolds number: one number, four different flows. Reynolds number is inertia ÷ viscosity. It is not a property of the fluid or of the shape but of the combination, and crossing a threshold changes the physics rather than the magnitude.

The Reynolds number, and the length in it

The most useful number in fluid mechanics has an arbitrary quantity buried in it, and quoting one without saying which length was used makes it meaningless. That detail is where most misuse comes from.

regimes · Reynolds Two drag laws, one derived and one fitted. Flat-plate drag coefficient against Reynolds number, laminar and turbulent, on log axes. The laminar curve is Blasius' similarity solution, solved by shooting; the turbulent one is the 1/7-power correlation, which was fitted to experiment and is drawn dashed-in-kind to keep the difference visible. Their slopes differ — −1/2 against −1/5 — so the gap between them widens rather than staying put.

The number that is not a number

Transition Reynolds numbers are quoted to three figures and vary by two decades. That is not sloppiness in the measurement — it is the honest report of a quantity that depends on the laboratory as much as on the fluid, and knowing which part is which decides what may be designed on it.

turbulence · Transition Flow past a cylinder at Re 100. A real fluid past a circular cylinder. At low Reynolds number the flow closes up behind the body much as the ideal theory says; as it rises the flow separates and a region of reversed flow appears behind, which is where drag comes from.

The two theories, side by side

The exact solution and the real flow, for the same body in the same stream. One is beautiful and predicts nothing has drag; the other is approximate and has a wake in it. Where they agree and where they part is the whole map of the subject.

viscous · Comparison The chart, with one exact line on it. The friction factor of a pipe against Reynolds number, for five relative roughnesses. Every curve here except one is Colebrook's correlation, solved by iteration rather than read off a chart. The exception is the short straight line at the left: f = 64/Re is the laminar solution and it is exact. The curves flatten to the right because once the roughness pokes out of the viscous layer the Reynolds number has nothing left to change.

The roughness a wall cannot feel

A rough pipe and a polished one carry the same flow for the same pressure over three decades of Reynolds number, and then suddenly they do not. What changed is not the pipe. It is the thickness of the film of fluid at the wall, which is the only part of the flow that can see the roughness at all.

applied · Internal flow Reynolds number: one number, four different flows. Reynolds number is inertia ÷ viscosity. It is not a property of the fluid or of the shape but of the combination, and crossing a threshold changes the physics rather than the magnitude.

The model that cannot be matched

A scale model behaves like the real thing when its dimensionless numbers agree. With one number that is a matter of choosing the tunnel speed. With two it is usually impossible, and every wind-tunnel result ever published has been obtained in spite of that.

regimes · Similarity Creeping flow, and the same body with inertia. The exact creeping-flow solution beside a solved field at a Reynolds number where inertia matters. The creeping flow is a mirror image of itself front to back — a photograph of it run backwards is a photograph of it — and the field with inertia has a wake, which is what a direction of time looks like.

The world with no inertia

Drop the viscosity and the equations become exactly solvable and wrong about drag. Drop the inertia instead and they become exactly solvable again — and for a cylinder in an unbounded fluid there is no solution at all, which took fifty years to notice and longer to fix.

regimes · Reynolds 5 quantities, 3 rows, 2 left over. The dimension matrix for the drag on a sphere: one column per quantity, one row per base dimension, and every entry an exponent. Buckingham's theorem is a statement about this matrix and nothing else — the number of independent dimensionless groups is the number of columns minus the rank, computed here by elimination. Nothing about fluids enters until somebody decides which columns to write down.

Counting what matters

Five quantities decide the drag on a sphere, and the experiment that measures it has one curve in it rather than a five-dimensional table. The reason is a rank: the matrix of dimensions has three independent rows, and what is left over is the number of dimensionless groups the answer can possibly depend on.

regimes · Dimensional The cliff a rough ball reaches sooner. The drag coefficient of a sphere against Reynolds number, on log axes. The smooth curve is Morrison's correlation, which is a fit to measurements and is drawn in the colour this site reserves for a borrowed claim. The other is the same curve shifted along the Reynolds axis by a factor of 6 — a stated model of what roughness does, which is to trip the boundary layer early, and not a measurement of any real ball.

