Vorticity — where it appears
Named by 56 essays across 9 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A layer with a kink in it
Rayleigh proved in 1880 that an inviscid shear flow cannot be unstable unless its velocity profile bends the other way somewhere. It is one line of algebra, it is necessary and not sufficient, and it ties instability to separation through the sign of a single derivative at the wall.
The wake that has to spin
A rotor that takes power out of the wind must apply a torque to it, and a torque applied to air is angular momentum left behind. The axial theory has nowhere to put that energy, so Betz's ceiling is unreachable at every finite tip-speed ratio — and the gap is computable.
Every wavelength at once
A vortex sheet of zero thickness is unstable at every wavelength, and the shorter the wavelength the faster it grows. The answer has no smallest scale in it, which is not a fact about fluids — it is the model reporting that it left something out.
Spin is not the same as going round
A whirlpool whose streamlines are perfect circles can have no rotation in it anywhere. A flow whose streamlines are dead straight and parallel can be rotating everywhere. Both statements are true, and getting them the wrong way round is the most expensive confusion in the subject.
The vortex a wing leaves behind
A wing at rest has no circulation. A wing in flight has a great deal. Circulation round a circuit of fluid particles cannot change, so the difference had to come from somewhere — and it did, as an equal and opposite vortex dropped on the runway.
Circulation is vorticity, added up
One of these two quantities is measured by walking round a loop and one by summing over the area inside it, and a theorem says they are the same number. That reconciles the site's most confusable pair — and explains how a flow with circulation can have no spin in it anywhere.
What a parcel does in the first instant
Drop a circle of dye into a flow and it becomes an ellipse. The velocity gradient that did it splits into a stretch and a spin in exactly one way, the split is not a convention, and one half of it is the reason a fluid has any stress in it at all.
The spin that feeds itself
Stretch a vortex tube and its spin rises in exact proportion, because the circulation round it cannot change and its area has fallen. Nothing in that argument sets a limit — and the one flow where the limit can be written down exactly puts it at a length of √(4ν/α).
Vortices move each other
A vortex alone in an infinite fluid sits exactly still, forever — its own field is antisymmetric about it and there is nothing at its centre to be carried by. Everything a vortex does, another vortex did, and two of them already exhaust what can be written down.
Where vorticity comes from
Every scrap of vorticity in a flow past a body entered through its surface, and the rate at which it enters contains no viscosity at all — it is the pressure gradient along the wall. A flat plate makes none, and a closed body makes exactly as much of each sign.
What survives being wound up
Draw a loop of marked fluid particles and let the flow carry it. It will be stretched, folded and wound into a spiral until nothing about its shape is recognisable, and the circulation round it will not have moved at all — provided three conditions hold, each of which can be broken on purpose.
The cascade that runs backwards
Three-dimensional turbulence carries energy from large scales to small ones and dissipates it. Take away one dimension and the term that does it vanishes identically, a second quantity becomes conserved, and two conservation laws between them force the energy to go the other way — up in scale, into ever larger vortices.
Work out of a change of swirl
The work a rotor does per unit mass is the blade speed times the change in swirl, and that is all of it — no blade shape, no pressure, no efficiency, no gas properties. It is the same equation for a pump, a compressor, a turbine and a fan, and it follows from angular momentum on a box with nothing assumed about the inside.
What viscosity cannot take away
Leave a vortex alone in a viscous fluid and every local measure of it falls — the peak spin, the peak velocity, the enstrophy. The circulation round a large loop does not move at all, ever, and the far field is identical to the line vortex it started as.
The picture belongs to whoever is watching
Photograph the flow past a cylinder from the tunnel and it has two stagnation points. Photograph the same flow from a frame moving with the air and it has none at all, and its surface speed is exactly the free stream at every angle. Both pictures are correct and no measurement distinguishes them.
Every flow is two flows
Any velocity field splits into a part carrying all of the divergence and a part carrying all of the vorticity. The theorem says so and does not say which split — the two halves can be moved between each other by anything harmonic, and on a bounded region that is an infinite family.
An oscillation with somewhere to go
Shake a fluid back and forth over a body and it develops a steady circulation that never reverses. The driving flow has no mean at all; the mean of its own nonlinear term does, and integrating that twice across the oscillatory layer gives a slip velocity of exactly three-quarters of U dU/dx over the frequency.
The price of a gradient
Viscosity does not charge for motion. It charges for the rate at which a parcel is being deformed, and a fluid in solid-body rotation at any speed whatever destroys nothing at all. What is charged for is a sum of squares, which is why the bill can be computed twice.
