Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Inertial range — where it appears

The band of scales in a turbulent flow that is too small to feel the stirring and too large to feel the viscosity. Its width is three-quarters of the logarithm of the Reynolds number, so a laboratory flow has barely a decade of it.

Named by 9 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The inertial range, and the slope read back off it. The model energy spectrum at Re = 1e+6, with production rolling off below the integral scale and dissipation cutting it off above the Kolmogorov scale. The straight middle is the inertial range, and the number printed beside it is the slope least-squares fitted to the drawn points over the middle of that range — not the −5/3 that went in.

Where the energy goes

Energy enters a turbulent flow at the largest scale and leaves it at the smallest, and in between there is nothing for it to depend on but the rate at which it is passing through. Two quantities and one dimensional argument fix the shape of the spectrum, and the exponent is −5/3.

turbulence · Cascade One spectrum, two fields. Two one-dimensional fields built from the same amplitudes and different phases. Their energy spectra are identical to the last bit, their two-point correlations agree to 2e-15, their second-order structure functions are the same function — and no measurement of either kind can tell them apart. Everything that distinguishes them is in the phases, which is where the cascade lives.

The moment a spectrum cannot hold

A spectrum and a two-point correlation are the same object, transformed, so everything one of them records the other records too. Give a field the exact Kolmogorov amplitudes and independent phases and every second-order measurement comes out right — while the cascade, which lives in the phases, is not there at all.

turbulence · Spectrum The one exact law, and where viscosity takes it back. The two terms of the Kármán–Howarth relation against separation, measured in Kolmogorov lengths. The four-fifths term rises linearly with r and is the whole of the law at large separation; the viscous term, 6ν dS₂/dr, falls as r^(−1/3) and takes over below 5.64η. Nothing in the calculation was told what η is: the crossing is at the same multiple of it at every viscosity tried, which is what makes the dissipation scale the lower end of the inertial range rather than a separate assumption.

The one exact result

Almost nothing in turbulence follows from the equations without a model in it. One thing does — Kolmogorov's four-fifths law, which fixes the third moment of the velocity differences at −(4/5)εr with no adjustable constant anywhere in it. The companion two-thirds law is not exact, and the 4.02 everybody quotes in it turns out to be a gamma function.

turbulence · Structure function Two things moving by a million, and their product standing still. Viscosity, the squared velocity gradient at the dissipation scale, and their product, across six decades of Reynolds number at a fixed large-scale flow. The viscosity falls by a factor of 1e+6; the squared gradient rises by exactly the same factor, because η falls as Re^(−3/4) and u_η as Re^(−1/4); and the dissipation ν(u_η/η)² does not move at all. That is the dissipation anomaly stated as arithmetic: the limit of the dissipation as viscosity vanishes is not the value it takes when viscosity is zero.

The limit that is not the value

Dissipation is viscosity times the square of a velocity gradient, so it ought to vanish as the viscosity does. It does not. The gradient rises by exactly the factor the viscosity falls by, the product stands still, and a fluid with no viscosity at all would dissipate nothing — which is why the limit and the value are different numbers.

turbulence · Dissipation Model spectra at four Reynolds numbers, compensated. The spectrum multiplied by k^(5/3) and divided by eps^(2/3), so that a true inertial range is a horizontal line at the Kolmogorov constant. What a finite Reynolds number has instead is a single maximum: it reaches 1.4996 at the highest and 1.49 at the lowest, and the band over which it is flat to one per cent goes from a third of a decade to two.

The range a real Reynolds number does not have

Kolmogorov's minus five thirds is a statement about a band of scales that has forgotten the forcing and does not feel the viscosity. Both conditions are about separation, and separation is exactly what a finite Reynolds number does not have much of.

turbulence · Spectrum The scalar spectrum, with its two ranges. A model scalar spectrum at a Schmidt number of two thousand — dye in water. Below the Kolmogorov wavenumber it is Obukhov and Corrsin's five-thirds, inherited from the velocity; above it there is no turbulence left and the spectrum is Batchelor's minus one, which contains no velocity spectrum at all.

The scalar has its own cascade

Below the Kolmogorov scale there is no turbulence left, and a dye stirred into the flow goes on cascading anyway — on a spectrum whose exponent is minus one and whose amplitude contains no velocity spectrum at all. Resolving it costs the three-halves power of the Schmidt number, which for dye in water is a factor of ninety thousand.

turbulence · Mixing Four over the dimension, and three dimensions is where the three comes from. The constant in front of the exact law, against the number of dimensions the flow lives in. Both exact results — Yaglom's for a scalar and the velocity's law for the mixed third moment — have this same constant, because both come from the same statement: an isotropic radial flux in separation space whose divergence is a constant sink. Integrating that divergence gives 4Q r/d and nothing else. The four-thirds everybody quotes is four over three, and the three is the space rather than anything about turbulence. The dots are the quadrature, which agrees with the closed form to 2·10⁻⁹.

The fraction that is really four thirds

Turbulence has two exact results, not one. The second is about a scalar carried by the flow, its constant is four thirds rather than four fifths, and the difference between the two fractions has nothing in it about turbulence at all — it is the price of writing a three-component object in terms of one component.

turbulence · Structure function One curve from two to one, with four thirds somewhere in the middle. The ratio of the transverse second-order structure function to the longitudinal one, against separation, at three Reynolds numbers. Every value on every curve follows from the longitudinal function alone by a relation with no dynamics in it. It is exactly 2 where the field is smooth, exactly 1 beyond the correlation length, and it passes through four thirds on the way — but it passes through rather than resting there, and how nearly it rests is the whole of what a Reynolds number buys.

A relation with no turbulence in it

Isotropy and incompressibility alone fix the transverse structure function from the longitudinal one. Divide the relation through and it says the ratio of the two is one plus half the local slope — so the exponent everybody measures as 0.70 and the ratio everybody measures as 1.35 are one measurement, and a model spectrum with no intermittency in it produces both.

turbulence · Structure function The plateau everybody looks for is a summit, and a low one. −Dₗₗₗ/((4/5)εr) against separation in decaying turbulence at five Taylor-scale Reynolds numbers. None has a plateau at one. Each rises through the viscous range and turns over, peaking at 0.49, 0.63, 0.75, 0.85, 0.90 for Reλ = 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000. A measurement of ε that takes the largest value of this curve as four-fifths reads each of those shortfalls as a smaller dissipation.

The decay inside the four-fifths law

The four-fifths law gives the dissipation of turbulence from one measured moment with no constant in it, which makes it the obvious way to measure how the dissipation coefficient travels during a decay. But the law is exact only in a limit, and a decaying flow is not in it. The decay itself takes a quarter off the moment at the Reynolds numbers grids reach — and the bias moves as the flow decays, by a sixth, in the direction opposite to the effect being looked for.

turbulence · Decay

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

DissipationSpectrumStructure functionTurbulenceCascadeKolmogorov's theoryThe Kolmogorov scaleModel limitReynolds numberIntermittencyIsotropyMeasurement

All concepts