The drag that falls as it speeds up

There is a band of speeds in which a smooth ball experiences less drag the faster it goes. Not a smaller coefficient — a smaller force. Dimples move that band down to where a golf ball actually flies, and they do it by making the friction worse.

applied · Sport ball Grid points against Reynolds number, and where a wing sits. The number of grid points needed to resolve every scale of a turbulent flow, which is Re^(9/4) — the cube of the ratio between the largest scale and the Kolmogorov scale. The line is the arithmetic and the marks are flows a reader can picture. An airliner's wing needs about 10¹⁷ points, and the largest calculations ever run are around 10¹².

The grid nobody can build

Resolving every scale of a turbulent flow needs Re to the nine-quarters grid points and Re cubed point-updates. An airliner's wing comes to 2·10¹⁷ points against the 10¹² of the largest calculation ever run, and no amount of patience closes a gap of five orders of magnitude.

turbulence · Cascade Two drag laws, one derived and one fitted. Flat-plate drag coefficient against Reynolds number, laminar and turbulent, on log axes. The laminar curve is Blasius' similarity solution, solved by shooting; the turbulent one is the 1/7-power correlation, which was fitted to experiment and is drawn dashed-in-kind to keep the difference visible. Their slopes differ — −1/2 against −1/5 — so the gap between them widens rather than staying put.

The cost of going turbulent

A turbulent boundary layer costs several times the friction of a laminar one, and the multiple is not a constant — it rises with Reynolds number, because the two laws have different exponents. That is why laminar flow is worth more on a long fast surface than on a short slow one.

viscous · Drag budget The Ohnesorge diagram, with the boundaries where they belong. The classical map of jet break-up: the Ohnesorge number against the jet Reynolds number, with the five nozzles placed on it. The three sloping lines are Reitz's transitions in the gas Weber number, and their geometry is computed rather than sketched — a fixed We_g means Oh·Re is fixed, which is a straight line of slope exactly −1 in these coordinates, and the assertion checks that a decade in Reynolds number moves each line by exactly one decade. Where they sit is borrowed; that they are straight and parallel is not. A nozzle below and to the right of the last line atomises.

Where a jet stops being a jet

A tap makes drops a few centimetres down, a garden hose makes a stream that carries, a sprayer makes a mist and a diesel injector makes fog. Same liquid, same mechanism, four regimes — and the number that separates them is not the jet's inertia but the surrounding air's.

regimes · Atomisation One calculation is about the animal; the other is about how fast it happens to be going. The mean lift coefficient required of each animal's wings, computed two ways, on a log scale. Treating the wings as fixed and flying them at the animal's forward speed gives answers spanning a factor of 29 — from 0.88 to 26 — because the number is governed by a speed that has nothing to do with how the animal makes its lift. Doing the flapping arithmetic gives answers spanning a factor of 1.90. And in a hover the fixed-wing calculation has no answer at all: there is no dynamic pressure, and no coefficient however large will do. That is the version of the famous claim that is actually true, and it is a statement about the calculation rather than about the bee.

The bee that cannot fly

The claim has a traceable origin and the calculation behind it was a real calculation done with the wrong velocity. Doing it with the right one gives a number an aerofoil might plausibly produce — and still leaves a gap, and the gap is what took another sixty years to close.

misconceptions · Bumblebee Stable in every mode, and 100 times larger first. The energy of the worst-case disturbance against time, on a logarithmic scale, at four Reynolds numbers and at the one the slider selects. Time is in units of Re, which is what makes the four curves the same shape; what changes with Reynolds number is the height, and it changes as the square. Every eigenvalue of this operator is negative throughout, so nothing that grows here is an instability in the sense a stability analysis reports.

Every mode decays and it grows anyway

A stability analysis asks whether any mode of a flow grows, and for pipe flow the answer is no, at every Reynolds number, which the pipe disagrees with. The missing ingredient is that the modes are not perpendicular — a disturbance made of two nearly parallel decaying pieces can grow by a factor of Re²/16 before it dies.

turbulence · Transition The air a wing carries along, and how little of it there is. The Blasius profile, in the wing's frame, with the free stream at one. No slip says the air at the surface is at rest relative to the surface, which in the ground's frame means it is moving with the wing — but only exactly at the wall. The deficit, integrated across the layer, is the displacement thickness: at a Reynolds number of 1e+6 and a metre of chord it is 1.72 millimetres of air moving at flight speed, which is the whole of what is 'carried'. The step drawn on the axis is that same deficit as a solid slab. A wing does not drag a blanket of air with it; it leaves a boundary layer behind it, and the layer is made of air that keeps being replaced.

