Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Slip — where it appears

Relative motion between a fluid and the surface it touches, which an ordinary wall forbids. It is permitted as an effective condition over a structure too fine to resolve, and the length in that condition is what stands in for the structure.

Named by 15 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

One number instead of a porous medium. The velocity through the bottom of a channel whose lower wall is a porous block of permeability 1e-4. Inside the block the flow decays over the pore scale √K = 1.0e-2 to Darcy's seepage velocity; above it the channel profile arrives at the interface with a slip velocity rather than at rest. A channel told nothing but u = √K du/dy at a flat wall reproduces that profile to 0.058 per cent of the flow rate, against 3.03 per cent for a wall told to hold the fluid still. The grid solve of the coupled problem agrees with the closed form to 0.0077 per cent.

A wall that is not quite there

A porous surface has structure on every scale below the pore, and no calculation resolves it. The whole of it can be replaced by one length — the square root of the permeability — and the replacement is exact to first order, with what it leaves out identifiable as the flow the wall itself carries.

kinematics · Boundary conditions How wrong the ordinary answer already is. The error in a no-slip continuum calculation of the flow through a channel, against the Knudsen number, both logarithmic. The rule at Kn = 1 is where a molecule crosses the whole channel between collisions — the value the number is named for. The error is one per cent at Kn = 1/594, five per cent at 1/114 and ten at 1/54, so the continuum regime of the usual classification, which runs to Kn = 0.01, is a region in which the continuum answer is already six per cent out at its far end.

Where a fluid stops being one

The Knudsen number is the mean free path over the size of the thing, and at one a molecule crosses the whole channel between collisions. The continuum equations with a no-slip wall are already one per cent wrong at one part in five hundred and ninety-four, which is a factor nothing about the definition would suggest.

regimes · Knudsen An oscillation with no mean, and the steady flow it drives. The steady second-order velocity through a Stokes layer, in units of U U′/ω. The first-order flow averages to zero at every height; the average of its own nonlinear term does not, and the pale curve is that forcing. Integrating it twice across the layer, with no slip at the wall and no stress at the top, gives a steady velocity that rises through the layer and settles at -0.749998 — Rayleigh's −3/4, which was not put in anywhere. Beyond about five layer thicknesses nothing more happens, which is why the number is a boundary condition for the flow outside.

An oscillation with somewhere to go

Shake a fluid back and forth over a body and it develops a steady circulation that never reverses. The driving flow has no mean at all; the mean of its own nonlinear term does, and integrating that twice across the oscillatory layer gives a slip velocity of exactly three-quarters of U dU/dx over the frequency.

viscous · Streaming Slip follows the stripes more closely than the shear does. Plan views of a striped surface, with the stripes running across each panel, for a shear at 0°, 30°, 54.7° and 90° to them. The faint arrow is the direction of the shear; the dark one is the slip velocity it produces, whose component along the stripes is the along-stripe slip length times the shear and whose component across them is half that. The slip is turned towards the stripes by 0.0°, 13.9°, 19.5° and 0.0°. It is largest, 19.47°, for a shear at 54.74°, where tan θ = √2. A surface with a tensor for a boundary condition can push a flow sideways, which a scalar slip length never can.

Twice as slippery along as across

A surface of alternating gas and solid stripes lets a liquid slip, and a flow far above it sees one number in place of the pattern — but the number depends on which way the flow goes. Along the stripes it is Philip's logarithm; across them it is exactly half, for a reason that takes one substitution to show. And the logarithm means that the slip is bought by the pattern's period rather than by how much of it is gas.

kinematics · Boundary conditions The gas that does not stop at the wall. Channel flow profiles with and without slip, at a Knudsen number of a twentieth. The slipping profile does not reach zero at the wall: the gas there is moving, by an amount proportional to the mean free path times the velocity gradient.

Slip is a memory of one mean free path

A molecule arriving at a wall last collided about a mean free path away and carries the velocity from there. Averaged over arrivals and departures, that leaves the gas at the wall moving — by two per cent of the centreline speed at a Knudsen number of a hundredth, and sixty per cent more flow through a microchannel at a tenth.

regimes · Knudsen A force that depends on the molecular scale only through its logarithm. The force per unit length needed to move a 30° contact line of water at 1 mm/s, out to 1 mm, against the slip length on a logarithmic axis, from a picometre to a tenth of a millimetre. Each tenfold change in the slip length moves the force by the same fixed amount, so eight decades of the most uncertain length in the problem change the answer by a factor of about twenty — and at zero slip length the line keeps rising without end. The dashed curve takes the exact wedge's angle factor with a sharp cutoff; the solid one the thin-film wedge with Navier slip.

