Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Creeping flow — where it appears

The limit in which inertia is entirely negligible, leaving a linear and exactly reversible equation. A flow in it undoes its own stirring when run backwards, and a body in it feels a drag proportional to its speed rather than to its square.

Named by 27 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Reynolds number: one number, four different flows. Reynolds number is inertia ÷ viscosity. It is not a property of the fluid or of the shape but of the combination, and crossing a threshold changes the physics rather than the magnitude.

One number decides which physics applies

A bacterium and a whale both swim, and they are not doing the same thing at different sizes. The ratio of inertia to viscosity separates them, and crossing it changes the rules rather than the magnitudes.

regimes · Reynolds Creeping flow, and the same body with inertia. The exact creeping-flow solution beside a solved field at a Reynolds number where inertia matters. The creeping flow is a mirror image of itself front to back — a photograph of it run backwards is a photograph of it — and the field with inertia has a wake, which is what a direction of time looks like.

The world with no inertia

Drop the viscosity and the equations become exactly solvable and wrong about drag. Drop the inertia instead and they become exactly solvable again — and for a cylinder in an unbounded fluid there is no solution at all, which took fifty years to notice and longer to fix.

regimes · Reynolds 20.45 MPa out of a film 25 µm thick. The pressure along a tapered pad, from the closed-form solution of Reynolds' equation, with the same equation's tridiagonal grid solve drawn over it as points. The peak is 20.45 MPa — enough to yield mild steel — and it sits at 69 per cent of the way along rather than in the middle, because the pressure gradient vanishes where the film equals the harmonic mean of its two ends and the harmonic mean is biased towards the thinner one. The pad's own shape is drawn along the top, to a vertical scale of its own. Nothing pumps this oil: the runner drags it into a narrowing gap and the gap does the rest.

Nothing but the shape of the gap

A machine that holds a steel shaft off its bearing with a film of oil twenty-five microns thick has no pump in it, and the pressure it generates would yield mild steel. The mechanism is not the oil and not the speed; it is that the gap narrows.

viscous · Lubrication 45° of corner, and an infinite number of eddies in it. The creeping flow in a corner of 45 degrees, drawn from Moffatt's similarity solution. Each eddy turns the opposite way to its neighbours and is 3.17 times smaller and 1.6e+3 times weaker than the one outside it. The contour levels are rescaled inside each eddy, because they differ in strength by three orders of magnitude per step and a single set of levels would show the first and nothing else — which is itself the reason nobody has seen the third. The dividing lines between eddies are drawn where the stream function changes sign, and the dots are the centres, both found from the solved field.

The eddies nobody stirs

A slow flow past the mouth of a sharp corner does not simply fail to get in. The corner fills with an infinite sequence of counter-rotating eddies, each about three times smaller and sixteen hundred times weaker than the last, and the whole structure is decided by one complex number.

viscous · Corner How small is small enough. The error in Stokes' law for the drag on a sphere, against the Reynolds number, both logarithmic. Oseen's correction is the first term the neglected inertia puts back, and it says the error is 3Re/16: one per cent at Re = 16/297 = 0.054, five per cent at 0.28, and already sixteen per cent at Re = 1 — which is the value at which the two terms the Reynolds number compares are equal, and is where every textbook draws the boundary of creeping flow.

How small is small enough

Creeping flow drops the inertia terms and gets an exact answer for the drag on a sphere. The Reynolds number at which those terms are equal is one — and at one, Stokes' law is already sixteen per cent low. The honest boundary is 0.054, and the reason it is so far down is the same reason the theory needed repairing in the first place.

regimes · Reynolds How far downstream the heat is still being made. The dissipation accumulated from a station ahead of a cylinder to a station behind it, as a fraction of the whole of what is made inside the frame, at five Reynolds numbers. At Reynolds number 1 the fluid has finished paying by about a diameter behind the body. At 100 it has not finished at five, and the curve is still climbing at the edge of the picture — the drag is a force on the body, and the heat it stands for is somewhere else.

