Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Lubrication — where it appears

The thin-film limit of the equations of motion, in which inertia is absent and the pressure is set entirely by the shape of the gap. It is what lets a converging film of oil carry a load with no pump anywhere in the machine.

Named by 11 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The one term in ground effect that really is about carried air. The added mass of a plate approaching a plane, as a multiple of its free-air value. In free air a plate borrows ρπc²/4 per unit span — exactly 0.79 for a unit chord in unit density, which is the mass of the circle its chord spans. Near a wall the fluid in the gap must leave sideways through a narrowing passage, so it moves faster than it would in the open and carries more energy: the borrowed mass grows as the inverse of the gap and diverges as the gap closes. At half a chord it is 1.21 times, at a tenth 2.06, at a twentieth 3.12. This is a cushion in the ordinary sense — fluid that has to be got out of the way and resists being — and it is the term the steady argument has none of.

The cushion that is there after all

A wing near the ground makes more lift for reasons that have no cushion in them, and that account cannot reach two cases — a wing descending, and a rotor in the hover, where there is no steady flight for the image-vortex account to be about. Those cases have a term that really is about carried air, and it grows without limit as the gap closes.

misconceptions · Ground cushion Three exponents for one dimensionless group. The local slope of each error, measured over one decade at a time. The duct's is exactly 1, the long wave's is exactly 2, and the slender body's drifts from 1.900 to 1.733 across the range and never reaches either. The same geometric ratio, in three problems that look alike, and the third one has no exponent at all.

One group, three exponents

Lubrication theory, shallow water and slender-body theory are taught in three places and are one expansion in one group — a ratio of two lengths, with no speed, no viscosity and no fluid in it at all. The error is supposed to be second order. In three problems that look alike it is first order, second order, and an exponent that does not exist.

regimes · Slenderness A pure number with no fluid in it. The load a plane slider bearing carries, divided by everything dimensional in it. What is left is a function of the convergence ratio alone — no viscosity, no speed, no size, no material — so the tilt that carries the most load is decided before anything about the machine is known. It is the root of one transcendental equation, at 2.1887048.

The gap that carries the most

A bearing's most consequential dimension is decided by a number with no oil in it, no speed and no size — the root of one transcendental equation, at 2.1887048. And the maximum it sits on is flat enough that the value printed in every handbook is not it.

viscous · Lubrication The cushion changes its physics 0.36 mm from the ground. The two forces on a plate 10 cm across closing on a plane at 1 m/s in air at 20 °C, per metre of span, against the gap on logarithmic axes. The viscous squeeze film, Reynolds' lubrication result μVc³/h³, rises as the cube of the closeness; the inertial one, ρV²c³/24h² from the potential flow's added mass, as the square. They are equal where the gap Reynolds number ρVh/μ is exactly 24, at 0.361 mm, where each is 3.84e+2 N/m. Above that gap the cushion is the fluid's inertia and below it the fluid's viscosity — and at the crossover neither formula is accurate, since it is where one limit hands over to the other rather than a solution of the flow between them.

A cushion that changes its physics

A plate closing on a plane is resisted by the fluid it has to squeeze out, and the resistance is two different forces with two different laws — one from the fluid's inertia and one from its viscosity. They hand over at a gap of twenty-four kinematic viscosities per unit of closing speed, which for a wing in air is a third of a millimetre, and the two films disagree about whether the plate ever lands at all.

misconceptions · Ground cushion The best efficiency runs from nine-eighths of φ² to one. The best efficiency a peristaltic pump can reach, against the fraction of the channel its wave closes, with its two limits. For a shallow wave it is 9φ²/8, which is small — a wave closing a fifth of the channel is at best 4.5 per cent efficient. As the wave closes the channel the best efficiency tends to one, and its shortfall shrinks in proportion to the remaining gap: about 1.9(1 − φ). Nothing in between is independent of the amplitude.

The pump that is better the more it squeezes

A waving sheet swims at a cost per metre with no amplitude in it. A waving wall pumping fluid is the same mechanism turned round, and its efficiency is nothing like that: it starts at nine-eighths of the amplitude ratio squared, is exactly 2 − √3 at half closure, and rises towards one as the wave closes the tube — where the pump stops being a wave and becomes a piston.

kinematics · Continuity Squeezed past closing, the tube is held open by its own fluid. The channel's half-width along one wavelength of a travelling squeeze that would push an empty tube's wall 1.3 half-widths inward — past the centreline — and the wall the squeeze and the fluid's pressure make together, for three compliances. The empty squeeze would overlap the centreline across a sixth of the wavelength; with fluid in the tube, the pressure that builds ahead of the narrowest point pushes the wall back, and the gap stays open at a hundredth to a tenth of the half-width.

A squeezed tube is held open by its own fluid

A peristaltic pump with a prescribed wall wave gets better the more its wave closes the channel, and at closure it becomes a piston. A real one squeezes an elastic wall and lets the fluid push back. Then the channel never closes: the pressure ahead of the narrowest point holds a gap open that grows as the square root of the wall's give, squeezing harder past closure pumps less, and the pump behaves as a displacement pump until a pressure of about one over its compliance blows the throat open — with an efficiency that stops short of one by an amount that grows with the wall's give.

kinematics · Continuity A layer read as slip gives a slip length that drifts. The slip length a drainage measurement would fit at each gap to the force of a 1-nanometre viscous layer, using the slip formula, for layers three and ten times as viscous and immobile. Far off it is the first-order value, −0.667 nm for κ = 3; closer, it shrinks towards zero — −0.597 nm at 10 nm and −0.525 at 5. A slip length that depends on the gap is the layer's signature, and the only one a drainage curve carries.