The drop a no-slip wall would never let spread

Liquid touching a solid moves with it, and nearly everywhere that is as close to exact as anything in fluid mechanics. At the edge of a spreading drop it cannot be: the stress in the corner rises as one over the distance from the edge, and the force needed to move the edge is infinite. Something slips over a nanometre, and because the answer depends on that length only through its logarithm, a drop spreads at almost the same rate whatever the something is.

misconceptions · The no-slip condition Where the inverse cube stops being an inverse cube. The force resisting a sphere's approach to a plane, against the gap, for four slip lengths. With no slip the force goes as one over the gap and has no limit. Any slip at all bends the curve over: below the slip length the force grows only as a logarithm. The curves separate where the gap falls through the slip length, which is exactly where a measurement has to be made and is why the apparatus has to close to nanometres rather than microns.

A length you can only measure by squeezing

No slip is a boundary condition rather than a law, and nothing in the equations requires it. The evidence that it is right for an ordinary liquid to within a nanometre comes from the one experiment whose small length is chosen rather than given — a squeeze film closed to tens of nanometres.

misconceptions · The no-slip condition Three dies, one melt, three flow curves. The apparent flow curve a capillary rheometer reports, for three dies whose radii differ by a factor of four. A material property cannot depend on the instrument, so the fact that these three do not lie on one another is a measurement of something other than a viscosity. The single curve drawn beneath them is what the same melt gives with the wall condition set to no slip.

The wall a melt really does slip on

For a simple liquid the slip length is under two nanometres, which is why no-slip is safe everywhere. For an entangled polymer melt it is a millimetre, which is larger than the die it is being pushed through — so the melt moves as a plug and the viscosity a rheometer reports is a property of the instrument.

misconceptions · The no-slip condition A layer read as slip gives a slip length that drifts. The slip length a drainage measurement would fit at each gap to the force of a 1-nanometre viscous layer, using the slip formula, for layers three and ten times as viscous and immobile. Far off it is the first-order value, −0.667 nm for κ = 3; closer, it shrinks towards zero — −0.597 nm at 10 nm and −0.525 at 5. A slip length that depends on the gap is the layer's signature, and the only one a drainage curve carries.

A viscous nanometre reads as slip until the gap is ten of it

A drainage experiment turns a molecular length at a wall into a measurable force, and reports it as a slip length. A layer of liquid a nanometre thick and several times as viscous as the bulk changes the same force by the same amount, to first order. Solved with the stratified viscosity, the two pictures part by a per cent only when the gap is eleven to seventeen layers wide, and the part of the difference a measurement can see is a slip length that drifts with the gap. A layer that does not move at all is exactly a wall in a different place.

misconceptions · The no-slip condition Posts slip as one over the root of their fraction. The slip length of a surface of posts, over the period of their square array, against the fraction of the surface that is solid, beside Philip's stripes along and across and the dilute limit in which each post is a lone disc dragged edgewise, (3/16)√(π/φ). At a hundredth solid the posts slip 2.87 periods against the stripes' 1.32; at a tenth 0.597 against 0.591, nearly equal; at a half 0.0663 against 0.11 along the stripes and 0.0552 across them.

A post holds liquid back by its radius, a stripe by its length

A surface of no-slip posts standing in a gas-filled texture lets liquid slip over it, and the slip length grows as one over the square root of the solid fraction, where a surface of stripes grows only as its logarithm. The reason is the oldest contrast in slow flow: a disc dragged through a viscous liquid has a drag proportional to its radius, which is Stokes' law, and a line has no finite drag at all, which is Stokes' paradox. But sparse posts beat stripes only while they are sparse.

kinematics · Boundary conditions Elasticity adds a spring at first order and a slip only at second. The damping's deficit, one minus the damping ratio, and the in-phase force against Λ on logarithmic axes. The in-phase force rises in proportion to Λ — a fitted slope of 1.0000 — and the damping's deficit as its square, 2.0000. A slip length changes the damping at first order and adds no spring at all, so a soft wall and a slipping one are distinct in kind: the soft wall announces itself first in the phase of the force.

A soft wall is read as slip only at second order

A drainage force smaller than Taylor's has been read as the liquid slipping at the wall. A wall that gives under the drainage pressure lowers the force too, and it can be mistaken for slip. Solved together, the flow and the elastic wall say how: the softness first adds a spring to the force, in phase with the motion, and only at second order takes anything from the damping a slip length is read from. When it does, the slip it imitates grows as the square of the frequency and falls as the square of the gap.

misconceptions · The no-slip condition Pressed into their grooves, the menisci cost a striped surface at most a quarter of its slip before it floods. The slip length along the stripes as a share of the flat meniscus's, against the liquid's pressure over the gas's as aΔp/γ, for gas fractions of 0.5, 0.8 and 0.95; the groove floods when the arc meets a vertical wall at its advancing angle — 110°, 120° and 150° at pressures 0.342, 0.5 and 0.866. 0.5: 0.93, 0.903 and 0.84 kept at those floods; 0.8: 0.913, 0.879 and 0.804 kept at those floods; 0.95: 0.888, 0.845 and 0.752 kept at those floods.

