Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Cascade — where it appears

The passage of energy from the large scales of a turbulent flow to the small ones, at a rate set by the largest. It is a flux rather than a shape, so it is carried by the third moment of the velocity differences and is invisible to any spectrum.

Named by 12 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

80 per cent of the energy goes to the larger scale. One unit of energy is taken out of the middle wavenumber and shared between its two neighbours. Two conservation laws decide the split completely: the energy must add up, and so must the enstrophy, which weights each wavenumber by k². For (1, 2, 4) the answer is that 80.0 per cent of the energy goes up in scale and 80.0 per cent of the enstrophy goes down. There is no model of turbulence anywhere in that: it is two linear equations in two unknowns, and it is why a two-dimensional flow organises itself into large vortices while its gradients get finer.

The cascade that runs backwards

Three-dimensional turbulence carries energy from large scales to small ones and dissipates it. Take away one dimension and the term that does it vanishes identically, a second quantity becomes conserved, and two conservation laws between them force the energy to go the other way — up in scale, into ever larger vortices.

turbulence · Two-dimensional One spectrum, two fields. Two one-dimensional fields built from the same amplitudes and different phases. Their energy spectra are identical to the last bit, their two-point correlations agree to 2e-15, their second-order structure functions are the same function — and no measurement of either kind can tell them apart. Everything that distinguishes them is in the phases, which is where the cascade lives.

The moment a spectrum cannot hold

A spectrum and a two-point correlation are the same object, transformed, so everything one of them records the other records too. Give a field the exact Kolmogorov amplitudes and independent phases and every second-order measurement comes out right — while the cascade, which lives in the phases, is not there at all.

turbulence · Spectrum The one exact law, and where viscosity takes it back. The two terms of the Kármán–Howarth relation against separation, measured in Kolmogorov lengths. The four-fifths term rises linearly with r and is the whole of the law at large separation; the viscous term, 6ν dS₂/dr, falls as r^(−1/3) and takes over below 5.64η. Nothing in the calculation was told what η is: the crossing is at the same multiple of it at every viscosity tried, which is what makes the dissipation scale the lower end of the inertial range rather than a separate assumption.

The one exact result

Almost nothing in turbulence follows from the equations without a model in it. One thing does — Kolmogorov's four-fifths law, which fixes the third moment of the velocity differences at −(4/5)εr with no adjustable constant anywhere in it. The companion two-thirds law is not exact, and the 4.02 everybody quotes in it turns out to be a gamma function.

turbulence · Structure function Two things moving by a million, and their product standing still. Viscosity, the squared velocity gradient at the dissipation scale, and their product, across six decades of Reynolds number at a fixed large-scale flow. The viscosity falls by a factor of 1e+6; the squared gradient rises by exactly the same factor, because η falls as Re^(−3/4) and u_η as Re^(−1/4); and the dissipation ν(u_η/η)² does not move at all. That is the dissipation anomaly stated as arithmetic: the limit of the dissipation as viscosity vanishes is not the value it takes when viscosity is zero.

The limit that is not the value

Dissipation is viscosity times the square of a velocity gradient, so it ought to vanish as the viscosity does. It does not. The gradient rises by exactly the factor the viscosity falls by, the product stands still, and a fluid with no viscosity at all would dissipate nothing — which is why the limit and the value are different numbers.

turbulence · Dissipation Deviation: how far the flow leaves from the blade angle, against solidity. The angle between the outlet flow and the blade, for a row of flat plates at 30° stagger meeting a flow at 45°. An open row barely turns the flow at all and the deviation is nearly the whole of the intended turning; a tight row guides it to within a thousandth of a degree of the blade angle. Nothing about the blade changed between the two ends of this curve.

A row is not a set of aerofoils

An isolated aerofoil's incidence is measured from the free stream. A compressor blade's cannot be, because an infinite row of identical blades above and below it has a circulation that is part of its own free stream — and the velocity the theorem uses is a vector mean that exists nowhere in the machine.

circulation · Cascade The production jumps and the dissipation does not. Production and dissipation against time, through a step change in the strain rate. The production follows the strain immediately — it is the strain squared times an eddy viscosity — and the dissipation moves by less than one per cent at the instant of the step, because it is set by a cascade that has not been told yet.

A dissipation that lags its production

Change the strain rate on a patch of turbulence and the production of energy follows instantly — it is the strain squared. The dissipation moves by less than one per cent, because it is the far end of a cascade that has not been told yet, and the two are out of balance by a factor of six for the next turnover.

turbulence · Dissipation How far apart two points can be and still be correlated. The correlation between the logarithm of the dissipation at two points, against how far apart they are in units of the smallest scale, over four decades. It falls as a ratio of logarithms — so it is still a quarter at a thousand smallest scales, and reaches a half only at a hundred.