A viscous nanometre reads as slip until the gap is ten of it

A drainage experiment turns a molecular length at a wall into a measurable force, and reports it as a slip length. A layer of liquid a nanometre thick and several times as viscous as the bulk changes the same force by the same amount, to first order. Solved with the stratified viscosity, the two pictures part by a per cent only when the gap is eleven to seventeen layers wide, and the part of the difference a measurement can see is a slip length that drifts with the gap. A layer that does not move at all is exactly a wall in a different place.

misconceptions · The no-slip condition Elasticity adds a spring at first order and a slip only at second. The damping's deficit, one minus the damping ratio, and the in-phase force against Λ on logarithmic axes. The in-phase force rises in proportion to Λ — a fitted slope of 1.0000 — and the damping's deficit as its square, 2.0000. A slip length changes the damping at first order and adds no spring at all, so a soft wall and a slipping one are distinct in kind: the soft wall announces itself first in the phase of the force.

A soft wall is read as slip only at second order

A drainage force smaller than Taylor's has been read as the liquid slipping at the wall. A wall that gives under the drainage pressure lowers the force too, and it can be mistaken for slip. Solved together, the flow and the elastic wall say how: the softness first adds a spring to the force, in phase with the motion, and only at second order takes anything from the damping a slip length is read from. When it does, the slip it imitates grows as the square of the frequency and falls as the square of the gap.

misconceptions · The no-slip condition The paint pushes a scraper off the wall, and roughly as one over the square of the angle it is held at. The force the fluid exerts on a still blade at angle α to a wall sliding into the corner, per unit span over μU ln(R/ε): its component pushing the blade away from the wall and the size of its component dragging it along with the wall, towards the apex. At 10° they are 196 and 22.9; at 45°, 8.56 and 4.88; at 90°, 1.36 and 2.14; at 150°, 0.0757 and 0.924.

A scraper held flat is pushed off the wall it scrapes

A corner stirred from far away fills with an endless sequence of eddies. Drive the corner at the corner instead — let one of its walls slide under a still blade, as paint slides under a scraper — and the eddies vanish: every streamline turns once, and the stress rises into the corner without limit. G. I. Taylor solved it in 1962. The paint pushes the blade away from the wall with a force that grows as one over the square of the blade's angle, so a blade held flat rides up on what it was meant to remove, and the force is finite only because something too small to appear in the problem ends the corner.

viscous · Corner A mica sheet shields the glue's false slip only where the pressed region is narrower than the sheet bends. The slip length, in nanometres, that a dynamic drainage measurement at 100 Hz would read from a wall that does not slip, against the gap: a 3 mm sphere in water over bare glue of plane-strain modulus 1 GPa, and over mica sheets 1, 3 and 5 µm thick on the same glue. At 3 nm the bare glue reads 9.48 nm and the sheets 8.75, 2.68 and 1.06; at 30 nm, 0.1 against 0.099, 0.067 and 0.043.

A mica sheet hides its glue only at the smallest gaps, and changes how the false slip falls

A drainage measurement against a soft wall reads a slip that is not there, falling as the square of the gap. The wall in a surface-force apparatus is not a soft half-space but a stiff mica sheet on a soft glue, and the sheet spreads the drainage pressure over its own bending length before the glue feels it. Where the pressed region is wider than that length the sheet changes nothing; where it is narrower the sheet sinks as one piece, a spring in series with the liquid. That cuts the false slip only by the square of the bending length over the pressed width — threefold at three nanometres for three micrometres of mica — and it turns the slip's fall with the gap from the inverse square towards the inverse, which is the test an experimenter would have used to see it.

misconceptions · The no-slip condition Pressed with one load, a steeper blade leaves a thinner film, and without a land a steep one cannot float at all. The film a loaded scraper leaves on the surface, in micrometres, against the angle its face makes with the surface, at a load of 100 N per metre of span on an ink of 0.1 Pa·s moving at 5 m/s: with a flat land 0.1 mm long under the edge, and with none. With the land the film is 110 µm at 10°, 1.69 at 30° and 0.268 at 60°. Without one it is the whole gap, 145 µm at 8°, and above 44° the gap the load needs is below a ten-thousandth of a nanometre: the edge is in contact.

A pressed blade floats on its land and leaves half the gap behind

A scraper or a doctor blade is not held at a gap; it is pressed on with a load, and it rises until the liquid it lets through carries that load. Without a flat land under its edge the liquid can carry it only through the corner's logarithm, so the gap falls exponentially with the load, and a blade steeper than about forty-four degrees cannot float at a working load at all — its edge is in contact. Give it a land a tenth of a millimetre long and the film becomes half the gap, falls as one over the load, and is a quarter of a micrometre at sixty degrees. The land is also why a blade's film grows as its edge wears.

viscous · Corner

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Model limitMeasurementThe no-slip conditionCreeping flowReynolds equationSqueeze filmViscosityAdded massDissipationEfficiencyInverse problemOptimisation

All concepts