The air a wing does not carry

No slip says the air touching a surface moves with it, and the usual reading is that a wing drags a blanket of air along. The blanket is 1.7 millimetres thick per metre of chord, it is different air every instant, and the drag it costs falls as it gets thicker.

misconceptions · The no-slip condition The jet has to be fed from the sides. The velocity field of the plane jet with streamlines integrated through it. The seven central streamlines run down the jet and spread; the ten started at the top and bottom edges bend inwards and join it, which is entrainment and is a consequence of the solution rather than an addition to it. The dashed lines are the half-speed edges, widening as x^{2/3}. The transverse velocity far from the axis is 5.70e-3 m/s at this station, inward on both sides — a jet is a sink as seen from a distance, which is why two parallel jets pull together.

What a jet keeps, and what it collects

A jet leaving a nozzle into still fluid has no boundary anywhere and one conserved quantity. Its momentum flux is exactly the same at every station downstream; its mass flux is not conserved at all and grows without limit, because a jet is a machine for acquiring fluid it did not start with.

viscous · Free shear The wall's condition, on its way to the middle. Five profiles across the half-channel, from just inside the entrance to fully developed, each drawn at the station where it occurs. The march starts from a slab of uniform flow and never assumes a shape: what arrives at the far end is a parabola, with a centre-line speed of 1.4979 times the mean against the exact 3/2 and a momentum flux of 1.1995 against 6/5. Notice what the middle does while the edges are being slowed: it speeds up, because the flow rate is held, and that acceleration is what the entrance's extra pressure drop pays for.

How far before a duct forgets what was fed into it

A pipe is always drawn with its answer already in place. Getting there takes a distance proportional to the Reynolds number, which means a more viscous fluid is done sooner — and the entrance costs a fixed number of dynamic pressures however long the pipe is.

viscous · Entrance How small is small enough. The error in Stokes' law for the drag on a sphere, against the Reynolds number, both logarithmic. Oseen's correction is the first term the neglected inertia puts back, and it says the error is 3Re/16: one per cent at Re = 16/297 = 0.054, five per cent at 0.28, and already sixteen per cent at Re = 1 — which is the value at which the two terms the Reynolds number compares are equal, and is where every textbook draws the boundary of creeping flow.

How small is small enough

Creeping flow drops the inertia terms and gets an exact answer for the drag on a sphere. The Reynolds number at which those terms are equal is one — and at one, Stokes' law is already sixteen per cent low. The honest boundary is 0.054, and the reason it is so far down is the same reason the theory needed repairing in the first place.

regimes · Reynolds How far downstream the heat is still being made. The dissipation accumulated from a station ahead of a cylinder to a station behind it, as a fraction of the whole of what is made inside the frame, at five Reynolds numbers. At Reynolds number 1 the fluid has finished paying by about a diameter behind the body. At 100 it has not finished at five, and the curve is still climbing at the edge of the picture — the drag is a force on the body, and the heat it stands for is somewhere else.

Where the heat of a drag is made

The power it takes to tow a body through a fluid becomes heat, all of it, eventually. None of the interesting words in that sentence are the first four. It is the "eventually" that decides how a wake behaves, how far a disturbance reaches, and why no box drawn round a body contains its own bill.

viscous · Dissipation Two things moving by a million, and their product standing still. Viscosity, the squared velocity gradient at the dissipation scale, and their product, across six decades of Reynolds number at a fixed large-scale flow. The viscosity falls by a factor of 1e+6; the squared gradient rises by exactly the same factor, because η falls as Re^(−3/4) and u_η as Re^(−1/4); and the dissipation ν(u_η/η)² does not move at all. That is the dissipation anomaly stated as arithmetic: the limit of the dissipation as viscosity vanishes is not the value it takes when viscosity is zero.

The limit that is not the value

Dissipation is viscosity times the square of a velocity gradient, so it ought to vanish as the viscosity does. It does not. The gradient rises by exactly the factor the viscosity falls by, the product stands still, and a fluid with no viscosity at all would dissipate nothing — which is why the limit and the value are different numbers.

turbulence · Dissipation A limit that exists and is never reached. The exponent of the best power law fitted across the overlap layer, against the friction Reynolds number. A logarithm is the zero-exponent member of that family, so the log law is what this sequence is heading for — and it heads there as 1/ln Re_τ, which is the slowest useful way of approaching anything. The exponent is still 0.102 at Re_τ = 10⁶, and driving it to a hundredth needs a Reynolds number with a hundred and fourteen in its logarithm.