A dissipation correlated across every scale

The dissipation is supposed to be the most local quantity in turbulence — a thing happening at the smallest eddies, everywhere and independently. A multiplicative cascade makes its logarithm correlated over a distance that is a ratio of logarithms, so two points a thousand smallest scales apart still agree a quarter of the time.

turbulence · Intermittency What a downstream blade sees going past. The axial velocity a blade in the second row meets, over one revolution, as it passes through the wakes of thirty upstream blades. Each dip is one wake, and the blade meets all thirty of them every time it goes round.

A row that meets the row before it

A compressor blade is loaded and unloaded thirty times a revolution by geometry it does not have. The forcing sits at the blade count of the row in front of it and at multiples of that, and how far up the harmonics it reaches is decided by how far apart the two rows are.

circulation · Cascade Four over the dimension, and three dimensions is where the three comes from. The constant in front of the exact law, against the number of dimensions the flow lives in. Both exact results — Yaglom's for a scalar and the velocity's law for the mixed third moment — have this same constant, because both come from the same statement: an isotropic radial flux in separation space whose divergence is a constant sink. Integrating that divergence gives 4Q r/d and nothing else. The four-thirds everybody quotes is four over three, and the three is the space rather than anything about turbulence. The dots are the quadrature, which agrees with the closed form to 2·10⁻⁹.

The fraction that is really four thirds

Turbulence has two exact results, not one. The second is about a scalar carried by the flow, its constant is four thirds rather than four fifths, and the difference between the two fractions has nothing in it about turbulence at all — it is the price of writing a three-component object in terms of one component.

turbulence · Structure function Forced at the integral scale, the third moment nearly reaches four-fifths. The Kármán–Howarth balance at a Taylor-scale Reynolds number of 200, on the same model spectrum, for a flow forced in a band at the spectrum's peak and for one decaying. Each term is divided by (4/5)εr and plotted against separation in Kolmogorov lengths. The viscous term is the same for both. The forcing term is negligible until the separation approaches the integral scale, and −Dₗₗₗ/((4/5)εr) for the forced flow peaks at 0.965 at 90 Kolmogorov lengths, where the decaying flow's peaks at 0.747 at 32.

Forcing at the integral scale leaves the cascade alone

A decaying flow's third moment falls a quarter short of the four-fifths law at the Reynolds numbers a grid reaches. A flow forced at its largest scales, on the same spectrum at the same Reynolds number, falls short by three and a half per cent. The shortfall is not what a finite Reynolds number does to every flow; it is what the source does, and how fast it closes is set by how far the source reaches into the inertial range.

turbulence · Decay Half the forced summit is gone in a fifth of an eddy time. The third moment of the velocity differences as a fraction of four-fifths εr, against separation in Kolmogorov lengths of the forced flow, at the instant the forcing is switched off and 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1 and 4 large-eddy times later. Forced, the curve peaks at 0.94 near 67 η. A tenth of an eddy time later the summit is 0.899, at a fifth 0.838, at a half 0.759, and after that it hardly moves: 0.742 at one and 0.72 at four, where the flow is simply decaying. The large separations fall first and farthest.

The summit forgets the forcing before the dissipation does

A flow forced at its largest scales carries the four-fifths law closer to exact than a decaying one. Switch the forcing off and the third moment has to pass from one value to the other. It does not wait for the cascade to drain: half the forced summit is gone in a fifth of an eddy turnover, while the dissipation has hardly moved, and the largest separations overshoot the decaying value before they settle on it.

turbulence · Decay However long its forcing remembers, a stationary flow's averaged four-fifths summit stays at 0.94. The summit of −Dₗₗₗ/((4/5)εr) computed from the time-averaged spectrum and source — the third moment averaged, then divided by the averaged dissipation — against the forcing's correlation time in large-eddy times, for a forcing amplitude whose logarithm wanders with standard deviation 0.5 and 1, over runs of 200 to 400 eddy times. The steady forcing's summit is 0.94; across correlation times from 0.03 to 10 eddy times and both spreads the averaged summit lies between 0.9371 and 0.9438, within its batch errors of the steady value.

A wandering forcing leaves the averaged four-fifths law alone

A forced flow's third moment loses half its excess within a fifth of an eddy time of the forcing stopping, so a forcing that wanders ought to drag a simulation's four-fifths ratio about with it. Instantaneously it does: the summit swings from 0.8 to 1.4. Averaged it does not — the third moment averaged and then divided stays at the steady forcing's 0.94 for every correlation time from a thirtieth of an eddy time to ten. The reason is that the balance is linear and stationarity fixes its source; what the forcing's memory changes is only the answer to a different question, the average of a ratio.

turbulence · Decay

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

DissipationInertial rangeSpectrumStructure functionTurbulenceFour-fifths lawKolmogorov's theoryMemory kernelModel limitClosureConservationDimensionless

All concepts