Where the heat of a drag is made

The power it takes to tow a body through a fluid becomes heat, all of it, eventually. None of the interesting words in that sentence are the first four. It is the "eventually" that decides how a wake behaves, how far a disturbance reaches, and why no box drawn round a body contains its own bill.

viscous · Dissipation A sphere does not go at the speed of the flow it is in. How far a force-free sphere on the axis of a round tube lags the fluid at its own centre, against its size. The lag is two-thirds of the square of the size ratio and comes from the reciprocal theorem in one line: the sphere moves at the average of the ambient flow over its own surface, and a parabolic profile is slower everywhere on that surface than at the middle. At a fifth of the tube's radius the lag is 2.7 per cent, which is the difference between a tracer and a thing being measured.

A force without the flow that makes it

A sphere carried along by a flow does not travel at the speed of the fluid at its centre. It travels at the average of the flow over its own surface — and getting that result needs no solution of the flow around the sphere at all, only the answer to a completely different problem that everybody already knows.

viscous · Reciprocity Two velocities, 2.50 apart, and only one of them is anybody's. The velocity in Darcy's law is the flow rate divided by the whole cross-section, solid included: a speed no fluid particle ever has, since the fluid occupies only the fraction ε of that area. The speed the fluid actually averages is larger by exactly 1/ε — 2.50 times here — and it is the one that belongs in a residence time, in a pore Reynolds number and in any statement about when a tracer arrives. The grains are drawn to say that the pore-scale flow is not computed here: nothing above resolves it.

A velocity nobody has

The velocity in Darcy's law is the flow rate divided by the whole cross-section, solid included — a speed no fluid particle in the bed ever has. Averaging buys a linear law and charges for it in exactly this coin, and the constant that comes with it is an area of about a square micron.

applied · Porous The same flow, from two different physics. Solid lines: the depth-averaged flow between two plates a small distance apart, with an obstacle standing between them. Dashed: the ideal-flow solution for the same obstacle. They are the same field to a part in ten billion, because averaging Stokes flow across a narrow gap gives a velocity that is the gradient of a harmonic potential. The cell has no inertia at all, which is the one hypothesis the ideal theory cannot do without.

The exact theory, drawn by viscosity

Two flat plates a millimetre apart, syrup between them, an obstacle in the gap. The Reynolds number is a hundredth, inertia is absent, and the streamline pattern is the potential flow past that obstacle — exactly, to a part in ten billion. The one hypothesis ideal flow cannot do without is the one this flow most conspicuously breaks.

inviscid · Hele-shaw Where Einstein's line stops being the measurement. The viscosity of a suspension of rigid spheres relative to the liquid's, against the volume fraction. Einstein's 1 + 5φ/2 is exact for one sphere and holds while the spheres cannot feel one another, which is up to about five per cent by volume. Batchelor and Green's two-sphere term takes it a little further; beyond about a fifth nothing derived works and the curve drawn is a fit, which diverges at a maximum packing that is itself a measurement.

A viscosity made of particles

Stir rigid spheres into a liquid and the mixture is thicker, by five halves of the volume fraction. Einstein's coefficient is not an empirical constant — it is a dissipation calculation on one sphere — and doing it as an energy rather than as a stress shows that four-fifths of it comes from somewhere nobody mentions.

viscous · Suspension Two-thirds to one, and nothing outside it. The drag on a spherical drop as a fraction of Stokes' drag on a rigid sphere of the same size, against the ratio of the viscosities. It runs from exactly two-thirds for a clean gas bubble to exactly one for a rigid particle and takes no value outside that range, however light or heavy the drop is — the formula has no density in it anywhere. A drop of water in air and a drop of mercury in water sit at opposite ends of it.

The surface that moves with the flow

A clean gas bubble feels two-thirds of the drag a rigid sphere of the same size would, and the formula has no density in it anywhere. What buys the third is that the bubble's surface is free to move — and real bubbles in ordinary water do not get it, for a reason that is a millionth of a per cent of the water by mass.

viscous · Mobile interface Drop deformation in simple shear, against the capillary number. The shape model's steady deformation for six viscosity ratios. Every curve is linear in the capillary number at small Ca — which is Taylor's result — and every one of them saturates, at 5/2(2λ+3), because the shear's own rotation turns the drop out of the stretching direction. A drop in simple shear cannot be deformed beyond that however hard it is sheared.

