Theme

The thread: One number decides the regime — page 46

Page 46 of 50, continuing through the 450 essays this motif runs through.

450 essays carry this thread — page 46 of 50.

$At a coast the swell's water goes back, or goes along. The Lagrangian mean current — the Stokes drift plus the Eulerian current — under an 8-second swell arriving straight at a coast, in seas 8, 25 and 60 metres deep, each as a fraction of its own surface drift against depth as a fraction of the water's. Left, the part across the shore, positive onshore; right, the part along it. The cross-shore parts carry no net water. At 8 metres, inside the Ekman layer, the whole exchange is across the shore; at 25 the return is shared with a current along the coast; at 60 the open shelf's own rotation has already taken the transport back, and the coast has little left to do.$ Flows and fields

A coast sends the drift back, or sends it along

A shelf sea under a swell keeps part of the Stokes drift's transport, turned to the right by the rotating Earth, and near a coast some of it points at the land. The sea answers with a slope in its surface. In water shallower than an Ekman depth the slope drives the water straight back as an undertow, as it would without rotation; a few Ekman depths down the coast turns the transport into a current along the shore instead, and there the sea can slope down towards the land it faces.

A layer read as slip gives a slip length that drifts. The slip length a drainage measurement would fit at each gap to the force of a 1-nanometre viscous layer, using the slip formula, for layers three and ten times as viscous and immobile. Far off it is the first-order value, −0.667 nm for κ = 3; closer, it shrinks towards zero — −0.597 nm at 10 nm and −0.525 at 5. A slip length that depends on the gap is the layer's signature, and the only one a drainage curve carries.

What is taught wrongly

A viscous nanometre reads as slip until the gap is ten of it

A drainage experiment turns a molecular length at a wall into a measurable force, and reports it as a slip length. A layer of liquid a nanometre thick and several times as viscous as the bulk changes the same force by the same amount, to first order. Solved with the stratified viscosity, the two pictures part by a per cent only when the gap is eleven to seventeen layers wide, and the part of the difference a measurement can see is a slip length that drifts with the gap. A layer that does not move at all is exactly a wall in a different place.

$With a wake, the bulb belongs at the bow. The Wigley hull's wave resistance with a spherical bulb, as a fraction of the bare hull's, against Froude number, with a wake fraction of 0.25: the bulb just ahead of the bow, and the same bulb just behind the stern. Without a wake the two curves are one. With it they separate: the stern's waves are made by slowed water and are weaker, so the bulb's cancelling wave has less to cancel there, and at the design speed of 0.30 the bow bulb leaves 0.443 of the bare resistance and the stern bulb 0.624.$ Regimes and numbers

The stern's wake puts the bulb at the bow

Michell's thin-ship integral cannot tell a ship's bow from its stern: reverse any hull and its wave resistance is unchanged, so the least-resistance hull is symmetric and a bulb is worth as much at the stern as at the bow. Real ships are fuller aft and put their bulbs forward. Let the stern's waves be made by water the hull's own boundary layer has slowed, and both follow: the optimum hull leans aft, and a bulb at the bow cuts the waves by far more than the same bulb at the stern.

Fly level through short waves, follow long ones. The mean drag of the two strategies against wavelength, for a wave 0.4 m high at 8 m/s: flying level at the best mean depth for that sea, and following the surface at the calm boat's best depth, with the flat-water drag as the faint line. Level flight costs about the same whatever the wavelength; following costs the square of the heave it demands and falls away as the waves lengthen. Into the waves the two cost the same at 15.6 m; running with them, where the boat meets each wave slowly, at 5.9 m.

Fluids at work

A foil flies level through a short sea and follows a long one

A foiling boat in waves has two ways to fly. It can hold its height and let the surface rise and fall over its foil, or it can follow the surface and heave with every wave. Flying level costs a deeper ride and a few per cent of drag whatever the wavelength; following costs the square of the heave, which grows with the frequency the boat meets the waves at. Into a head sea the two cost the same at a wavelength of about sixteen metres, running with the waves at about six, and the wave's height hardly moves either.

