Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

The no-slip condition — where it appears

The condition that fluid in contact with a solid surface moves with it, tangentially as well as normally. It is the one condition an inviscid fluid may not be told, and everything a boundary layer does follows from it.

Named by 13 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Flow past a cylinder at Re 40. A real fluid past a circular cylinder. At low Reynolds number the flow closes up behind the body much as the ideal theory says; as it rises the flow separates and a region of reversed flow appears behind, which is where drag comes from.

Everything happens in a layer you cannot see

Air has so little viscosity that ignoring it works almost everywhere. Almost everywhere leaves out a film next to the surface, perhaps a millimetre thick, and that film decides drag, stall and whether an aircraft flies at all.

viscous · Boundary layer Stokes' theorem on a solved wake at Re 40. A rectangle drawn in a viscous flow that was solved on a grid. The circulation round its boundary is computed by walking the four sides and adding up the velocity along them; the vorticity inside it is computed by adding up the stored vorticity cell by cell. The two computations share no sample point and the theorem says they must agree.

Circulation is vorticity, added up

One of these two quantities is measured by walking round a loop and one by summing over the area inside it, and a theorem says they are the same number. That reconciles the site's most confusable pair — and explains how a flow with circulation can have no spin in it anywhere.

kinematics · Vorticity One more condition, and the price of it. The model problem ε u″ + u′ = 0 with a condition at each end, at three values of ε. The outer solution is the flat line at one — that is the whole of the answer when ε is zero, and it is a first-order equation that can meet one condition, so it meets the one at the far end and misses the one at the wall by the whole range. Restoring ε restores the second condition and pays for it with a layer of thickness ε, inside which the gradient is of order 1/ε. The product of those two — which is what a stress is — does not depend on ε at all: it is 1.0000 at every value tried, to nine decimal places. Drag does not vanish as viscosity does. It converges.

How many things a flow must be told

The equations of motion do not have one answer. They have as many as the conditions on the edge allow, and the number of those is decided by the order of the equation — which is why viscosity does not make the same problem harder, it makes a different problem.

kinematics · Boundary conditions 20.45 MPa out of a film 25 µm thick. The pressure along a tapered pad, from the closed-form solution of Reynolds' equation, with the same equation's tridiagonal grid solve drawn over it as points. The peak is 20.45 MPa — enough to yield mild steel — and it sits at 69 per cent of the way along rather than in the middle, because the pressure gradient vanishes where the film equals the harmonic mean of its two ends and the harmonic mean is biased towards the thinner one. The pad's own shape is drawn along the top, to a vertical scale of its own. Nothing pumps this oil: the runner drags it into a narrowing gap and the gap does the rest.

Nothing but the shape of the gap

A machine that holds a steel shaft off its bearing with a film of oil twenty-five microns thick has no pump in it, and the pressure it generates would yield mild steel. The mechanism is not the oil and not the speed; it is that the gap narrows.

viscous · Lubrication The wall makes vorticity at a rate with no viscosity in it. At a stationary wall the momentum equation collapses to ν ∂²u/∂y² = (1/ρ) ∂p/∂x, and the left-hand side is the diffusive flux of vorticity out of the surface. So the pressure gradient along the wall is the vorticity source, and the viscosity that made the no-slip condition necessary has cancelled out of what the condition produces. The curve is that flux across the Falkner–Skan family, computed from profiles solved by shooting and differenced at the wall; the straight line is the pressure gradient each of those flows has. They agree to 2.3e-14. At zero pressure gradient the flux is exactly zero: a flat plate creates no vorticity at all after its leading edge, and everything in its layer arrived from there.

Where vorticity comes from

Every scrap of vorticity in a flow past a body entered through its surface, and the rate at which it enters contains no viscosity at all — it is the pressure gradient along the wall. A flat plate makes none, and a closed body makes exactly as much of each sign.

kinematics · Vorticity 45° of corner, and an infinite number of eddies in it. The creeping flow in a corner of 45 degrees, drawn from Moffatt's similarity solution. Each eddy turns the opposite way to its neighbours and is 3.17 times smaller and 1.6e+3 times weaker than the one outside it. The contour levels are rescaled inside each eddy, because they differ in strength by three orders of magnitude per step and a single set of levels would show the first and nothing else — which is itself the reason nobody has seen the third. The dividing lines between eddies are drawn where the stream function changes sign, and the dots are the centres, both found from the solved field.

The eddies nobody stirs

A slow flow past the mouth of a sharp corner does not simply fail to get in. The corner fills with an infinite sequence of counter-rotating eddies, each about three times smaller and sixteen hundred times weaker than the last, and the whole structure is decided by one complex number.

viscous · Corner The air a wing carries along, and how little of it there is. The Blasius profile, in the wing's frame, with the free stream at one. No slip says the air at the surface is at rest relative to the surface, which in the ground's frame means it is moving with the wing — but only exactly at the wall. The deficit, integrated across the layer, is the displacement thickness: at a Reynolds number of 1e+6 and a metre of chord it is 1.72 millimetres of air moving at flight speed, which is the whole of what is 'carried'. The step drawn on the axis is that same deficit as a solid slab. A wing does not drag a blanket of air with it; it leaves a boundary layer behind it, and the layer is made of air that keeps being replaced.