A limit nothing reaches

A dimensional argument that succeeds says a variable has dropped out of the answer. The Blasius profile has no Reynolds number in its shape at any Reynolds number; the overlap layer's power-law exponent is still 0.102 at Re_τ of a million and falls as a logarithm, so the limit exists and nothing ever gets there.

regimes · Dimensional The roughness function, and the asymptote in which the viscosity has gone. The whole effect of a rough wall on a turbulent boundary layer is one number: the downward shift of the logarithmic profile. It vanishes on a smooth wall, rises through a transitional band, and becomes (1/kappa)ln(k+) + B − 8.5 — at which point substituting it back leaves u+ = (1/kappa)ln(y/k) + 8.5, with the fluid's own length gone from the answer entirely.

A second length at the wall

The logarithm in a turbulent wall profile exists because a region of the flow is not allowed to know about any length except the distance to the wall. Roughen the surface and there is one it does know about, which belongs neither to the fluid nor to the flow — and the slope does not change at all.

turbulence · Roughness The same flow, from two different physics. Solid lines: the depth-averaged flow between two plates a small distance apart, with an obstacle standing between them. Dashed: the ideal-flow solution for the same obstacle. They are the same field to a part in ten billion, because averaging Stokes flow across a narrow gap gives a velocity that is the gradient of a harmonic potential. The cell has no inertia at all, which is the one hypothesis the ideal theory cannot do without.

The exact theory, drawn by viscosity

Two flat plates a millimetre apart, syrup between them, an obstacle in the gap. The Reynolds number is a hundredth, inertia is absent, and the streamline pattern is the potential flow past that obstacle — exactly, to a part in ten billion. The one hypothesis ideal flow cannot do without is the one this flow most conspicuously breaks.

inviscid · Hele shaw Two decay laws from two invariants, and nothing in the equations to choose. The energy of a decaying turbulence against time, integrated from dK/dt = −A K^(3/2)/l with the large scales conserving u² l³ in one case and u² l⁵ in the other. The exponents come out at 1.1997 and 1.4282 against the closed forms 6/5 and 10/7. Which invariant holds is decided by the shape of the spectrum at the very largest scales, at the moment the stirring stops.

What decay never forgets

Stir a box of fluid and stop. The turbulence decays, at a rate with no viscosity in it — so the rate cannot come from the fluid. It comes from an invariant of the very largest scales, fixed at the moment the stirring stops, and never revisited.

turbulence · Decay Model spectra at four Reynolds numbers, compensated. The spectrum multiplied by k^(5/3) and divided by eps^(2/3), so that a true inertial range is a horizontal line at the Kolmogorov constant. What a finite Reynolds number has instead is a single maximum: it reaches 1.4996 at the highest and 1.49 at the lowest, and the band over which it is flat to one per cent goes from a third of a decade to two.

The range a real Reynolds number does not have

Kolmogorov's minus five thirds is a statement about a band of scales that has forgotten the forcing and does not feel the viscosity. Both conditions are about separation, and separation is exactly what a finite Reynolds number does not have much of.

turbulence · Spectrum Three bluff bodies, whose Strouhal numbers agree once the wake's width is used. The measured Strouhal number of each body, and Roshko's universal number formed with the wake's width and the speed on the free streamline that bounds it. The raw numbers span a factor of 1.462; the collapsed ones span 1.0011, with a mean of 0.16281. The shedding was never body-dependent — the length in the number was.

The frequency a wake chooses

Bluff bodies shed at Strouhal numbers from 0.145 to 0.212, and the spread is not a fact about shedding — it is a fact about which length went into the number. Change the length to the wake's own width and three bodies agree to a tenth of a per cent. Then let the body move, and the number stops deciding anything at all.

regimes · Strouhal Nu/Gr^¼ against the Prandtl number, with the exact solution's points on it. The closed form 0.508 Pr^½(20/21 + Pr)^−¼, over eight decades, with Ostrach's exact similarity values marked. The integral method is two to eight per cent high from Pr = 0.7 upwards and 27 per cent high at Pr = 0.01 — which is where the thermal layer is ten times the momentum layer and giving them one thickness stops being an approximation to anything.

