Dissipation — where it appears
Named by 61 essays across 6 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A loss with no viscosity in it
Where a pipe suddenly widens, energy is destroyed. The amount is exact, it has been known since 1766, and the derivation never mentions viscosity, Reynolds number or roughness — because momentum does not care where the energy went, only that it left.
The ladder that never closes
Being six equations short is a problem with an obvious remedy — derive six more. The remedy works, produces an exact equation for the Reynolds stress, and leaves ten new unknowns behind. The gap does not narrow at any level, and the counting says why.
The shock in a river
Shallow water is a gas whose ratio of specific heats is two. The white water below a weir is a shock wave, momentum is conserved across it exactly, energy is not, and one direction is forbidden for the same reason an expansion shock is forbidden — which makes the analogy exact to first order and wrong at the second.
Where the energy goes
Energy enters a turbulent flow at the largest scale and leaves it at the smallest, and in between there is nothing for it to depend on but the rate at which it is passing through. Two quantities and one dimensional argument fix the shape of the spectrum, and the exponent is −5/3.
The bubble that hammers
A vapour cavity swept into higher pressure does not deflate. It collapses, in ninety microseconds for a millimetre bubble, and the model that describes the collapse predicts a wall speed that reaches the speed of sound in water at three per cent of the original radius — which is to say it predicts its own failure, and locates it.
The cascade that runs backwards
Three-dimensional turbulence carries energy from large scales to small ones and dissipates it. Take away one dimension and the term that does it vanishes identically, a second quantity becomes conserved, and two conservation laws between them force the energy to go the other way — up in scale, into ever larger vortices.
What viscosity cannot take away
Leave a vortex alone in a viscous fluid and every local measure of it falls — the peak spin, the peak velocity, the enstrophy. The circulation round a large loop does not move at all, ever, and the far field is identical to the line vortex it started as.
The wall that heats itself
A surface told nothing about its temperature does not settle at the air's. It settles most of the way to the stagnation temperature, and the heat flux is driven from that invented temperature rather than from the free stream's — so a wall hotter than the air can be being heated by it.
The sound that only leaves
A flow is a catastrophically bad radiator, and the reason is that it has no monopole and no dipole available to it. What is left is the eighth power of speed — and the equation is equally happy with sound converging on a jet, which is ruled out by a condition imposed at infinity.
The one exact result
Almost nothing in turbulence follows from the equations without a model in it. One thing does — Kolmogorov's four-fifths law, which fixes the third moment of the velocity differences at −(4/5)εr with no adjustable constant anywhere in it. The companion two-thirds law is not exact, and the 4.02 everybody quotes in it turns out to be a gamma function.
The price of a gradient
Viscosity does not charge for motion. It charges for the rate at which a parcel is being deformed, and a fluid in solid-body rotation at any speed whatever destroys nothing at all. What is charged for is a sum of squares, which is why the bill can be computed twice.
Where the heat of a drag is made
The power it takes to tow a body through a fluid becomes heat, all of it, eventually. None of the interesting words in that sentence are the first four. It is the "eventually" that decides how a wake behaves, how far a disturbance reaches, and why no box drawn round a body contains its own bill.
The limit that is not the value
Dissipation is viscosity times the square of a velocity gradient, so it ought to vanish as the viscosity does. It does not. The gradient rises by exactly the factor the viscosity falls by, the product stands still, and a fluid with no viscosity at all would dissipate nothing — which is why the limit and the value are different numbers.
The cheapest shape the walls allow
The parabola in a pipe is usually presented as what the equations give. It is better understood the other way round — of every profile that could carry that flow between those walls, it is the one that destroys the least energy, and the equations give it for that reason.
The last of the oil
A wet plate on a table is held down by nothing but the difficulty of getting air in underneath it. The force required to separate two flat surfaces with a film between them goes as the inverse cube of the gap, which means there is no finite energy that removes the last of the film and no finite time in which it drains away.
