Theme

The thread: The exact theory is wrong — page 16

Page 16 of 22, continuing through the 193 essays this motif runs through.

193 essays carry this thread — page 16 of 22.

Two ways to move a duty, along one axis, in opposite directions. A duty at a specific speed of 0.01 and what splitting it does. Dividing the head between stages in series multiplies each stage's specific speed by the number of stages to the three-quarter power, because the group carries (gH)^(−3/4); dividing the flow between units in parallel divides it by the square root of the number of units, because the group carries √Q. Both exponents are read off the group rather than remembered, and they are why the two operations are not interchangeable: three stages buy a factor of 2.28 and three units cost a factor of 0.58. The bands are drawn in the colour this site reserves for a borrowed claim, because where a Francis runner stops is practice rather than a result.

The duty that had no machine

Some duties have a specific speed outside every band, and no runner will do them at any size because the number contains no size. That is true and it is not the end. The same group says how to split the duty until it fits, and the two ways of splitting move it along the same axis in opposite directions, by exponents read straight off it.

The local sweep of the isobars, across the span. The sweep of the half-load line at each spanwise station, for four geometric sweeps. Over the middle of the span it is the wing's own sweep, which is the simple theory being right. At the root it collapses — by twenty-one degrees at a geometric thirty-five — and at the tip it falls again. That root region is where the shock forms first on every swept wing ever built, and it is why they have waisted fuselages.

Circulation and lift

The sweep a root does not have

Simple sweep theory is one of the cleanest arguments in aerodynamics: an infinite yawed wing cannot know about the velocity along its own span, so only the normal component matters. A real wing has a root and two tips, and at the root of a thirty-five-degree wing the isobars are swept fourteen.

The free surface a submerged body leaves behind it, and the flat water in front. The linearised free-surface problem solved as a Fourier integral with a radiation condition. Behind the body a wave train of the wavelength that stands still relative to it, 2 pi U²/g; ahead of it, an amplitude a hundred and twenty times smaller. The asymmetry is the drag: an ideal fluid with a free surface can carry energy away.

Ideal flow

The drag that is made of waves

D'Alembert's paradox says a body in a steady, irrotational, incompressible, inviscid flow feels no drag. Put a free surface above it and every one of those words still holds — and the drag is not zero. It is the energy walking away in the wave train behind.

And they are one piece of arithmetic. All three corrections against one over the logarithm of their own large parameter. Each is a straight line through the origin, with its own slope: one third exactly for the enstrophy range, near one for the wall layer, and near ln 10 for Oseen's per-decade measure. Three disappointments in three different fields, written up separately, are the same function.

Regimes and numbers

The three that never converge

Oseen's drag coefficient, the overlap layer's power-law exponent and the enstrophy range's slope are three separate disappointments in three different fields. They are one piece of arithmetic, and the arithmetic says why none of them will ever be reached.

The Fanno line, which has only one direction on it. The entropy relative to the sonic state, against Mach number, for both branches. Friction raises the entropy, so a duct flow moves to the right along this curve whichever branch it is on — up in Mach number from below and down from above — and it stops at the sonic point.

Compressible flow

A duct that cannot be run backwards

Friction drives a compressible duct flow towards the speed of sound from either side, and the entropy rises the whole way. So the state of the gas at a station is an odometer: it records how much duct is behind it, and no amount of further duct can take it back.

The patches' centroids, against the point-vortex circle. Two circular patches of uniform vorticity, advected by nothing but the velocity their own boundaries induce, over one full co-rotation. Their centroids stay within one per cent of a separation of the exact point-vortex orbit — which they must, because the exterior field of a circular patch is the point vortex's and a harmonic function's area average over a disc is its value at the centre.

Ideal flow

What a point vortex is not

Two circular patches of vorticity move exactly as two point vortices do — the centroid velocity is the point model's with no correction of any order, and that is a theorem rather than an approximation. The trouble starts the moment they stop being circular, which is immediately.

The structure the sensitivity produces. A detonation front, schematically: a leading shock, an induction zone in which nothing measurable happens, and a reaction zone behind it. The induction zone's length is set by the shock's own strength, and because that dependence is exponential the front is unstable and breaks into cells.

Compressible flow

A gas that has not decided to react yet

Behind a detonation's leading shock there is a zone in which nothing measurable happens. Its length is set by the temperature the shock produced, exponentially — a one per cent change in the shock shortens it by fifteen per cent — and that sensitivity is why a detonation front cannot stay flat.

Four kinds of critical point, and the curve that separates them. The invariants of a trace-free velocity gradient, with the discriminant curve 27R²/4 + Q³ = 0 drawn through them. Inside the two upper lobes the cubic has one real root and a complex pair, which is a spiral being stretched along its own axis on the left and squeezed on the right; below the curve all three roots are real and the point is a node with two saddle directions. Of 820 random incompressible gradients, 509 land in the spiral region and 311 in the real one. A plane flow is the vertical line R = 0 and nothing else, which is why a plane has two kinds and space has four. The marked points are the cases the calculation checks that fall inside this window; the two vortex cases it also checks sit at Q = 3.25 and |R| = 4.25, off the top corners, because a window wide enough to hold them would flatten the curve the figure is about.

Flows and fields

Two kinds is a plane flow's privilege

A plane incompressible flow has a saddle or a centre and nothing else, and the proof is one line about a trace. The same line in three dimensions constrains three numbers instead of two, which is far less, and what it leaves is four kinds of point separated by a curve — with the one a plane cannot have being the structure the whole of turbulence is made from.

Where a rotor's pressure rise comes from, as the radius moves. The static pressure rise across a rotor, split into the two terms rothalpy gives it. The diffusion term is held at the de Haller limit throughout — the blade is being asked to slow the relative flow as hard as a boundary layer will allow — so it is a flat 11558.4 Pa at every radius ratio. Everything above that line is the centrifugal term, which costs no diffusion and has no limit of its own. At a radius ratio of 2 it supplies 49.92 per cent of the rise and at 3, 72.66 per cent. An axial machine, at a ratio of exactly one, gets none of it.

Fluids at work

What a turning frame keeps

Euler's equation prices the work and says nothing about where the pressure comes from. In the frame turning with the blades — which is accelerating, and carries two fictitious forces — a Bernoulli-like quantity survives both of them, and it splits the pressure rise into a term a boundary layer limits and a term that is free if the radius moves.

All themes