The number that cannot break a drop

The capillary number sets the stress that stretches a drop against the stress that holds it round, and it predicts the deformation beautifully. It cannot predict the breakup, because above a viscosity ratio of about four a drop in simple shear cannot be broken at any shear rate — and the theory that says the ratio hardly matters is the same theory that gets the deformation right.

regimes · Capillary A swimmer that dissipates the same everywhere. Taylor's waving sheet, with the wave drawn along the bottom and the dissipation drawn against height above it. The dissipation function works out at 4μb²c²k⁶y²e^{−2ky} — with no x in it at all, so the sheet is destroying energy at the same rate under every part of the wave and at every instant of the cycle. It peaks one radian of wavelength above the sheet and is gone within about three.

A swimmer that cannot go backwards

Taylor's waving sheet is the simplest self-propelled object in a viscous fluid, and its arithmetic contains a result that reads like a mistake — the work it does to travel a metre does not depend on how big its waves are. Doubling the amplitude quadruples both the speed and the power, and changes the bill for the journey by nothing at all.

viscous · Swimming The only candidate the far field allows, and the wall it slips past. The general Stokes solution has four constants; the condition at infinity kills two of them and fixes a third, leaving one to satisfy two conditions at the wall. Setting the stream function to zero there uses it up, and the tangential velocity that remains is exactly twice the free stream — for every radius, every speed, and every fluid.

The flow with no solution

Creeping flow past a sphere has a solution and everybody knows it. Creeping flow past a cylinder has none — not a difficult one, not one needing a clever method. The equations, the no-slip condition and the uniform stream at infinity are inconsistent, and the residual is exactly twice the free stream.

viscous · Stokes' paradox And they are one piece of arithmetic. All three corrections against one over the logarithm of their own large parameter. Each is a straight line through the origin, with its own slope: one third exactly for the enstrophy range, near one for the wall layer, and near ln 10 for Oseen's per-decade measure. Three disappointments in three different fields, written up separately, are the same function.

The three that never converge

Oseen's drag coefficient, the overlap layer's power-law exponent and the enstrophy range's slope are three separate disappointments in three different fields. They are one piece of arithmetic, and the arithmetic says why none of them will ever be reached.

regimes · Crossover The best efficiency runs from nine-eighths of φ² to one. The best efficiency a peristaltic pump can reach, against the fraction of the channel its wave closes, with its two limits. For a shallow wave it is 9φ²/8, which is small — a wave closing a fifth of the channel is at best 4.5 per cent efficient. As the wave closes the channel the best efficiency tends to one, and its shortfall shrinks in proportion to the remaining gap: about 1.9(1 − φ). Nothing in between is independent of the amplitude.

The pump that is better the more it squeezes

A waving sheet swims at a cost per metre with no amplitude in it. A waving wall pumping fluid is the same mechanism turned round, and its efficiency is nothing like that: it starts at nine-eighths of the amplitude ratio squared, is exactly 2 − √3 at half closure, and rises towards one as the wave closes the tube — where the pump stops being a wave and becomes a piston.

kinematics · Continuity Three strokes, and only the flat one is a theorem. Three cycles drawn in the swimmer's shape space: a square, a circle of the same width, and an out-and-back along the diagonal. The first two enclose area and carry the swimmer forward; the third encloses none and carries it exactly nowhere, which is the scallop theorem with no symmetry argument in it. What the third lacks is not a broken symmetry but an interior.

A stroke is worth the area it encloses

The usual account of swimming without inertia is a symmetry argument about reciprocal strokes, which says what cannot work and nothing about what does. Draw the stroke in the space of the swimmer's own shapes and the displacement is a line integral — so it is an area, it does not depend on how fast the stroke is played, and the scallop theorem is Stokes' theorem.

viscous · Swimming The only term that turns spin into thrust, and what it is made of. The coupling term of the propulsion matrix against the drag anisotropy, with the geometry held fixed. It is exactly proportional to the difference of the two drag coefficients, so it is zero when they are equal — not small, zero — and no helix of any pitch turned at any rate would move. A real filament sits at 1.66, which is a third of the way from useless to the unreachable limit.

