Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
The collection

Every essay — page 10

Page 10 of 39, continuing through the fields in the same order.

Flows and fields Ideal flow Circulation and lift Viscosity Regimes and numbers Compressible flow Transition and turbulence Fluids at work What is taught wrongly Series Concepts Regimes Refutations Search

Compressible flow

What changes when density stops being a constant. Shocks, expansion fans, nozzles that work backwards, and the one place on this site where an inviscid flow has drag.

One nozzle, five back pressures, five different flows. The duct above, and the static pressure along it below, computed station by station from the local area. Where a shock stands inside the divergent section its position was solved for rather than placed: the shock spends total pressure, which sets the subsonic Mach number at the exit, which has to match the imposed back pressure.

One area, two answers

The area of a duct at a station fixes the Mach number there — twice over. A ratio of 2.5 is satisfied at Mach 0.24 and again at Mach 2.44, nothing local chooses between them, and where the choice cannot be made consistently a shock appears inside the duct to join the two.

6 figures A normal shock at Mach 2.00, and what crosses it unchanged. The state in front of the shock and the state behind it. Every ratio was computed from the standard jump relations and then substituted back into mass, momentum and energy, which is an independent route — a mistyped exponent in the total-pressure expression cannot survive a momentum balance it never appeared in. The residuals are printed below because a check nobody can see is a check nobody can audit.

The jump the equations allow

A shock is a discontinuity in a fluid, which sounds like a breakdown of the description rather than a solution of it. It is a solution: mass, momentum and energy can all be satisfied across a jump, and every ratio across one follows from that alone.

6 figures The second law is the only thing that forbids the other half of this curve. Entropy change across a normal shock, against the Mach number in front of it. The solid branch is the compression shock that exists. The dashed branch below Mach one is the expansion shock, and it satisfies mass, momentum and energy exactly — the residuals are zero to machine precision. It is refused by the second law alone, the one statement in the problem that no conservation residual can show.

The only law that forbids it

The jump conditions permit a discontinuity in either direction. An expansion shock conserves mass, momentum and energy exactly — the residuals are zero to machine precision — and it does not exist. Nothing that can be drawn rules it out.

6 figures Everything a normal shock does, against the Mach number in front of it. Four quantities across a normal shock, each scaled to fit one axis. Pressure and density rise without limit and without bound as the Mach number grows; the Mach number behind falls towards a floor it never passes; and the total pressure — the flow's ability to be turned back into speed — collapses. That last curve is why a supersonic intake is designed around avoiding a single strong shock.

What a shock costs

All the heat survives a shock and none of it is lost. What is lost is the ability to turn that heat back into speed — 27.9 per cent of it at Mach 2 and 93.8 per cent at Mach 5 — and every supersonic intake ever built is a scheme for paying less.

6 figures A 10° wedge at Mach 2.00 has two shocks that solve it. The wedge turns the flow through a fixed angle, and the θ–β–M relation offers two shock angles that achieve it. The weak solution, drawn steeply forward, leaves the flow supersonic and is what a wedge in a free stream produces. The strong solution leaves it subsonic and appears where downstream pressure forces it. Nothing local to the wedge chooses between them.

A shock that leans

Tilt a shock and only the velocity component across it is changed — the component along it passes through untouched. That single observation turns every oblique shock into a normal shock in disguise, and it is why a wedge at Mach 2 leaves the flow supersonic while a blunt nose does not.

6 figures Past 23.0° at Mach 2.00 there is no attached shock. The same wedge at two half-angles. On the left the θ–β–M relation has a root and the shock sits on the nose. On the right it has none, and the solver throws rather than returning the nearest thing — which matters, because a solver that quietly clamped to the maximum would draw a neat attached shock on a body that cannot carry one. The bow shock on the right is indicative: its shape is not solved here.

When the wedge is too blunt

Every curve of shock angle against deflection has a maximum. Past it there is no attached shock at any angle — the solver has no root to return and must say so, rather than quietly handing back the nearest thing and drawing a picture that cannot exist.

