Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Theme

The thread: The exact theory is wrong — page 15

Page 15 of 22, continuing through the 193 essays this motif runs through.

193 essays carry this thread — page 15 of 22.

The temperature behind a shock, which is not the jump condition's. The static temperature along the flow behind a Mach 6 normal shock, with the frozen value the jump conditions give and the equilibrium value they give a long way behind. The gas arrives at 2382 K and settles at 2059, over about four tenths of a millimetre. Compressible flow

A gas that has not finished being shocked

The jump conditions give the state a long way behind a shock. Immediately behind it the molecules have not started vibrating yet, so the temperature is 2,382 K where the equilibrium answer is 2,059 — and the gas takes four tenths of a millimetre to get from one to the other.

 A threshold that is a curve, not a pressure. The tension a rectangular pulse has to reach to make a five-micron bubble run away, against how long the pulse lasts. At a tenth of a microsecond it takes forty bar; at a hundred microseconds it takes 1.05, which is within about one per cent of the static threshold. There is no such thing as the cavitation pressure of this bubble on its own. Fluids at work

A threshold that is also a duration

The cavitation number treats inception as a pressure: below it the liquid tears, above it does not. A five-micron bubble asked to grow in 0.3 microseconds needs 43 bar of tension and the same bubble given a hundred needs 1.05, because it has to make a journey and not merely respond.

 The two long-wave speeds, and the swirl at which one of them stops. For uniform axial velocity the wave speeds follow from the criticality condition by a Galilean boost: c = W(1 ± 2S/j), with j the first zero of J1. The upstream-running root crosses zero exactly at S = j/2 = 1.9159, and above that swirl no disturbance can travel upstream — which is what subcritical and supercritical mean here and in an open channel. Ideal flow

The swirl that holds a wave still

A swirling flow down a pipe carries waves, and above a certain swirl one of them stops moving. Below it, a disturbance downstream can send information upstream; above it, the flow has outrun its own waves. The words are open-channel flow's words, and they are the same words for the same reason.

 The wall shear, marched to the station where it stops. Howarth's linearly retarded outer flow, marched with an implicit finite-difference scheme from a Blasius profile. The wall shear falls, its slope steepens, and at x = 0.11983 it reaches zero — against Howarth's 0.1198, which is a quarter of a per cent. There is nothing downstream of it: the solution does not continue. Viscosity

The singularity a layer makes for itself

March Prandtl's equations into an adverse pressure gradient and the wall shear reaches zero with an infinite slope at a finite station, and the solution cannot be continued past it. The singularity is real, it is not a numerical difficulty, and it belongs to the boundary condition rather than to the equations.

 The exact solution and its three approximations, at ε = 0.02. The outer solution is excellent everywhere except in a layer of width ε at the left, where it is wrong by a whole unit. The inner solution is excellent inside that layer and wrong everywhere else. The composite is their sum less the part they agree about, and it is within order ε of the exact solution across the whole interval — which is the entire content of matched asymptotics, drawn. Regimes and numbers

One formula for both ends

Two limits, each with its own description, neither valid everywhere. The composite is the sum less the part they agree about, and it is uniformly good — but the overlap region that justifies the construction does not exist at ε = 0.01, and the composite is still accurate to two per cent there.

 Two theories, one composite, and the aspect ratio between them. The lift-curve slope against aspect ratio. Prandtl's lifting line is exact as the aspect ratio goes to infinity and Jones's slender-wing theory is exact as it goes to zero, and each is generous outside its own limit. Helmbold's formula reduces to both with no free constant, which is what a composite expansion is, and runs under them where they disagree. Circulation and lift

Where the line stops being a line

Prandtl's lifting line replaces a wing with a single bound vortex and its trailing sheet, and the formula that comes out is the most quoted in low-speed aerodynamics. Solved numerically at aspect ratio one it returns its own closed form to sixteen decimals — and the answer is forty-one per cent too high.

 Five flows past one cylinder, every one of them a solution. Surface pressure round a cylinder in a stream, at five circulations. Each satisfies Laplace's equation, the tangency condition on the body and the condition at infinity, and each has a different lift. Nothing in the problem chooses between them: the domain has a hole in it, so the potential is many-valued and the circulation is a free constant. Ideal flow

The constant a hole leaves behind

In a region without holes, Laplace's equation and the boundary values have exactly one solution. Cut a hole and they have a one-parameter family. Nothing in the mathematics chooses between its members, which is why the Kutta condition has to exist and why it cannot be derived.

 The core that does not move, and where its edge is. Four velocity profiles at the same pressure gradient and four yield stresses. The shear stress in a pipe is G r/2 whatever the fluid is — that is a force balance and not a constitutive law — so the fluid is unyielded exactly inside r = 2 tau_y/G, and the plug radius is known before anything is solved. Viscosity

The core that does not move

Toothpaste in a tube has a region in the middle that is not being sheared at all, and its edge is at a radius you can write down before solving anything. Four things about that core are exact, and one of them is that the fluid does not flow below a threshold — not slowly, at all.

 A tube 10 cm across, spun: the lowest pressure is on the axis. The absolute pressure along a water-filled tube spun about its middle, open to the air at both ends, 5 cm from the axis. In the spinning frame the water is at rest under a centrifugal pull, so the pressure falls from atmospheric at each meniscus to its lowest on the axis, as a parabola. 10 thousand rpm puts −1.3 MPa there, 20 thousand rpm puts −5.4 MPa there, 30 thousand rpm puts −12.2 MPa there and 45 thousand rpm puts −27.6 MPa there. The place the water is stretched hardest is the place furthest from both free surfaces, which is the whole merit of the method: a gas cannot reach the liquid where it is weakest. What is taught wrongly

A breaking strength that is the size of a flaw

Water can be stretched, and how far is a measurement people have made for a century and a half with instruments that agree with one another and not with the theory. Spinning a tube puts the stretch where no gas can reach it, sealing one caps the stretch at water's density maximum, and every measured number turns out to name the size of the worst cavity in the sample.

All themes