Longer, with nothing pulling it
Two flows with exactly the same rate of strain. In one a line of fluid grows by a factor of 148 in five time units; in the other it grows by 10. Turn the straining axes faster than the strain rate and no line grows at all, however hard the fluid is being strained.
Four Bernoullis and one name
"Bernoulli's equation" names at least four statements with four different constants, three domains of validity and one shared reputation for being misapplied. A single sheared stream separates the first three: its total pressure is constant along every streamline, varies by three dynamic heads across them, and its static pressure never moves at all.
Where a vortex stops
Four criteria decide where a vortex ends, and in two dimensions three of them are the same criterion. The fourth is a knob. And the one that is not a knob is not objective: a co-rotating pair of vortices occupies four per cent of a window to one observer and more than half of it to another.
The spin a shock leaves behind
A curved shock gives every streamline a different entropy rise and the same stagnation enthalpy. Crocco's theorem then forces vorticity into a flow with no viscosity anywhere — and it scales as the inverse of the shock's radius of curvature, exactly, so a straight shock makes none.
Turbulent some of the time
At the edge of a jet or a wake a probe is inside turbulent fluid for part of the time and in perfectly smooth flow for the rest, and an ordinary time average mixes the two. Most of the fluctuation it records there is not turbulence at all — it is the switching between two states, and it peaks where the switching is most even rather than where the turbulence is strongest.
Inviscid does not mean irrotational
Dropping viscosity gives Euler's equations. Assuming nothing is spinning gives Laplace's — one scalar, linear, unique. The second step is a separate hypothesis about the flow's history, and a flow that fails it is still an inviscid flow with exact solutions of its own.
The one rotational solution anybody can write down
A sphere of spinning fluid travelling steadily through fluid at rest, with no body anywhere in it — the boundary is a streamline and nothing else. It is exact, it is two lines long, and the reason it is the famous one turns out to be the reason it is the only one a real fluid can settle into.
Steady, three-dimensional, and mixing anyway
A steady flow that solves the Euler equations exactly, with its vorticity equal to its velocity to six parts in ten thousand million — and one of its streamlines wanders through a sixth of the box while another, started nearby, lies on a curve for ever.
The vorticity nothing decides
A streamline that comes from upstream carries its vorticity with it. A closed one comes from nowhere, so nothing determines what it carries — the ambiguity is not one number per body but a whole function. What closes it is a limit, and setting the viscosity to zero gives a different answer from letting it go to zero.
The knot a flow cannot untie
Ideal flow conserves energy, circulation and impulse, and all three are what they look like. It conserves a fourth quantity that is not: a volume integral of the velocity dotted into the vorticity, whose value counts how many times the vortex lines are linked through one another.
The number that cannot break a drop
The capillary number sets the stress that stretches a drop against the stress that holds it round, and it predicts the deformation beautifully. It cannot predict the breakup, because above a viscosity ratio of about four a drop in simple shear cannot be broken at any shear rate — and the theory that says the ratio hardly matters is the same theory that gets the deformation right.
The shape a vortex keeps
Outside a circular patch of uniform vorticity the flow is exactly the point vortex's — not nearly, exactly — so replacing one by the other looks free. It is not. The patch has a shape, the shape has a rotation rate of its own, and there is a strain above which no shape exists at all.
Equal on average, and nothing else
The rate at which a fluid turns motion into heat can be written two ways, and every textbook says the two are equivalent. Their averages are equal to fourteen decimal places. Point by point they are uncorrelated, and their maxima are in different places.
Two kinds is a plane flow's privilege
A plane incompressible flow has a saddle or a centre and nothing else, and the proof is one line about a trace. The same line in three dimensions constrains three numbers instead of two, which is far less, and what it leaves is four kinds of point separated by a curve — with the one a plane cannot have being the structure the whole of turbulence is made from.
The window every vector is averaged over
Particle image velocimetry is the one flow-visualisation technique that reports the velocity itself, and it still applies an operator: every vector is an average over an interrogation window. A window is a filter with a transfer function, and it makes a vortex slower and fatter, a thin shear layer exactly as thick as the window, and some features smaller than the window point the wrong way.
The vorticity a clean surface cannot refuse
A clean bubble's surface cannot hold a shear stress, and it is easy to conclude that it makes no vorticity. On a curved surface it must carry exactly 2κu — three times the speed over the radius at a sphere's equator, whatever the Reynolds number. That is so much weaker than a rigid wall's that the flow stays irrotational to leading order, and the bubble's drag is the dissipation of that irrotational flow: 48/Re, three to ten times below a rigid sphere's.