6 figures The same 10° turn, taken both ways. A supersonic stream turned away from itself expands through a fan of Mach waves and keeps every bit of its total pressure. Turned into itself through the same angle it shocks, and pays. Nothing in the equations distinguishes the two cases except the sign of the angle: compression waves converge and steepen into a front, expansion waves diverge and spread.

Turning the other way is free

Compression through ten degrees at Mach 2 costs 1.54 per cent of the total pressure. Expansion through the same ten degrees costs exactly nothing — not approximately nothing, nothing — and the two are the same equations with the sign of one angle changed.

6 figures Lift and wave drag on a flat plate at Mach 2, exactly and to first order. The lift and wave-drag coefficients of a supersonic section against incidence, computed face by face from shocks and fans, with Ackeret's linear result dashed over them. The two agree to three decimal places at small angles and part company slowly — which is what a first-order theory is supposed to do, and evidence rather than tautology, since the two routes share no algebra.

Drag with nothing to rub

d'Alembert's paradox says a closed body in a steady, inviscid flow has no drag, and four essays on this site argue it and none of them is wrong. Above Mach one it is false — the flow is still inviscid, still steady, and the drag is real, finite and quadratic in incidence.

6 figures Three waves out of one discontinuity. The x–t diagram of the burst diaphragm. A shock runs right at a speed of its own, a contact surface follows it more slowly, and an expansion fan spreads left as a family of rays that opens with time — the three wave families the Euler equations possess, produced at once by an initial condition with no waves in it at all. Every straight line here is a speed the solution computed, and the fan is drawn as the rays it actually consists of.

One diaphragm, every wave

Two states of the same gas at rest, separated by nothing, is the simplest initial condition compressible flow admits — and its answer contains all three waves the equations possess at once: a shock one way, an expansion fan the other, and between them a surface across which the density jumps and the pressure does not.

8 figures Two different physics, one destination. The Fanno and Rayleigh lines, each with temperature up the page and entropy across, each referred to its own sonic state. Neither is a curve anybody drew: the entropy was swept over Mach number and its maximum located, and it sits at Mach 1 on both to within the resolution of the sweep. The subsonic branch runs up to the nose from the left and the supersonic branch runs up from below, so whatever is being done to the flow, it can only be moved towards that point.

Two ways to choke

Friction and heat are different physics acting on different conservation laws, and they drive a duct's flow to exactly the same place. Both have their entropy maximum at Mach 1, so neither can push a subsonic flow past it and both drag a supersonic one down to it — and where their two curves cross is a shock.

8 figures The wall is what cancels the waves it made. The characteristic net of a minimum-length nozzle designed for Mach 2.4, with 18 waves. The pale lines run from the sharp throat down to the axis, reflect there by symmetry, and run back up to the wall; the wall turns through exactly the angle needed to cancel each one as it arrives, so nothing reflects back into the flow and the exit is uniform at Mach 2.400 and parallel to 0.0 degrees. The area ratio decides the Mach number and this net decides the shape, and the two agree on the exit height to 0.51 per cent at this resolution.

The wall that cancels its own waves

The area ratio of a supersonic nozzle fixes its exit Mach number and says nothing whatever about its shape. What fixes the shape is a wave-by-wave construction in which the wall turns through exactly the angle needed to absorb each expansion as it arrives — and getting it wrong leaves a stream full of oblique shocks at precisely the right Mach number.

8 figures What the skin settles at, before anything is done to it. The adiabatic wall temperature against Mach number, in air at 216.7 K, with the stagnation temperature above it. The gap between the two is the recovery factor, which is 0.8417 here and stays there at every Mach number — it is a property of the Prandtl number and not of the speed. At Mach 2 the skin sits at 363 K, at Mach 3 at 545 K, and at Mach 5 at 1128 K, which is past what aluminium will do. Nothing has been burnt and nothing has been rubbed: the air was brought to rest, and this is where its kinetic energy went.

The wall that heats itself

A surface told nothing about its temperature does not settle at the air's. It settles most of the way to the stagnation temperature, and the heat flux is driven from that invented temperature rather than from the free stream's — so a wall hotter than the air can be being heated by it.

8 figures