Two drags, or nothing swims

A bacterium turns a corkscrew and goes forward, and the reason is not the corkscrew. It is that a thin filament dragged broadside resists more than the same filament dragged end-on. Make the two resistances equal and the thrust is not small but exactly zero, for every pitch and every rate.

viscous · Swimming The speed past the flank, in the cell and in the ideal flow it is meant to show. The gap-averaged speed along the top of a cylinder, against the distance from its surface in cylinder radii, for three cells — the cylinder's radius 10, 35 and 100 times the Brinkman length h/√12 — and for ideal flow. Ideal flow slides along the wall at twice the stream speed. The cell's flow must stop at the wall and does so in a layer a few Brinkman lengths thick, outside which it rejoins the ideal curve.

The cell draws a larger cylinder

A Hele-Shaw cell draws the streamlines of ideal flow past an obstacle and cannot obey the one rule ideal flow breaks: the fluid must stop at the obstacle's wall. It does stop there, in a layer a third of the gap thick, and far away the whole correction amounts to one thing — the cell is drawing ideal flow past a cylinder one layer-thickness too big, and the obstacle has exactly that cylinder's drag.

inviscid · Hele-shaw The orbits a rod's axis can be on, seen along the vorticity. The tip of the unit vector along a rod of aspect ratio five, tumbling in a simple shear, seen from along the vorticity axis, for five values of the orbit constant. Every orbit is closed and every one takes the same time. A rod near the centre is spinning about the vorticity axis; a rod on the outer circle tumbles end over end in the plane of shear. The flow never moves a rod from one orbit to another.

A viscosity the flow cannot decide

Spheres stirred into a liquid thicken it by a definite amount. Rods do not. A rod in a shear flow tumbles round a closed orbit, the flow never moves it to another, and the extra viscosity depends on which orbit it is on. The equations of slow flow permit a whole range of values and choose none of them. The smallest amount of noise chooses one, and it does not matter how small.

viscous · Suspension Squeezed past closing, the tube is held open by its own fluid. The channel's half-width along one wavelength of a travelling squeeze that would push an empty tube's wall 1.3 half-widths inward — past the centreline — and the wall the squeeze and the fluid's pressure make together, for three compliances. The empty squeeze would overlap the centreline across a sixth of the wavelength; with fluid in the tube, the pressure that builds ahead of the narrowest point pushes the wall back, and the gap stays open at a hundredth to a tenth of the half-width.

A squeezed tube is held open by its own fluid

A peristaltic pump with a prescribed wall wave gets better the more its wave closes the channel, and at closure it becomes a piston. A real one squeezes an elastic wall and lets the fluid push back. Then the channel never closes: the pressure ahead of the narrowest point holds a gap open that grows as the square root of the wall's give, squeezing harder past closure pumps less, and the pump behaves as a displacement pump until a pressure of about one over its compliance blows the throat open — with an efficiency that stops short of one by an amount that grows with the wall's give.

kinematics · Continuity Posts slip as one over the root of their fraction. The slip length of a surface of posts, over the period of their square array, against the fraction of the surface that is solid, beside Philip's stripes along and across and the dilute limit in which each post is a lone disc dragged edgewise, (3/16)√(π/φ). At a hundredth solid the posts slip 2.87 periods against the stripes' 1.32; at a tenth 0.597 against 0.591, nearly equal; at a half 0.0663 against 0.11 along the stripes and 0.0552 across them.

A post holds liquid back by its radius, a stripe by its length

A surface of no-slip posts standing in a gas-filled texture lets liquid slip over it, and the slip length grows as one over the square root of the solid fraction, where a surface of stripes grows only as its logarithm. The reason is the oldest contrast in slow flow: a disc dragged through a viscous liquid has a drag proportional to its radius, which is Stokes' law, and a line has no finite drag at all, which is Stokes' paradox. But sparse posts beat stripes only while they are sparse.

kinematics · Boundary conditions The paint pushes a scraper off the wall, and roughly as one over the square of the angle it is held at. The force the fluid exerts on a still blade at angle α to a wall sliding into the corner, per unit span over μU ln(R/ε): its component pushing the blade away from the wall and the size of its component dragging it along with the wall, towards the apex. At 10° they are 196 and 22.9; at 45°, 8.56 and 4.88; at 90°, 1.36 and 2.14; at 150°, 0.0757 and 0.924.