The film that heats itself
The oil in a bearing is not at the temperature of the metal around it. It is tens of kelvin hotter, the rise contains no length whatever, and whether the heating runs away or settles down depends on something that is not a property of the oil at all — whether the machine driving it holds the speed or holds the force.
What a plate takes with it
Pull a plate out of a bath and it comes out wet. How wet is not set by the plate, the bath or how much liquid there is, but by a competition in a region a fraction of a millimetre long that nobody looking at the plate can see — and the film goes as the two-thirds power of the speed, never as the first.
A viscosity that depends on the question
Blood, paint, molten polymer and drilling mud have no viscosity. They have a relation between stress and strain rate that is not proportional, so the ratio of the two depends on how hard they are being sheared — and an instrument that reports one number is reporting a property of itself.
What decay never forgets
Stir a box of fluid and stop. The turbulence decays, at a rate with no viscosity in it — so the rate cannot come from the fluid. It comes from an invariant of the very largest scales, fixed at the moment the stirring stops, and never revisited.
A viscosity made of particles
Stir rigid spheres into a liquid and the mixture is thicker, by five halves of the volume fraction. Einstein's coefficient is not an empirical constant — it is a dissipation calculation on one sphere — and doing it as an energy rather than as a stress shows that four-fifths of it comes from somewhere nobody mentions.
The range a real Reynolds number does not have
Kolmogorov's minus five thirds is a statement about a band of scales that has forgotten the forcing and does not feel the viscosity. Both conditions are about separation, and separation is exactly what a finite Reynolds number does not have much of.
The surface that moves with the flow
A clean gas bubble feels two-thirds of the drag a rigid sphere of the same size would, and the formula has no density in it anywhere. What buys the third is that the bubble's surface is free to move — and real bubbles in ordinary water do not get it, for a reason that is a millionth of a per cent of the water by mass.
The discontinuity that has a thickness
The jump conditions do not contain the viscosity, which is why they are exact. The thickness is entirely viscosity — 289 nanometres at Mach 1.5, 35 at Mach 5, against a mean free path of 64. At Mach five the continuum equations have produced a structure thinner than the distance between collisions.
The third thickness
A boundary layer has no edge, so every thickness quoted for it is an integral of the profile against some weight. Two of them are famous. The third answers a question the other two cannot — how much of the power spent towing a plate has actually become heat by the time the fluid leaves it — and the answer is 78.6 per cent.
A flux that runs both ways
The cascade is a statement about a mean. Kolmogorov's four-fifths law fixes an average and the constant flux through the inertial range is an average, and neither says anything about what the transfer is doing at any instant — which turns out to be running backwards a substantial part of the time.
The energy a vortex cannot have
A line vortex has infinite kinetic energy. Not a large amount — infinite, growing without limit as the logarithm of however far out the counting stops. And it is losing that energy at a rate that is finite, exactly known, and contains no cutoff at all.
Long enough to make a wake
A Reynolds number cannot ask whether an oscillating flow gets round a body before it turns and comes back, because it has no time in it. The Keulegan–Carpenter number can, and it decides which of Morison's two terms is the force. What it discards is the phase — and a peak force measurement cannot recover it.
The angle a junction chooses
Murray's law fixes the radii at a branching vessel and is where every account of it stops. The same minimisation fixes the angles completely — 74.93 degrees for a symmetric bifurcation, a right angle for a vanishing side branch — and it does so as a triangle of forces, with tensions proportional to the squares of the radii.
A swimmer that cannot go backwards
Taylor's waving sheet is the simplest self-propelled object in a viscous fluid, and its arithmetic contains a result that reads like a mistake — the work it does to travel a metre does not depend on how big its waves are. Doubling the amplitude quadruples both the speed and the power, and changes the bill for the journey by nothing at all.
The constant that makes a variance negative
Every engineering turbulence calculation in the world rests on one number, C-mu equals 0.09. It is not a property of turbulence. It is the assertion that a particular ratio is ten thirds, which is true in one flow — and eleven per cent above that flow the same closure reports a mean square below zero.