The air a wing does not carry

No slip says the air touching a surface moves with it, and the usual reading is that a wing drags a blanket of air along. The blanket is 1.7 millimetres thick per metre of chord, it is different air every instant, and the drag it costs falls as it gets thicker.

misconceptions · The no-slip condition One number instead of a porous medium. The velocity through the bottom of a channel whose lower wall is a porous block of permeability 1e-4. Inside the block the flow decays over the pore scale √K = 1.0e-2 to Darcy's seepage velocity; above it the channel profile arrives at the interface with a slip velocity rather than at rest. A channel told nothing but u = √K du/dy at a flat wall reproduces that profile to 0.058 per cent of the flow rate, against 3.03 per cent for a wall told to hold the fluid still. The grid solve of the coupled problem agrees with the closed form to 0.0077 per cent.

A wall that is not quite there

A porous surface has structure on every scale below the pore, and no calculation resolves it. The whole of it can be replaced by one length — the square root of the permeability — and the replacement is exact to first order, with what it leaves out identifiable as the flow the wall itself carries.

kinematics · Boundary conditions The jet divides 75% to 25%. A jet striking a plate at 60 degrees. Both sheets leave at the jet's own speed, because their surfaces are at ambient pressure and Bernoulli allows nothing else, and the plate can exert no force along itself because the fluid has no viscosity. Momentum along the plate then fixes the split at (1 + cos β)/2 = 0.7500, and the normal force at ṁV sin β = 0.8660. Nothing about the plate's material, size or roughness enters either.

What a jet cannot push sideways

A jet striking a plate divides in two, and how it divides is fixed by a single sentence — an inviscid fluid exerts no force along a surface. That one statement, plus mass, gives the split exactly — and the same sentence turns a flat plate into a bucket worth twice as much.

applied · Jet The same flow, from two different physics. Solid lines: the depth-averaged flow between two plates a small distance apart, with an obstacle standing between them. Dashed: the ideal-flow solution for the same obstacle. They are the same field to a part in ten billion, because averaging Stokes flow across a narrow gap gives a velocity that is the gradient of a harmonic potential. The cell has no inertia at all, which is the one hypothesis the ideal theory cannot do without.

The exact theory, drawn by viscosity

Two flat plates a millimetre apart, syrup between them, an obstacle in the gap. The Reynolds number is a hundredth, inertia is absent, and the streamline pattern is the potential flow past that obstacle — exactly, to a part in ten billion. The one hypothesis ideal flow cannot do without is the one this flow most conspicuously breaks.

inviscid · Hele shaw Slip follows the stripes more closely than the shear does. Plan views of a striped surface, with the stripes running across each panel, for a shear at 0°, 30°, 54.7° and 90° to them. The faint arrow is the direction of the shear; the dark one is the slip velocity it produces, whose component along the stripes is the along-stripe slip length times the shear and whose component across them is half that. The slip is turned towards the stripes by 0.0°, 13.9°, 19.5° and 0.0°. It is largest, 19.47°, for a shear at 54.74°, where tan θ = √2. A surface with a tensor for a boundary condition can push a flow sideways, which a scalar slip length never can.

Twice as slippery along as across

A surface of alternating gas and solid stripes lets a liquid slip, and a flow far above it sees one number in place of the pattern — but the number depends on which way the flow goes. Along the stripes it is Philip's logarithm; across them it is exactly half, for a reason that takes one substitution to show. And the logarithm means that the slip is bought by the pattern's period rather than by how much of it is gas.

kinematics · Boundary conditions A spun cylinder carries its whole circulation at once, and hides it until the vorticity has left. The circulation round circles of radius r about a cylinder of radius a started spinning at once, as a share of the circulation of its own surface, 2πa²Ω, against r/a on a logarithmic axis, at νt/a² = 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100. At the surface it is the whole of it from the first instant, because no slip makes the fluid there turn with the cylinder. Just outside, the spin-up has laid down an equal and opposite ring of vorticity, so the circulation round a larger circle is only what has diffused past it: at two radii 0.000, 0.035, 0.611, 0.936 and 0.993 of the surface's at the same five times. The circulation a Magnus rotor needs is in the fluid the moment it spins; the far field learns of it only as fast as the counter-vorticity moves out.

A wall puts in exactly its own speed

A wall sliding in its own plane makes vorticity at a rate equal to its acceleration, with no viscosity in the rate. So however a wall is started, the vorticity it has put into the fluid is its speed, to the last digit; a wall that stops takes all of it back and leaves the fluid moving; and a spinning cylinder carries its whole circulation from the first instant, hidden behind an equal and opposite ring until viscosity carries the ring away.

kinematics · Vorticity A force that depends on the molecular scale only through its logarithm. The force per unit length needed to move a 30° contact line of water at 1 mm/s, out to 1 mm, against the slip length on a logarithmic axis, from a picometre to a tenth of a millimetre. Each tenfold change in the slip length moves the force by the same fixed amount, so eight decades of the most uncertain length in the problem change the answer by a factor of about twenty — and at zero slip length the line keeps rising without end. The dashed curve takes the exact wedge's angle factor with a sharp cutoff; the solid one the thin-film wedge with Navier slip.

The drop a no-slip wall would never let spread

Liquid touching a solid moves with it, and nearly everywhere that is as close to exact as anything in fluid mechanics. At the edge of a spreading drop it cannot be: the stress in the corner rises as one over the distance from the edge, and the force needed to move the edge is infinite. Something slips over a nanometre, and because the answer depends on that length only through its logarithm, a drop spreads at almost the same rate whatever the something is.

misconceptions · The no-slip condition

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

ViscosityBoundary conditionBoundary layerCirculationCreeping flowKelvin's circulation theoremModel limitSlipVorticityWall shearConservationFree surface

All concepts