$A follower can wander further fore and aft than sideways. A flapping follower's saving, averaged over a wander of its place with the standard deviation shown, as a fraction of its own induced drag: fore and aft, holding the phase that suits its average place, for tips swinging a tenth, a fifth and four-tenths of a span; and sideways, beating in phase. The saving in place is 0.837. Sideways it has halved at a wander of 0.185 spans; fore and aft, with a fifth-span swing, only at 0.804, a third of the wake's wavelength, and with the four-tenths a cruising bird swings, at 0.37. With a tenth-span swing it never halves.$ Circulation and lift

A flapping follower can drift fore and aft, but not sideways

A bird in a flapping V has to be in the right place and beat at the right phase for that place, and no bird holds its place exactly. Drifting fore and aft costs it phase, at a full beat for every wavelength of the wake; drifting sideways takes it off the leader's tip vortex. The first is two to four times cheaper than the second, it can be bought back by re-timing the beat within about one beat of the drift, and the second cannot be bought back at all. So the precision a follower needs is sideways, and the attention it needs is on its timing.

Viscosity

A warm bush stops the bearing hunting

A bearing whose motor is derated on its housing's temperature can hunt, jumping between a cool film and a hot one on the housing's clock. Let the bush warm with the housing, and a second feedback joins the first, of the kind that usually makes things run away. It does the opposite: a warm wall is a stiffer drive, the stiffening closes the S the cycle runs round, and past a bush coupling of about a third the bearing settles, warm and derated, however the protection is set.

$The free waist is flat-bottomed, and follows the sweep aft. The cross-section each waist removes along the body, as a fraction of the fuselage's greatest, for the root strip unswept, at 30° and at 45°. The linear programme's waists have flat bottoms and steep sides: depth is spent only where the strip needs it. With sweep they lengthen aft rather than deepen — 24.8, 24.3 and 26.9 per cent. The best single dents, dashed, must widen and deepen instead: 39.8, 45.7 and 52.6 per cent.$ Ideal flow

A free waist needs half the depth, and the sweep costs it nothing

A cosine-squared dent in a fuselage cancels its overspeed at an unswept wing's root for about a third of the fuselage's cross-section, and nothing can remove the overspeed, only move it. Let a linear programme choose the waist's shape instead, and half of that third turns out to have been the dent's fault. The free waist is flat-bottomed and steep-sided, and for a swept root it simply runs aft with the chord, where a single dent has to widen and deepen.

$Posts slip as one over the root of their fraction. The slip length of a surface of posts, over the period of their square array, against the fraction of the surface that is solid, beside Philip's stripes along and across and the dilute limit in which each post is a lone disc dragged edgewise, (3/16)√(π/φ). At a hundredth solid the posts slip 2.87 periods against the stripes' 1.32; at a tenth 0.597 against 0.591, nearly equal; at a half 0.0663 against 0.11 along the stripes and 0.0552 across them.$ Flows and fields

A post holds liquid back by its radius, a stripe by its length

A surface of no-slip posts standing in a gas-filled texture lets liquid slip over it, and the slip length grows as one over the square root of the solid fraction, where a surface of stripes grows only as its logarithm. The reason is the oldest contrast in slow flow: a disc dragged through a viscous liquid has a drag proportional to its radius, which is Stokes' law, and a line has no finite drag at all, which is Stokes' paradox. But sparse posts beat stripes only while they are sparse.

Four views, four guesses at what they missed. The earlier essay's field — two puffs and an oblique streak — and its reconstructions from the same four views, each choosing the part of the field the views cannot see by a different assumption. With none it is set to zero: an error of 42.8 per cent. The smoothest field the views allow: 39.8. A non-negative field: 24.7. A sum of Gaussian puffs of one width: 37.6. The first three meet every one of the 96 rays; the dictionary's does not.

What is taught wrongly

A prior the pictures can refute is the one worth having

A few views of a flow with no symmetry leave most of the field unseen, and a reconstruction has to fill that part in by assuming something. Three common assumptions were tried on the same field and the same views. Non-negativity saves three views of ten, and five on a field of puffs; smoothness saves one; a dictionary of known shapes saves none unless it is exactly right, and when it is nearly right it can be wrong by a factor of a hundred. The prior that helps most is also the one the data can catch being wrong.

All themes