A speed nobody imposed

Every regime number in this collection contains a velocity somebody chose. Natural convection has none: a warm plate makes its own flow, and the Grashof number is what is left when the speed is taken out. The Reynolds number of the result — six thousand, on an ordinary radiator — is an output of the solution rather than a setting on an apparatus.

regimes · Grashof The only candidate the far field allows, and the wall it slips past. The general Stokes solution has four constants; the condition at infinity kills two of them and fixes a third, leaving one to satisfy two conditions at the wall. Setting the stream function to zero there uses it up, and the tangential velocity that remains is exactly twice the free stream — for every radius, every speed, and every fluid.

The flow with no solution

Creeping flow past a sphere has a solution and everybody knows it. Creeping flow past a cylinder has none — not a difficult one, not one needing a clever method. The equations, the no-slip condition and the uniform stream at infinity are inconsistent, and the residual is exactly twice the free stream.

viscous · Stokes' paradox Two lifetimes, crossing. The mean time for a turbulent puff to decay and the mean time for it to split into two, against Reynolds number, on a logarithmic axis spanning thirty orders of magnitude. Below the crossing puffs die faster than they multiply; above it they multiply faster than they die, and the flow stays turbulent.

A puff that does not know how old it is

A patch of turbulence in a pipe below the critical Reynolds number dies at random, and its chance of dying in the next second does not depend on how long it has already lasted. The flow that contains it has a memory anyway, because the patches multiply — and where multiplying overtakes dying is a Reynolds number.

turbulence · Transition Friction lends the crown 28.4 kPa, and the tank takes it back. The absolute pressure at the crown of a siphon with friction in its hose, through a whole drain, for the crown placed at three positions along the hose, against the frictionless constant of 23.01 kPa. With the crown 0.3 of the way it starts at 63.3 kPa, with the crown 0.5 along it starts at 51.5 kPa and with the crown 0.7 of the way it starts at 40.4 kPa. Every curve is above the constant, every curve falls towards it as the level falls, and every curve reaches it at the end — 23.06 kPa with a centimetre of level left. Friction never brings a siphon nearer to breaking; it lends a margin, and the draining tank returns it pascal by pascal, so the worst the crown ever sees is the frictionless value.

The margin friction lends a siphon

Without friction a draining siphon's crown pressure does not depend on the source level at all, and every real hose has friction. It turns out always to raise the crown pressure, by an amount the draining tank hands back pascal by pascal — and how much it lends is decided by where along the hose the crown sits, not by how rough or how narrow the hose is.

misconceptions · Siphon The cushion changes its physics 0.36 mm from the ground. The two forces on a plate 10 cm across closing on a plane at 1 m/s in air at 20 °C, per metre of span, against the gap on logarithmic axes. The viscous squeeze film, Reynolds' lubrication result μVc³/h³, rises as the cube of the closeness; the inertial one, ρV²c³/24h² from the potential flow's added mass, as the square. They are equal where the gap Reynolds number ρVh/μ is exactly 24, at 0.361 mm, where each is 3.84e+2 N/m. Above that gap the cushion is the fluid's inertia and below it the fluid's viscosity — and at the crossover neither formula is accurate, since it is where one limit hands over to the other rather than a solution of the flow between them.

A cushion that changes its physics

A plate closing on a plane is resisted by the fluid it has to squeeze out, and the resistance is two different forces with two different laws — one from the fluid's inertia and one from its viscosity. They hand over at a gap of twenty-four kinematic viscosities per unit of closing speed, which for a wing in air is a third of a millimetre, and the two films disagree about whether the plate ever lands at all.

misconceptions · Ground cushion The eighths nobody chose. Four physical statements — the inner layer sits in the classical one's shear, its inertia balances its own viscous stress, the pressure is of the order of that inertia, and the displacement it makes produces that pressure — are a linear system in four exponents. Solving it gives three eighths, five eighths, one eighth and a quarter, exactly.

The length the limit invents

Prandtl's equations are parabolic, so nothing at one station can depend on anything downstream of it. Every experiment shows the pressure rising ahead of a shock or a step. The resolution is a region three eighths of a power of the Reynolds number long, which the limit that produced the equations was supposed to have removed.

inviscid · Interaction The same data, in a basis the theorem allows just as much. The identical two hundred and forty points, plotted as F/(mu U d) — which is the drag coefficient times the Reynolds number, a perfectly legitimate pi group forming a complete pair with the abscissa. The result is a straight line of slope 0.9985 through five decades with an r-squared of 0.9985, and it contains no physics: the ordinate contains the abscissa.