The viscosity nobody uses
A fluid has two viscosities. One resists a change of shape and appears in every viscous calculation; the other resists a change of volume, was set to zero by Stokes in 1845 in a paper that says he had no argument for doing so, and for carbon dioxide is fifteen hundred times larger than the one everybody quotes.
The jump does not ask what made it
Seven different dissipation mechanisms are made to smear the same shock. Their interiors are a factor of two and a third apart in thickness, their entropies overshoot the final value by between a quarter and a doubling, and the state they all arrive at agrees to seven parts in ten billion — because the end states are conservation and the interior is transport.
What a fluid takes out of a swing
The damping a body feels from the air around it is not Stokes' drag, and stops being it far earlier than anybody expects — a millimetre sphere in air is already forty-six per cent above the steady answer at one hertz. Past that the damping rises as the square root of the frequency, and the fluid it is fighting is a shell a fraction of its own size.
Equal on average, and nothing else
The rate at which a fluid turns motion into heat can be written two ways, and every textbook says the two are equivalent. Their averages are equal to fourteen decimal places. Point by point they are uncorrelated, and their maxima are in different places.
The scalar has its own cascade
Below the Kolmogorov scale there is no turbulence left, and a dye stirred into the flow goes on cascading anyway — on a spectrum whose exponent is minus one and whose amplitude contains no velocity spectrum at all. Resolving it costs the three-halves power of the Schmidt number, which for dye in water is a factor of ninety thousand.
What a mean profile cannot tell anybody
Two flows are built here with mean velocity profiles that agree to four parts in 10¹⁷. One of them carries momentum across the shear and dissipates forty per cent more energy; the other carries nothing. Everything that distinguishes them is second order in a disturbance the mean cannot see at all.
A dissipation that lags its production
Change the strain rate on a patch of turbulence and the production of energy follows instantly — it is the strain squared. The dissipation moves by less than one per cent, because it is the far end of a cascade that has not been told yet, and the two are out of balance by a factor of six for the next turnover.
A dissipation correlated across every scale
The dissipation is supposed to be the most local quantity in turbulence — a thing happening at the smallest eddies, everywhere and independently. A multiplicative cascade makes its logarithm correlated over a distance that is a ratio of logarithms, so two points a thousand smallest scales apart still agree a quarter of the time.
The vorticity a clean surface cannot refuse
A clean bubble's surface cannot hold a shear stress, and it is easy to conclude that it makes no vorticity. On a curved surface it must carry exactly 2κu — three times the speed over the radius at a sphere's equator, whatever the Reynolds number. That is so much weaker than a rigid wall's that the flow stays irrotational to leading order, and the bubble's drag is the dissipation of that irrotational flow: 48/Re, three to ten times below a rigid sphere's.
The profile Rayleigh cleared and viscosity did not
Flow between two plates has no inflection point, so without viscosity no wave on it can grow. With viscosity one does, above a Reynolds number of 5772. Taking the viscosity away again slows that wave and narrows the band it grows in, because the stress that feeds it is made by viscosity in the first place.
The constant that travels
Every decay law in the subject rests on the dissipation being some constant times u³ over a length. The constant is not one. Letting it move the way grid measurements say it moves changes the decay exponent by a quarter — and lands one of the answers five per cent from another that is entirely different physics.
The fraction that is really four thirds
Turbulence has two exact results, not one. The second is about a scalar carried by the flow, its constant is four thirds rather than four fifths, and the difference between the two fractions has nothing in it about turbulence at all — it is the price of writing a three-component object in terms of one component.
A relation with no turbulence in it
Isotropy and incompressibility alone fix the transverse structure function from the longitudinal one. Divide the relation through and it says the ratio of the two is one plus half the local slope — so the exponent everybody measures as 0.70 and the ratio everybody measures as 1.35 are one measurement, and a model spectrum with no intermittency in it produces both.
The pump that is better the more it squeezes
A waving sheet swims at a cost per metre with no amplitude in it. A waving wall pumping fluid is the same mechanism turned round, and its efficiency is nothing like that: it starts at nine-eighths of the amplitude ratio squared, is exactly 2 − √3 at half closure, and rises towards one as the wave closes the tube — where the pump stops being a wave and becomes a piston.