A bowed meniscus keeps most of its slip until the groove floods

The slip lengths of a striped superhydrophobic surface are computed with flat gas surfaces. Press the liquid against the texture and every meniscus bows into its groove as an arc pinned at the solid's edges, and the slip falls. It falls by less than the obvious worry says: at the pressure where a groove wall advancing at 120° lets the liquid in, a surface four-fifths gas still keeps 88 per cent of its slip, and even at a 150° wall's flood three-quarters remains. A striped surface does not lose its slip gradually under pressure. It keeps most of it, and then loses all of it when the groove floods.

kinematics · Boundary conditions Sheared between plates, a gas transmits its full viscous stress down to a few free paths across, and then a share proportional to its pressure. The shear stress a gas transmits between two plates, over Navier–Stokes's μU/H, against the rarefaction δ = √π/(2Kn), from the linearised kinetic equation; with Navier–Stokes and first-order slip, 1/(1 + 2·1.016/δ), and the free-molecular δ/√π. The kinetic stress is 0.908 of μU/H at δ = 20, 0.501 at 2, 0.0979 at 0.2; the slip formula is within 2.7 per cent at δ = 1.

A gas's viscosity ignores its pressure until the free path reaches the walls

Maxwell predicted in 1860 that a gas's viscosity does not depend on its density — halve the pressure and half as many molecules carry momentum across the flow, each twice as far — and measured it with swinging discs in 1866: unchanged from an atmosphere to a sixtieth of one. Solved across every pressure with the kinetic equation, the shear a gas transmits between two plates obeys him over five decades and then, once the free path reaches the gap, falls in proportion to the pressure. A millimetre gap reads half the true viscosity at fifteen pascals, and a vacuum gauge reads pressure from exactly that fall.

kinematics · Continuum Between plates the flow rate falls with rarefaction to a minimum near one free path across, then climbs without limit. The reduced flow rate G of a gas driven by a pressure gradient between two plates, against the rarefaction parameter δ = √π/(2Kn), from the linearised BGK equation; beside it Navier–Stokes with no slip (δ/6), with Maxwell's slip (δ/6 + 1.016) and the uncollided flux of molecules straight from a wall. The least flow rate is 1.538 at δ = 1.07, Kn = 0.827; at δ = 0.01 the solve gives 3.049, at δ = 0.001 4.449 and at δ = 10 2.769.

A thinning gas flows least at one free path across, and then more without end

Pump the gas out of a narrow channel and, for the same pressure gradient, less of it flows — until the channel is about one mean free path high. Thinner than that, more flows, and between infinite plates the flow rate climbs without limit, because the molecules carrying it are the ones skimming along the walls, whose flights only collisions with other molecules can end. Knudsen measured the minimum in 1909. The linearised kinetic equation puts it at a reduced flow rate of 1.538, at a Knudsen number of 0.83, and shows it is not a dip below the two closed forms but a place far above both.

regimes · Knudsen A mica sheet shields the glue's false slip only where the pressed region is narrower than the sheet bends. The slip length, in nanometres, that a dynamic drainage measurement at 100 Hz would read from a wall that does not slip, against the gap: a 3 mm sphere in water over bare glue of plane-strain modulus 1 GPa, and over mica sheets 1, 3 and 5 µm thick on the same glue. At 3 nm the bare glue reads 9.48 nm and the sheets 8.75, 2.68 and 1.06; at 30 nm, 0.1 against 0.099, 0.067 and 0.043.

A mica sheet hides its glue only at the smallest gaps, and changes how the false slip falls

A drainage measurement against a soft wall reads a slip that is not there, falling as the square of the gap. The wall in a surface-force apparatus is not a soft half-space but a stiff mica sheet on a soft glue, and the sheet spreads the drainage pressure over its own bending length before the glue feels it. Where the pressed region is wider than that length the sheet changes nothing; where it is narrower the sheet sinks as one piece, a spring in series with the liquid. That cuts the false slip only by the square of the bending length over the pressed width — threefold at three nanometres for three micrometres of mica — and it turns the slip's fall with the gap from the inverse square towards the inverse, which is the test an experimenter would have used to see it.

misconceptions · The no-slip condition

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Boundary conditionMeasurementModel limitThe no-slip conditionViscosityContinuumMean free pathSqueeze filmInverse problemKinetic theoryKnudsen numberLubrication

All concepts