The groups are not the only groups

Buckingham's theorem fixes how many dimensionless groups an answer can depend on and says nothing about which. Two of the infinitely many legitimate choices are used here on the same data: one manufactures a straight line through five decades out of a constant, and the other erases Stokes' law completely.

regimes · Dimensional A band of growing waves that opens at 5772 and narrows as the viscosity goes. The wavenumbers at which a two-dimensional wave on plane Poiseuille flow neither grows nor decays, against the Reynolds number on a logarithmic axis. Inside the tongue waves grow; outside they decay. The tongue's tip is the critical point. Both edges slope downward and towards each other in wavenumber as the Reynolds number rises, so the band of unstable waves shrinks towards long waves — the direction in which the inviscid problem, which has no growing wave at all, is reached.

The profile Rayleigh cleared and viscosity did not

Flow between two plates has no inflection point, so without viscosity no wave on it can grow. With viscosity one does, above a Reynolds number of 5772. Taking the viscosity away again slows that wave and narrows the band it grows in, because the stress that feeds it is made by viscosity in the first place.

turbulence · Instability Five spectra, five exponents, one linear equation. The energy of a decaying turbulence after the nonlinear term has stopped mattering, computed by integrating the exact modal solution E(k,0)exp(−2 nu k² t) at five different shapes of the spectrum at the origin. Each is a straight line on these axes and no two have the same slope: the exponent is (m+1)/2, where k^m is the spectrum's behaviour at wavenumbers smaller than any eddy. The 5/2 that is quoted as the final period's universal exponent is the m = 4 line and one of five.

Universal, and one of five

A turbulence that has run its Reynolds number down stops being turbulent, the equations go linear, and the decay picks up a new exponent. That exponent is quoted everywhere as 5/2 and as universal. It is neither: it is the same corner of the same spectrum deciding the answer a second time.

turbulence · Decay The coefficient that was a constant, against the number it is said not to depend on. The dissipation coefficient Cε = eps·l/u³ along two decays, plotted against the Taylor-scale Reynolds number they pass through. One is flat because it was put in flat; the other falls as the reciprocal of the Reynolds number, which is what is measured in the near field of a grid. Neither line is a derivation. What is exact is the relation between them, Cε = 15(ℓ/λ)/Reλ, which is a rearrangement of two definitions and holds along both curves to 5·10⁻¹⁶.

The constant that travels

Every decay law in the subject rests on the dissipation being some constant times u³ over a length. The constant is not one. Letting it move the way grid measurements say it moves changes the decay exponent by a quarter — and lands one of the answers five per cent from another that is entirely different physics.

turbulence · Decay One curve from two to one, with four thirds somewhere in the middle. The ratio of the transverse second-order structure function to the longitudinal one, against separation, at three Reynolds numbers. Every value on every curve follows from the longitudinal function alone by a relation with no dynamics in it. It is exactly 2 where the field is smooth, exactly 1 beyond the correlation length, and it passes through four thirds on the way — but it passes through rather than resting there, and how nearly it rests is the whole of what a Reynolds number buys.

A relation with no turbulence in it

Isotropy and incompressibility alone fix the transverse structure function from the longitudinal one. Divide the relation through and it says the ratio of the two is one plus half the local slope — so the exponent everybody measures as 0.70 and the ratio everybody measures as 1.35 are one measurement, and a model spectrum with no intermittency in it produces both.

turbulence · Structure function The plateau everybody looks for is a summit, and a low one. −Dₗₗₗ/((4/5)εr) against separation in decaying turbulence at five Taylor-scale Reynolds numbers. None has a plateau at one. Each rises through the viscous range and turns over, peaking at 0.49, 0.63, 0.75, 0.85, 0.90 for Reλ = 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000. A measurement of ε that takes the largest value of this curve as four-fifths reads each of those shortfalls as a smaller dissipation.

The decay inside the four-fifths law

The four-fifths law gives the dissipation of turbulence from one measured moment with no constant in it, which makes it the obvious way to measure how the dissipation coefficient travels during a decay. But the law is exact only in a limit, and a decaying flow is not in it. The decay itself takes a quarter off the moment at the Reynolds numbers grids reach — and the bias moves as the flow decays, by a sixth, in the direction opposite to the effect being looked for.

turbulence · Decay

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Model limitMeasurementBoundary layerDissipationCorrelationTransitionCreeping flowSimilarityViscosityDimensionlessLinear stabilityModel validity

All concepts