The wall the fluid is listening to
Water two millimetres above a moving wall is responding to what the wall did two thirds of a second ago — most likely. Half of its response is older than four and a half seconds, a tenth is older than two minutes, and the average age of what it is responding to does not exist at all.
The lowest pressure is on the body
In an ideal flow the minimum pressure is always on a surface — not usually, not for the shapes people draw, always. The proof is an identity about the velocity gradient, and the identity says exactly which flows are exempt.
A wall puts in exactly its own speed
A wall sliding in its own plane makes vorticity at a rate equal to its acceleration, with no viscosity in the rate. So however a wall is started, the vorticity it has put into the fluid is its speed, to the last digit; a wall that stops takes all of it back and leaves the fluid moving; and a spinning cylinder carries its whole circulation from the first instant, hidden behind an equal and opposite ring until viscosity carries the ring away.
The sign a stagnation point carries in space
In three dimensions a stagnation point's index is the sign of one determinant, and that determinant is minus the R of the invariant diagram — so the diagram's left and right halves are the two indices. An exact Euler flow in a periodic box has eight such points, four of each sign, never a spiral among them, and they can only disappear in pairs that meet on the one line where the sign is allowed to change.
The drift that turns a current into rolls
A current carrying a Stokes drift feels a force the drift makes out of the current's own vorticity, and under a wind that force is unstable. It turns the surface layer into rolls lined up downwind, with windrows where they sink. The rolls need both the current's shear and the drift's; their growth rate sees only the product; and the split between the two decides which motion gets the energy.
The theory with no memory in it
Laplace's equation has no time in it, so an ideal flow's response to a body being jerked into motion is instantaneous and complete. Its indicial kernel is a spike and nothing afterwards. Beside it sit the two kernels that are not, and the comparison says which ingredient every memory in this collection came in through.
Past three, an ellipse is a shear layer
Kirchhoff's elliptical vortex turns for ever without changing shape, and Love showed in 1893 that it stops being stable at an aspect ratio of exactly three. Computed, that threshold turns out to be the first of a sequence — a new way of coming apart every one and a half aspect ratios — and the sequence ends somewhere recognisable. A long enough ellipse is a strip of vorticity, and it comes apart the way a shear layer does, at a rate Rayleigh found for the strip.
A cascade that arrives as stripes
Two-dimensional turbulence sends its energy upward in scale and, on a plane, piles it into a pair of vortices filling the box. On a rotating planet one extra term in the vorticity equation blocks that in every direction but one, and what arrives at the large scales is not a vortex at all but a set of bands.
An equilibrium a three-dimensional flow cannot have
The condensate an inverse cascade ends in is treated as what is left over when the energy has nowhere further to go. It is not a remainder. A two-dimensional fluid's phase space is its own region and therefore has finite volume, so its entropy has a maximum, its temperature changes sign, and the clustered state above that point is an equilibrium.
A gradient left to itself
Follow a parcel's velocity gradient with nothing acting on it but its own square and the part of the pressure a single parcel can know about. Every starting gradient but a set of measure zero reaches infinity in a finite time, and it gets there as a sheet with its spin lying in the sheet.
A flat flame is unstable at every size
A flame expands the gas it burns, and the expansion pushes back on the fresh gas ahead. Where the flame bulges forward the fresh gas slows, so the bulge burns further forward; where it lags, the gas speeds up and it falls further back. Every wrinkle grows, the shorter ones faster, and what finally gives a real flame a size is how its burning speed responds to its own curvature.
Every snapshot says vortex, and every particle leaves
There is a flow in which the velocity gradient has complex eigenvalues at every point and every instant — a vortex by every criterion that reads a snapshot, in the frame the flow is measured in — and in which every fluid particle is flung away exponentially. The snapshot is not wrong about the gradient. It is wrong about the fluid, and it is wrong exactly when the strain's axes turn.
A vortex is a waveguide
A spinning core is stiff in a way still fluid is not, and it carries waves along its length: an infinite family of them for every pattern round its axis, travelling at up to 0.83 of the swirl speed at its edge. The slowest is a helical bend that turns against the flow, and it is the wave every model of a bending vortex has been borrowing without saying so.
