Theme

The thread: One number decides the regime — page 6

Page 6 of 34, continuing through the 305 essays this motif runs through.

305 essays carry this thread — page 6 of 34.

The pressure coefficient, read off the field. The closed-form surface pressure of a cylinder, and the same quantity computed from the speeds of the solved field at the same points. The coefficient is exactly one where the flow stops and exactly minus three at the shoulder, and those two numbers are properties of the shape rather than of the tunnel.

The number that does not depend on the tunnel

A pressure measured in a wind tunnel is a fact about that tunnel on that day. Divide it by the dynamic pressure and it becomes a fact about the shape — the same at any speed, in any fluid, at any scale, and equal to exactly one where the flow comes to rest.

Everything a normal shock does, against the Mach number in front of it. Four quantities across a normal shock, each scaled to fit one axis. Pressure and density rise without limit and without bound as the Mach number grows; the Mach number behind falls towards a floor it never passes; and the total pressure — the flow's ability to be turned back into speed — collapses. That last curve is why a supersonic intake is designed around avoiding a single strong shock.

Compressible flow

What a shock costs

All the heat survives a shock and none of it is lost. What is lost is the ability to turn that heat back into speed — 27.9 per cent of it at Mach 2 and 93.8 per cent at Mach 5 — and every supersonic intake ever built is a scheme for paying less.

Particles at St = 1, against the flow that carries them. Particle paths and the streamlines they were released on, in this site's exact cylinder solution. At small Stokes number the two are indistinguishable and the body catches nothing; as the particles get heavier their paths straighten, cross the streamlines, and begin to strike. The paths are integrated with Stokes drag and nothing else — no gravity, no lift, no effect of the particles on the flow.

Regimes and numbers

Whether the droplet turns

The air goes round the wing. Whether what is carried in it goes round too is decided by one number — and below a critical value of that number the body collects nothing at all, however many droplets are thrown at it, because the flow turns every one of them in time.

A 10° wedge at Mach 2.00 has two shocks that solve it. The wedge turns the flow through a fixed angle, and the θ–β–M relation offers two shock angles that achieve it. The weak solution, drawn steeply forward, leaves the flow supersonic and is what a wedge in a free stream produces. The strong solution leaves it subsonic and appears where downstream pressure forces it. Nothing local to the wedge chooses between them.

Compressible flow

A shock that leans

Tilt a shock and only the velocity component across it is changed — the component along it passes through untouched. That single observation turns every oblique shock into a normal shock in disguise, and it is why a wedge at Mach 2 leaves the flow supersonic while a blunt nose does not.

Transition and turbulence

A threshold with a closed form

A layer of fluid heated from below sits still until buoyancy overcomes both diffusions at once, and then it convects. Unlike every other threshold in this field, that one is an eigenvalue with an exact answer, and the answer is 27π⁴/4.

Three times the wind, on a reach. The polar diagram: boat speed in every direction, as a multiple of the true wind speed, for drag angles of 14 and 6 degrees. The shaded wedge at the top is the no-go zone, whose half-angle is exactly the sum of the two drag angles. Everywhere outside about twice that angle the boat is faster than the wind, and the maximum is 2.92 times the wind at 110 degrees — which is 1/sin λ at 90° + λ, both checked.

Fluids at work

Faster than the wind that drives it

An ice yacht in a fifteen-knot breeze does forty. That is not a trick and it does not need a special sail — it follows from two drag angles and a triangle, and the best speed a boat can reach is one over the sine of their sum.

The same patch, 6 periods later, in two flows. A round patch of 848 marked particles, advanced 6 periods by the blinking flow and by a steady flow of the same strength. The steady flow has drawn the patch into a smooth ribbon along a streamline and every particle in it is still on the streamline it started on; the blinking flow has folded the patch through itself repeatedly and its particles are spread across the whole region. Neither flow has any diffusion in it and neither has lost a particle. The difference between them is that one depends on time.

Flows and fields

No randomness, and it mixes anyway

A steady two-dimensional flow cannot mix, however fast it is stirred, because its trajectories are its streamlines. Switch two vortices on and off alternately and the same fluid, obeying an exact map with nothing random in it, folds a patch of dye through itself until neighbouring particles separate by a factor of a thousand in six periods.

Two drag laws, one derived and one fitted. Flat-plate drag coefficient against Reynolds number, laminar and turbulent, on log axes. The laminar curve is Blasius' similarity solution, solved by shooting; the turbulent one is the 1/7-power correlation, which was fitted to experiment and is drawn dashed-in-kind to keep the difference visible. Their slopes differ — −1/2 against −1/5 — so the gap between them widens rather than staying put.

Viscosity

The cost of going turbulent

A turbulent boundary layer costs several times the friction of a laminar one, and the multiple is not a constant — it rises with Reynolds number, because the two laws have different exponents. That is why laminar flow is worth more on a long fast surface than on a short slow one.

The fluid a moving cylinder carries with it. Kinetic energy density around a cylinder moving through fluid that is at rest far away. The fluid is not dragged along in a lump: it is pushed aside in front and closes in behind, and the energy in that motion is what has to be supplied to change the body's speed.

Ideal flow

The force of getting going

The exact theory says a body moving steadily through an ideal fluid feels no force at all. It does not say the fluid is free. Accelerating the body has to accelerate the fluid too, and the bill for that is exactly the mass of fluid the body displaces.

All themes