The decay inside the four-fifths law
The four-fifths law gives the dissipation of turbulence from one measured moment with no constant in it, which makes it the obvious way to measure how the dissipation coefficient travels during a decay. But the law is exact only in a limit, and a decaying flow is not in it. The decay itself takes a quarter off the moment at the Reynolds numbers grids reach — and the bias moves as the flow decays, by a sixth, in the direction opposite to the effect being looked for.
A ball that bounces in water and not in oil
A squeeze film cannot be closed with any finite energy, so nothing should ever touch anything. A sphere dropped into a tank nevertheless rebounds, and whether it does is decided by a number near ten that four materials and four decades of viscosity all agree on.
A flow pinned between two guesses
The minimum-dissipation principle says the true flow is the cheapest one the walls allow, so any guessed velocity carries too little. It has a twin that nobody teaches: any guessed stress in balance with the pressure carries too much, and it needs no wall condition at all. Between the two, the flow through a duct with no formula is pinned down to as many figures as anyone wants.
A lost steady state still holds the film
Push a self-heating oil film one per cent past the stress at which it can no longer settle and it does not run away at once. It warms to the temperature the vanished steady state would have had, sits there as if nothing were wrong, and only then goes — after a delay that grows as one over the square root of the overload, and during nearly all of which the load could still be taken back.
Forcing at the integral scale leaves the cascade alone
A decaying flow's third moment falls a quarter short of the four-fifths law at the Reynolds numbers a grid reaches. A flow forced at its largest scales, on the same spectrum at the same Reynolds number, falls short by three and a half per cent. The shortfall is not what a finite Reynolds number does to every flow; it is what the source does, and how fast it closes is set by how far the source reaches into the inertial range.
A squeezed tube is held open by its own fluid
A peristaltic pump with a prescribed wall wave gets better the more its wave closes the channel, and at closure it becomes a piston. A real one squeezes an elastic wall and lets the fluid push back. Then the channel never closes: the pressure ahead of the narrowest point holds a gap open that grows as the square root of the wall's give, squeezing harder past closure pumps less, and the pump behaves as a displacement pump until a pressure of about one over its compliance blows the throat open — with an efficiency that stops short of one by an amount that grows with the wall's give.
The heat of a squeeze leaves across the gap
Squeeze a film of air and it warms, and whether that heat reaches the walls in time decides whether the gas is compressed isothermally or adiabatically. The natural estimate has the heat leaving the way the gas does, along the disc, and puts the thermal crossing beside the viscous one. It leaves across the gap instead, a distance hundreds of times shorter, so the crossing sits decades away — and when a film does reach it, what it gains is not stiffness but a second band of loss.
The largest bulk viscosity is the first to expire
A bulk viscosity is not a separate property of a gas. It is the time a molecule's internal motion takes to catch up with a compression, multiplied by the pressure and by how much heat capacity lags, and read from below that time's frequency. So the coefficient that is largest is the one that stops being a coefficient soonest: carbon dioxide's fifteen-hundred-fold value is ten per cent wrong at 24 kHz, and on Mars it is two speeds of sound in the audible band.
A bulk viscosity holds a shock together until it splits
Carbon dioxide's bulk viscosity, fifteen hundred times its shear viscosity, is a vibrational relaxation seen from below its frequency, and a shock is where that description is tested hardest. Carried through a steady shock, the relaxation reproduces the coefficient exactly for the weakest shocks. At a pressure rise of nine and a half per cent the shock outruns the frozen sound speed and splits into a jump and a tail, and the coefficient then draws a shock that does not exist.
The summit forgets the forcing before the dissipation does
A flow forced at its largest scales carries the four-fifths law closer to exact than a decaying one. Switch the forcing off and the third moment has to pass from one value to the other. It does not wait for the cascade to drain: half the forced summit is gone in a fifth of an eddy turnover, while the dissipation has hardly moved, and the largest separations overshoot the decaying value before they settle on it.