A scraper held flat is pushed off the wall it scrapes

A corner stirred from far away fills with an endless sequence of eddies. Drive the corner at the corner instead — let one of its walls slide under a still blade, as paint slides under a scraper — and the eddies vanish: every streamline turns once, and the stress rises into the corner without limit. G. I. Taylor solved it in 1962. The paint pushes the blade away from the wall with a force that grows as one over the square of the blade's angle, so a blade held flat rides up on what it was meant to remove, and the force is finite only because something too small to appear in the problem ends the corner.

viscous · Corner Pressed into their grooves, the menisci cost a striped surface at most a quarter of its slip before it floods. The slip length along the stripes as a share of the flat meniscus's, against the liquid's pressure over the gas's as aΔp/γ, for gas fractions of 0.5, 0.8 and 0.95; the groove floods when the arc meets a vertical wall at its advancing angle — 110°, 120° and 150° at pressures 0.342, 0.5 and 0.866. 0.5: 0.93, 0.903 and 0.84 kept at those floods; 0.8: 0.913, 0.879 and 0.804 kept at those floods; 0.95: 0.888, 0.845 and 0.752 kept at those floods.

A bowed meniscus keeps most of its slip until the groove floods

The slip lengths of a striped superhydrophobic surface are computed with flat gas surfaces. Press the liquid against the texture and every meniscus bows into its groove as an arc pinned at the solid's edges, and the slip falls. It falls by less than the obvious worry says: at the pressure where a groove wall advancing at 120° lets the liquid in, a surface four-fifths gas still keeps 88 per cent of its slip, and even at a 150° wall's flood three-quarters remains. A striped surface does not lose its slip gradually under pressure. It keeps most of it, and then loses all of it when the groove floods.

kinematics · Boundary conditions

Two spheres settling at a slant keep their slant for ever, and three do not

Two equal spheres settling through a viscous liquid fall faster together than either alone — half as fast again if they touch in line, and still five per cent faster thirty radii apart. Slanted, the pair drifts sideways as it falls, by up to three and a half degrees, and keeps the slant, the separation and the drift for as long as it falls: the two spheres always move with exactly the same velocity. Release a third and the shape is lost at once, the middle sphere drawing ahead and the outer two closing in behind it. What a pair keeps and a trio does not is a statement about symmetry, and reciprocity is half of it.

viscous · Reciprocity

A larger sphere overtakes its neighbour and leaves on the line it came in on

Two equal spheres settling together never change their shape. Make one of them two per cent larger and the pair becomes an encounter: the larger sphere sinks past the smaller round a path that bulges out and comes back, slowed sixteenfold at contact but never stopped, and it leaves at exactly the offset it arrived with. The smaller sphere swings seven radii sideways while the larger is above it and gives every radius back while the larger is below. In Stokes flow, meeting a neighbour displaces nothing — unless the spheres touch, and a hundredth of a radius of roughness is enough to make every touching path leave on the same line.

viscous · Reciprocity

A pressed blade floats on its land and leaves half the gap behind

A scraper or a doctor blade is not held at a gap; it is pressed on with a load, and it rises until the liquid it lets through carries that load. Without a flat land under its edge the liquid can carry it only through the corner's logarithm, so the gap falls exponentially with the load, and a blade steeper than about forty-four degrees cannot float at a working load at all — its edge is in contact. Give it a land a tenth of a millimetre long and the film becomes half the gap, falls as one over the load, and is a quarter of a micrometre at sixty degrees. The land is also why a blade's film grows as its edge wears.

viscous · Corner

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Model limitStokes flowDissipationBoundary conditionDragThe no-slip conditionReversibilityReynolds numberViscosityDimensionlessEfficiencyLubrication

All concepts