Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Theme

The thread: One number decides the regime — page 4

Page 4 of 34, continuing through the 305 essays this motif runs through.

305 essays carry this thread — page 4 of 34.

One nozzle, five back pressures, five different flows. The duct above, and the static pressure along it below, computed station by station from the local area. Where a shock stands inside the divergent section its position was solved for rather than placed: the shock spends total pressure, which sets the subsonic Mach number at the exit, which has to match the imposed back pressure. Compressible flow

One area, two answers

The area of a duct at a station fixes the Mach number there — twice over. A ratio of 2.5 is satisfied at Mach 0.24 and again at Mach 2.44, nothing local chooses between them, and where the choice cannot be made consistently a shock appears inside the duct to join the two.

 The number on a streamline is a flow rate. Two streamlines and a crooked line drawn between them. The volume of fluid crossing that line every second, integrated from the velocity field, is the difference between the two streamfunction values at its ends — which is what makes a streamline a label rather than merely a curve. Flows and fields

The number on a streamline is a flow rate

Streamlines get drawn as decoration — curves the flow follows, spaced however the plotting looked best. Each one carries a number, the difference between two of those numbers is the volume of fluid passing between them every second, and it does not matter what route the measurement takes.

 Two depths, and a gap the model will not describe. The surface either side of a hydraulic jump at an arriving Froude number of 5.05. Both depths are exact consequences of the momentum balance. The distance between them is not: the shallow-water model has no length scale in it and cannot say how far the transition takes, so the region between the two levels is left blank and the six-depth rule of thumb beside it is somebody's measurement rather than this site's result. Fluids at work

The shock in a river

Shallow water is a gas whose ratio of specific heats is two. The white water below a weir is a shock wave, momentum is conserved across it exactly, energy is not, and one direction is forbidden for the same reason an expansion shock is forbidden — which makes the analogy exact to first order and wrong at the second.

 Creeping flow, and the same body with inertia. The exact creeping-flow solution beside a solved field at a Reynolds number where inertia matters. The creeping flow is a mirror image of itself front to back — a photograph of it run backwards is a photograph of it — and the field with inertia has a wake, which is what a direction of time looks like. Regimes and numbers

The world with no inertia

Drop the viscosity and the equations become exactly solvable and wrong about drag. Drop the inertia instead and they become exactly solvable again — and for a cylinder in an unbounded fluid there is no solution at all, which took fifty years to notice and longer to fix.

 Finding the aerodynamic centre by sweeping the chord. How fast the pitching moment changes with incidence, plotted against where along the chord the moment is taken. The curve crosses zero once, and that crossing is the aerodynamic centre — the single point about which pitching the wing does not change the moment. Circulation and lift

Where the lift acts

Lift gets drawn as an arrow, and an arrow has to start somewhere. The pressure is spread over the whole surface, so the choice of where to put the arrow is free — except that exactly one point on the chord has the property of not changing its answer when the wing is pitched.

 u⁺ = (1/κ) ln y⁺ + B, integrated rather than asserted. The velocity profile in wall units, produced by integrating the mixing-length closure outward from the wall. The straight portion is the log law and the constants beside it were least-squares fitted to the integrated curve over 50 < y⁺ < 500 — so the 1/κ is a measurement on the drawing rather than the number that was fed in. The viscous sublayer u⁺ = y⁺ comes out rather than being pasted on. Transition and turbulence

A guess with a constant in it

Prandtl's mixing length is one line — an eddy near a wall can only be as big as its distance from the wall. Integrate it and the whole structure of a turbulent wall profile falls out, sublayer and log region and all. That is a fact about the assumption, and the essay is careful about which.

 Two depths for the same energy, and one for the least. Specific energy against depth for a discharge of 0.5 square metres per second per metre of width. Every energy above the minimum is carried by two different depths — one fast and shallow, one slow and deep — and the minimum is carried by exactly one. That depth is the critical depth, the Froude number there is one, and the least energy is three halves of it; all three are found here by search and checked against their closed forms. Fluids at work

The depth that costs least

For a given flow there are two depths that carry it at any energy above a floor, and exactly one at the floor. That one depth is where the Froude number is one, the least energy is exactly three halves of it, and a bump in the bed that asks for more than the flow has does not thin the water — it backs it up.

 Where the flow over the section first reaches Mach one. Two curves running towards each other. The falling one is the section's peak suction, solved exactly in incompressible flow and then deepened by the Prandtl–Glauert factor as the free-stream Mach number rises. The rising one is the pressure coefficient at which the local flow would be exactly sonic. Where they cross is the critical Mach number, and above it there is a pocket of supersonic flow on a subsonic aeroplane. Regimes and numbers

The pocket on top of the wing

An airliner cruising at Mach 0.85 has subsonic flow almost everywhere and a patch of supersonic flow over its wing. Closing that patch takes a shock, the shock separates the layer beneath it, and the correction that predicts all of this also predicts, in the plainest terms, where it stops being true.

 Circulation across the span, for three planforms. How much circulation each part of the wing carries, plotted across the span. It has to reach zero at both tips, because a wing cannot carry circulation off its end, and the rate at which it falls is what determines the vorticity shed into the wake. Circulation and lift

The price of having ends

An infinitely long wing in a fluid with no viscosity has no drag at all. Cut two ends into it and the drag appears — not from friction, which is still absent, but from the fact that circulation cannot be carried off the end of anything.

All themes