The gas sets a squeeze film's loss, not its stiffness
A squeeze-film levitator wastes part of every cycle as heat that crosses the gap, and the gas and its pressure decide how much. Fill one levitator with six gases at one atmosphere and its stiffness hardly changes while its loss nearly doubles from helium to xenon. Raise the pressure and every gas stiffens towards a peak near ten atmospheres. Helium wastes least at any stiffness up to a hundred newtons; above that, only the heavy monatomic gases get there.
At higher orders the bottleneck hides intermittency
At second order the spectral bottleneck makes a field with no intermittency look intermittent. At higher orders it does the opposite. Every moment's local slope is steepened by the same finite-Reynolds-number excess, multiplied by half the order, while the intermittency correction pulls the other way. At a laboratory Reynolds number a fitted sixth-order exponent therefore shows less than two-thirds of the anomaly the field carries, and a fourth-order one less than a quarter.
A wandering forcing leaves the averaged four-fifths law alone
A forced flow's third moment loses half its excess within a fifth of an eddy time of the forcing stopping, so a forcing that wanders ought to drag a simulation's four-fifths ratio about with it. Instantaneously it does: the summit swings from 0.8 to 1.4. Averaged it does not — the third moment averaged and then divided stays at the steady forcing's 0.94 for every correlation time from a thirtieth of an eddy time to ten. The reason is that the balance is linear and stationarity fixes its source; what the forcing's memory changes is only the answer to a different question, the average of a ratio.
A scraper held flat is pushed off the wall it scrapes
A corner stirred from far away fills with an endless sequence of eddies. Drive the corner at the corner instead — let one of its walls slide under a still blade, as paint slides under a scraper — and the eddies vanish: every streamline turns once, and the stress rises into the corner without limit. G. I. Taylor solved it in 1962. The paint pushes the blade away from the wall with a force that grows as one over the square of the blade's angle, so a blade held flat rides up on what it was meant to remove, and the force is finite only because something too small to appear in the problem ends the corner.
Below separation a cylinder's drag is a Stokes layer, and KC stops deciding the force
Morison's equation splits the force on a cylinder in an oscillating flow into inertia and drag, and the Keulegan–Carpenter number says which dominates — once the flow separates and leaves a wake. Below that, nothing separates, and the drag term describes the thin oscillating boundary layer on the cylinder's surface. Its coefficient then grows without limit as the motion shrinks, as one over the Keulegan–Carpenter number, and that exactly cancels the number's power to decide anything: the drag's share of the force is fixed by the frequency parameter alone, a few per cent at most, until Honji's instability ends the regime.
The layer every airway restarts bends Murray's cube towards the turbulent pipe's
A laminar fork does not lose energy the way a turbulent one does, in a burst of mixing at the split. It loses it all the way down each daughter, because the boundary layer starts again at every flow divider and an airway a few diameters long ends before the layer has grown across it. Pedley measured that extra dissipation in 1970, and in the form he wrote it the radius cancels: it depends on the flow and the length alone. Price it into the cheapest tree and Murray's cube law gives way to a flow growing as the radius to the power twelve-fifths or thirteen-fifths, the band the turbulent pipe's exponent sits in, across the first eleven generations of a resting lung.
A levitator lifts by its amplitude, not its gas
A squeeze-film levitator holds its load up by the mean of a pressure that swings symmetrically about nothing, and the gas in the gap was expected to decide how much: a gas that cannot shed its heat of compression in time is stiffer, so it should lift more. Solved to every order in the amplitude, with the heat crossing the gap, it barely does. At a levitator's own thermal numbers every common gas lifts within a few per cent of the isothermal film while its losses differ several-fold, and even a gas far too slow to shed its heat lifts only a fifth more, because the walls quietly pump heat out of it and cool its middle.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Model limitViscosityMeasurementInertial rangeSpectrumReynolds numberTurbulenceCascadeConservationStructure functionBoundary conditionClosure