Theme

The thread: The exact theory is wrong — page 21

Page 21 of 22, continuing through the 193 essays this motif runs through.

193 essays carry this thread — page 21 of 22.

The coefficient that was a constant, against the number it is said not to depend on. The dissipation coefficient Cε = eps·l/u³ along two decays, plotted against the Taylor-scale Reynolds number they pass through. One is flat because it was put in flat; the other falls as the reciprocal of the Reynolds number, which is what is measured in the near field of a grid. Neither line is a derivation. What is exact is the relation between them, Cε = 15(ℓ/λ)/Reλ, which is a rearrangement of two definitions and holds along both curves to 5·10⁻¹⁶.

The constant that travels

Every decay law in the subject rests on the dissipation being some constant times u³ over a length. The constant is not one. Letting it move the way grid measurements say it moves changes the decay exponent by a quarter — and lands one of the answers five per cent from another that is entirely different physics.

Six ways of reaching one speed. Six velocity histories, all starting from rest and all reaching exactly one at the same moment. Two are ramps, two are eased, one overshoots and comes back, and one goes backwards before it goes forwards.

Ideal flow

Everything about the start, except one vector

Six ways of accelerating a body from rest to the same speed produce six force histories with nothing in common — peaks spanning a factor of thirty-nine, two of them negative for part of the journey. The impulse left in the fluid is the same ten-figure number in every case, and so is the energy.

Viscosity

One channel, one flux, two flows

Flow between two plane walls meeting at a line has an exact solution. Past a threshold that turns out to be a ratio of gamma functions, it has two — the same wedge carrying the same flux, once outward everywhere and once with the fluid running backwards along both walls, and nothing in the equations chooses.

$A wave that travels and a wave that spreads. A harmonic pressure wave's amplitude and its instantaneous value along a tube, over two wavelengths of the inviscid wave, at four Womersley numbers. At α = 15 the wave marches on, a little weaker each wavelength. At α = 5 it is visibly damped. At α = 2 it is nearly gone within a wavelength. At α = 0.5 there is no wave to speak of: the disturbance falls away within a small fraction of the inviscid wavelength, as heat does into a wall.$ Regimes and numbers

The pulse that has to travel

In a rigid tube the Womersley number decides the shape of an oscillating flow. Make the wall elastic and the pressure pulse has to travel, a second number appears — the tube's length in wavelengths — and the first number turns out to decide something more basic than the profile: whether the tube carries a wave at all, or only a disturbance that spreads like heat.

Six flows past one cylinder, all of them legal. The tangential speed on the surface for six values of the circulation. Every one of them solves the same equation and lets nothing through the wall; the fastest point on the surface runs from twice the free stream to eight times it.

Ideal flow

Nothing in the present picks the flow

Six flows past one cylinder satisfy the same equation and let nothing through the wall, to the last bit of double precision. Their lifts run from zero to 37.7 and their peak suctions differ by a factor of twenty-one. The equations do not choose between them, and the thing that does is the history.

One curve from two to one, with four thirds somewhere in the middle. The ratio of the transverse second-order structure function to the longitudinal one, against separation, at three Reynolds numbers. Every value on every curve follows from the longitudinal function alone by a relation with no dynamics in it. It is exactly 2 where the field is smooth, exactly 1 beyond the correlation length, and it passes through four thirds on the way — but it passes through rather than resting there, and how nearly it rests is the whole of what a Reynolds number buys.

Transition and turbulence

A relation with no turbulence in it

Isotropy and incompressibility alone fix the transverse structure function from the longitudinal one. Divide the relation through and it says the ratio of the two is one plus half the local slope — so the exponent everybody measures as 0.70 and the ratio everybody measures as 1.35 are one measurement, and a model spectrum with no intermittency in it produces both.

Six that are symmetries and five that look like them. Each transformation applied to an exact solution, with the Navier-Stokes residual recomputed from the transformed field by finite differences — nothing differentiated by hand. The six symmetries leave the residual at the differencing floor, a few parts in 10^8. The five near-misses leave between 0.048 and 4.3, which is six to nine orders of magnitude larger. The gap is what makes this a test rather than an illustration: a transformation that is nearly a symmetry does not exist here, and every one of the five is something a reader might reasonably believe.

Viscosity

Why the list is this long

Every textbook list of exact solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations is about a dozen long, and the usual explanation is that the equations are hard. It is not the reason. A similarity reduction is a solution invariant under a subgroup of the equations' own symmetries, so the catalogue of possible reductions is the catalogue of subgroups — and that is a finite, countable object.

The characteristic gets a wall, and the wall does not care about the discharge. One jet pump's characteristic, at an area ratio of 0.275, with the flow ratio at which its throat entry reaches vapour pressure drawn for three values of the cavitation parameter σ = (Pₛ − pᵥ)/(Pₘ − Pₛ). Left of a wall the machine runs on its curve. At the wall no lower discharge pressure raises the flow: the head ratio can fall to zero along the vertical and the flow ratio stays where it is. The wall's position contains the nozzle and suction losses and nothing downstream of the throat entry.

Fluids at work

The wall the suction puts in the curve

A liquid jet pump's lowest pressure is where the entrained stream enters the throat, and when that reaches vapour pressure the pump curve stops being a curve. The flow ratio freezes at a value no lower discharge pressure can move — and raising the motive pressure, the obvious cure, brings the wall closer.

What is taught wrongly

The spot a local theory cannot see

Newtonian theory gives every panel of a hypersonic vehicle a pressure set by its own angle to the stream, and no panel more than the stagnation pressure behind a normal shock. Let a shock from one part cross the bow shock of another and a supersonic jet forms that reaches the surface through weaker shocks. At Mach 8 it stagnates at 8.6 times the ceiling — and the worst amplification at every Mach number is close to the Mach number itself.

All themes