The streamfunction says which relaxed state
Decaying two-dimensional turbulence ends in a large pair of vortices, and three theories say what that pair should look like: a sinh relation between vorticity and streamfunction, a tanh, or a straight line. Their scatter plots differ only in curvature, and a real flow's scatter hides curvature. Solve the three states in the same periodic box, at the same energy and enstrophy, and a statistic that separates them turns out to be one nobody looks at: the flatness of the streamfunction, which sits above the straight line's value for every sinh state and below it for every tanh state, and does not move when unrelaxed small eddies are added.
The pressure a parcel remembers keeps it finite
The restricted Euler equation follows a parcel's velocity gradient with the pressure's shape thrown away, and every gradient it follows blows up. Give the parcel back a pressure that remembers how its neighbourhood was deformed over the last Kolmogorov time — nothing more — and no gradient blows up at all. The ensemble settles into the teardrop measured in turbulence, its vorticity lines up with the middle strain axis, and its intermittency grows as the memory shortens. What the memory cannot do is keep the one identity homogeneity demands, and that miss says where the rest of the pressure lives.
A parcel goes straight while the streamlines curve
In a steady flow every parcel accelerates while the picture never changes. The opposite also happens: a flow whose picture changes all the time while no parcel accelerates at all, because the local and convective halves of the acceleration cancel exactly. Such a flow has no pressure gradient anywhere, and that is a severe demand. An incompressible flow can meet it only as a pure shear at every point; a cloud that can compress meets it freely and pays later, when its straight paths cross in a caustic.
Decaying flows end on the sinh side
Three theories predict the state a decaying two-dimensional flow relaxes to, and the streamfunction's flatness tells them apart: above 9/4 for the point-vortex theory's sinh, below for the two-level theory's tanh. Run the decay from three kinds of start and every run ends above 9/4 — including the one begun as two-level patches, the case the tanh theory was built for. Four of six land on the sinh branch itself; the other two are sinh-like without being sinh.
A strained vortex loses its ring at the limit of what it holds
A uniform patch of vorticity survives a strain up to 0.150 of its vorticity and no further. A real vortex is not uniform: its vorticity falls off outward, and in a strain its weak outer layers are drawn off while its core survives. The obvious way to predict how much survives is to apply the uniform limit layer by layer, each layer to its own vorticity. It is wrong by up to a factor of three. Built from a core inside a ring and followed by contour dynamics, the ring is stripped not at the limit of its own vorticity but at the limit of all the vorticity inside its edge, and a little after it.
A swept wall makes vorticity along its isobars, not across its flow
A still wall in a pressure gradient puts vorticity into the fluid at a rate set by the gradient, and the source is a vector: it lies in the wall, along the isobars. On an unswept body the isobars run across the flow and so does the vorticity, which is the ordinary boundary layer. On a swept one the isobars run along the span and the flow does not, so part of every new vortex line points along the flow — half of it, over the accelerating front of a cylinder swept 35°. That part is where a swept wing's crossflow comes from.
A nose at incidence makes its vorticity along the flow
A wall makes vorticity along its isobars, and on a swept wing that sends part of it along the flow. A fuselage at a few degrees of incidence has no sweep anywhere, and still most of the vorticity its wall makes points along the flow — a fifth for a body twice as long as it is wide, four-fifths for one eight times — because at incidence its pressure varies round the body faster than along it. A sphere, at any incidence, makes none. The lee vortices begin at the wall.
An edge no observer can move still depends on what it is averaged against
The Q-criterion puts a co-rotating vortex pair in four per cent of a window for one observer and in more than half of it for another. The cure is to average, along each fluid path, how far the vorticity departs from its mean — a number no observer's rotation can change — and take the outermost convex level of it round each core. Computed, it works: both observers find two discs of radius 1.00, twice the core radius, and no fluid inside them strays from its core in an orbit. But the edge has a setting of its own. The mean must be taken over some region, and as that region grows from a radius of 4 to 20 the edge moves from 0.90 to 1.13.
The shock layer is Hill's vortex, and it heats the nose a tenth harder than Newton says
Behind a strong bow shock the gas is squeezed six-fold or more and turned round the nose in a thin layer, and if its density is taken as constant there the layer has an exact solution: the same family of rotational flows as Hill's spherical vortex, fitted to the shock's three conditions. It stands off further than a mass balance says, and its gas accelerates away from the stagnation point a fifth faster than Newton's pressure law implies. Since a nose's heating goes as the square root of that acceleration, the layer heats the nose about ten per cent harder than the estimate every first calculation of re-entry uses.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Model limitCirculationStrain rateIrrotationalBoundary layerMeasurementConservationKelvin's circulation theoremVelocity gradientBoundary conditionExact solutionPotential flow