Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Four-fifths law — where it appears

Kolmogorov's exact result that the third moment of the longitudinal velocity difference is −(4/5) times the dissipation times the separation. It is the only statement in turbulence theory derived from the equations with no adjustable constant, and every intermittency model has to reproduce it.

Named by 7 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Four sets of scaling exponents, all of them exact at the third moment. zeta_p against p for K41, the beta-model, the log-normal model and She–Leveque. Every one of them passes through zeta_3 = 1 exactly, because the four-fifths law is a consequence of the equations and a model that missed it would be wrong about the one thing that is known. What they disagree about is every other moment.

The exponents that stop being thirds

Kolmogorov's 1941 theory says every moment of the velocity difference scales with the same exponent, p over three, so the distribution keeps its shape at every scale. It does not. The exponents fall below the line, by more the higher the moment, and what the departure measures is a dimension.

turbulence · Intermittency The mean flux, flat across the inertial shells and equal to the dissipation. The time-averaged transfer out of the first n shells, computed as the rate at which the nonlinearity changes their energy rather than from a remembered formula. It is constant to a tenth across the middle of the ladder and equal to the dissipation, which is the cascade — and it is an average.

A flux that runs both ways

The cascade is a statement about a mean. Kolmogorov's four-fifths law fixes an average and the constant flux through the inertial range is an average, and neither says anything about what the transfer is doing at any instant — which turns out to be running backwards a substantial part of the time.

turbulence · Cascade Four over the dimension, and three dimensions is where the three comes from. The constant in front of the exact law, against the number of dimensions the flow lives in. Both exact results — Yaglom's for a scalar and the velocity's law for the mixed third moment — have this same constant, because both come from the same statement: an isotropic radial flux in separation space whose divergence is a constant sink. Integrating that divergence gives 4Q r/d and nothing else. The four-thirds everybody quotes is four over three, and the three is the space rather than anything about turbulence. The dots are the quadrature, which agrees with the closed form to 2·10⁻⁹.

The fraction that is really four thirds

Turbulence has two exact results, not one. The second is about a scalar carried by the flow, its constant is four thirds rather than four fifths, and the difference between the two fractions has nothing in it about turbulence at all — it is the price of writing a three-component object in terms of one component.

turbulence · Structure function The plateau everybody looks for is a summit, and a low one. −Dₗₗₗ/((4/5)εr) against separation in decaying turbulence at five Taylor-scale Reynolds numbers. None has a plateau at one. Each rises through the viscous range and turns over, peaking at 0.49, 0.63, 0.75, 0.85, 0.90 for Reλ = 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000. A measurement of ε that takes the largest value of this curve as four-fifths reads each of those shortfalls as a smaller dissipation.

The decay inside the four-fifths law

The four-fifths law gives the dissipation of turbulence from one measured moment with no constant in it, which makes it the obvious way to measure how the dissipation coefficient travels during a decay. But the law is exact only in a limit, and a decaying flow is not in it. The decay itself takes a quarter off the moment at the Reynolds numbers grids reach — and the bias moves as the flow decays, by a sixth, in the direction opposite to the effect being looked for.

turbulence · Decay Forced at the integral scale, the third moment nearly reaches four-fifths. The Kármán–Howarth balance at a Taylor-scale Reynolds number of 200, on the same model spectrum, for a flow forced in a band at the spectrum's peak and for one decaying. Each term is divided by (4/5)εr and plotted against separation in Kolmogorov lengths. The viscous term is the same for both. The forcing term is negligible until the separation approaches the integral scale, and −Dₗₗₗ/((4/5)εr) for the forced flow peaks at 0.965 at 90 Kolmogorov lengths, where the decaying flow's peaks at 0.747 at 32.

Forcing at the integral scale leaves the cascade alone

A decaying flow's third moment falls a quarter short of the four-fifths law at the Reynolds numbers a grid reaches. A flow forced at its largest scales, on the same spectrum at the same Reynolds number, falls short by three and a half per cent. The shortfall is not what a finite Reynolds number does to every flow; it is what the source does, and how fast it closes is set by how far the source reaches into the inertial range.

turbulence · Decay Half the forced summit is gone in a fifth of an eddy time. The third moment of the velocity differences as a fraction of four-fifths εr, against separation in Kolmogorov lengths of the forced flow, at the instant the forcing is switched off and 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1 and 4 large-eddy times later. Forced, the curve peaks at 0.94 near 67 η. A tenth of an eddy time later the summit is 0.899, at a fifth 0.838, at a half 0.759, and after that it hardly moves: 0.742 at one and 0.72 at four, where the flow is simply decaying. The large separations fall first and farthest.

The summit forgets the forcing before the dissipation does

A flow forced at its largest scales carries the four-fifths law closer to exact than a decaying one. Switch the forcing off and the third moment has to pass from one value to the other. It does not wait for the cascade to drain: half the forced summit is gone in a fifth of an eddy turnover, while the dissipation has hardly moved, and the largest separations overshoot the decaying value before they settle on it.

turbulence · Decay However long its forcing remembers, a stationary flow's averaged four-fifths summit stays at 0.94. The summit of −Dₗₗₗ/((4/5)εr) computed from the time-averaged spectrum and source — the third moment averaged, then divided by the averaged dissipation — against the forcing's correlation time in large-eddy times, for a forcing amplitude whose logarithm wanders with standard deviation 0.5 and 1, over runs of 200 to 400 eddy times. The steady forcing's summit is 0.94; across correlation times from 0.03 to 10 eddy times and both spreads the averaged summit lies between 0.9371 and 0.9438, within its batch errors of the steady value.

A wandering forcing leaves the averaged four-fifths law alone

A forced flow's third moment loses half its excess within a fifth of an eddy time of the forcing stopping, so a forcing that wanders ought to drag a simulation's four-fifths ratio about with it. Instantaneously it does: the summit swings from 0.8 to 1.4. Averaged it does not — the third moment averaged and then divided stays at the steady forcing's 0.94 for every correlation time from a thirtieth of an eddy time to ten. The reason is that the balance is linear and stationarity fixes its source; what the forcing's memory changes is only the answer to a different question, the average of a ratio.

turbulence · Decay

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

DissipationStructure functionInertial rangeModel limitCascadeSpectrumClosureDecayAveragingEquilibriumIntermittencyReynolds number

All concepts